المؤلفون: John Melville-Jones

المصدر: Byzantina Symmeikta, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 247-262 (2015)
Βυζαντινά Σύμμεικτα; ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΑ ΣΥΜΜΕΙΚΤΑ 24; 247-262
Byzantina Symmeikta; ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΑ SΥΜΜΕΙΚΤΑ 24; 247-262

مصطلحات موضوعية: Literature, History, patriarch, Poetry, business.industry, Statement (logic), lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe, media_common.quotation_subject, lcsh:D111-203, Foundation (evidence), lcsh:Medieval history, Context (language use), lcsh:History of Greece, lcsh:DF10-951, Style (visual arts), lcsh:D, Rhetoric, Classics, business, Order (virtue), media_common, Constantinople (name)

الوصف: In modern works it is often stated that Constantinople was called ‘New Rome’ (or ‘Second Rome’), with the implication that this was an official title. This incorrect statement is particularly common in works written by scholars whose first, and perhaps only, language is English (which is why a thorough English-language study of the question, with the relevant evidence translated into English and analysed rather than simply accepted, is needed). Some ancient authors (writing long after the foundation of the city) do in fact say or imply that Constantinople was formally named ‘New Rome’ or ‘Second Rome’, but this claim is, as Franz Dölger wrote a long time ago, ‘auf einer Fiktion beruht’. These expressions belong to laudatory rhetoric and elevated historical prose and poetry, and are never found in official documents or on the coinage. Also, who could believe that Constantine I would ever have allowed any name other than his to be the official name of his new city? The present study examines the relevant evidence in order to demonstrate that it is wrong to say that Constantine’s city was ever officially called anything other than ‘Constantinople’. On the other hand, it also shows that in an ecclesiastical context it has been correct to refer to ‘New Rome’, ever since the decision of the Oecumenical Council of A.D. 381, arranged by Theodosius I. The question has often been discussed in the past, but this study of the evidence reaches a firmer conclusion than most previous discussions, explains why an incorrect opinion has flourished, analyses the evidence more closely and presents it in English.

وصف الملف: application/pdf

URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c105cdd7158ade23be300940e26d3163
http://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/bz/article/view/3848

المؤلفون: Michał Drożdż

المصدر: The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 109-138 (2013)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Ethical responsibility, Structure (mathematical logic), Natural philosophy, Computer science, Field (Bourdieu), Organic Chemistry, natural philosophy, Foundation (evidence), Context (language use), nature, lcsh:Practical religion. The Christian life, Biochemistry, Epistemology, Time, lcsh:BV4485-5099, ethics of responsibility, the structure of time, the future, Dimension (data warehouse), Relation (history of concept)

الوصف: The basic concept in the philosophy of Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker is the concept of time. Playing the dominant role in the thought and philosophy of Weizsäcker, the concept is the point of departure for an attempt to find ways to cognize and recreate the unity of Nature, to understand “the unity of physics” and its reconstruction in the neo-Kantian spirit, as well as seek and analyse conditions of the possibilities of science and its ethical dimension. In this context Weizsäcker analyses relations between the structure of time and the ethical responsibility of a man practising science. The present study aims to demonstrate the basic elements of this relation as the foundation of the ethics of scientific research. Responsible scientific research is only possible when men operating within the field are guided by objective principles of the ethics of responsibility.

URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ba260b48876f974a0caf4b8752043667
http://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/thepersonandthechallenges/article/view/478/406

المؤلفون: Janusz Królikowski

المصدر: The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 179-201 (2011)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Interpretation (philosophy), Philosophy, media_common.quotation_subject, Organic Chemistry, Foundation (evidence), Doctrine, Context (language use), lcsh:Practical religion. The Christian life, Biochemistry, Chalcedon Council, lcsh:BV4485-5099, Meaning (philosophy of language), soteriology, Soteriology, Relevance (law), Theology, chrystology, Order (virtue), media_common

الوصف: The Christological doctrine de fi ned during the Chalcedon Council (451) was the point of reference to consolidate the Christian doctrine in the fi fth century. It also became the foundation of the evangelizing mission led by the Church in the following centuries. In the context of the new challenges and interpretation a question, whether the Chalcedon doctrine needs to be reinterpreted, arises. This article tries to show the relevance of the Christological dogma which was de fi ned by the Chalcedon Council. The attention is paid to this dogma rooted in the Church Tradition and also to its soteriological and anthropological meaning. The soteriological perspective, which was given the utmost importance during the Chalcedon Council and similarly during other councils held in the fi rst millennium, proves the doctrinal relevance of the dogma and furthermore makes it more meaningful. From the hermeneutic point of view this article presents the need of referring to the principle of theological apophatism in order to interpret the dogma correctly.

URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9d80741a4c187b339f9dfa374bb2a753
http://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/thepersonandthechallenges/article/view/838/716