Alternate Title: grammatical protest in the explanations of al-Muradi and al-Ashmuni on Ibn Malik's alfiat.) Study of syntax - morphology - balance(. (English)

المؤلفون: نعيمة إبرهيم سليمان تقابو

المصدر: Arab Journal for Humanities & Social Sciences; Apr2023, Issue 18, p1-23, 23p

مصطلحات موضوعية: STANDING position, HADITH, RATING of students, JOURNALISTS, POETRY (Literary form)

Abstract (English): Alfiyat Ibn Malik is the most famous grammatical system, that the scholars and learners came to it, to preserve, study, and explain over centuries, Its broad wide spread led to the large number of its explanations in a clear quantity, that the grammatical system explanations authoring over seen as such as, in a view of the importance of Alfiyat Ibn Malik, its explanation in one hand, and the importance of the Holy Quran and its readings in the grammatical protest on the other hand. This research was conducted to study the cited sources in the two explanations, the positions of the two Explanations of the Holy Quran protest, and its diversity readings, the noble prophetic Hadith, and poetry. The descriptive analytical method was used, so clarified their methods, and provide sufficient evidences in a way that demonstrate that, the Quranic evidences was ranked in the first class among the protest sources. It was clarified through it that the commentators had protested remarkably by poetry, including the unknown poetry, and they stand in an intermediate position between the permissibility and prohibition from cite with the noble prophetic Hadith. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract (Arabic): ألفية ابن مالك هي المنظومة النحوية الأكثر شهرة والتي أقبل عليها العلماء والمتعلمون حفظ ا ودئا وشرخا على مدى قرون عدة، وقد أدى ذيوعها الواسع إلى كثرة شروحها كثرة واضحة لم يعرف التأليف في شرح النظم النحوي مثيال لها. نظرا إلى أهمية الألفية وشروحها من ناحية وإلى أهمية القرآن الكريم وقراءاته في الاحتجاج النحوي من ناحية أخرى، فقد قام هذا البحث لدراسة مصادر الاستشهاد النحوي في الشرحين، وموقف الشارحين من الاحتجاج بالقرآن الكريم وقراءاته المتعددة،والحديث النبوي الشريف والشعر،وقد اتتبع فيه المنهج الوصفي التحليلي ،فأوضح مناهجهم في ذلك، وقدم الشواهد الكافية على نحو أبان أن الشواهد القرآنية كانت في المرتبة الأولى بين مصادر الاحتجاج، كما تبين من خلاله أن الشارحين كليهما قد أكثرا من الاحتجاج بالشعر بشكل لافت بما في ذلك الشعر مجهول القائل، وأنهما وقفا موقفا وسطا بين الجواز والمنع من الاستشهاد بالحديث النبوي الشريف. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of Arab Journal for Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of AL-Sunbula Center for Research and Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Alternate Title: The Soloist's Prayer behind the Row: a study from the Hadiths of the Prophet and jurisprudence perspective. (English)

المؤلفون: الهادي أبكر أحمد هارون, يعقوب عبد الرحمن يعقوب موسى

المصدر: Arab Journal for Humanities & Social Sciences; Apr2023, Issue 18, p1-23, 23p

مصطلحات موضوعية: PRAYERS, HADITH, COMPARATIVE method, RESEARCH personnel, PRAYER, FELONIES

People: MUHAMMAD, Prophet, d. 632

Abstract (English): This study comes under the title: (The Soloist's Prayer behind the Row: a study from the Hadiths of the Prophet and jurisprudence perspective). It aims to identify the legal rulings related to the solo prayer behind the row and the issues arising from it. The researcher followed the inductive, the comparative and the deductive method by following the hadiths under study and what the jurists wrote about it, then comparing their opinions and sayings; to derive the appropriate legal ruling which closest to the Prophet's guidance. The study reached several results, the most important of which are: that if the worshiper finds a place in the row, and he prays alone; his prayers are not valid, and if he strives and does not find it, it is permissible for him to line up himself a lone and his prayers are valid. This is based on the principle (no duty with excuse, nor forbidden with necessity); because it is obligatory to pray with the congregation and in the row; if standing in the row is not possible, the other remains obligatory, which is the congregational prayer. Also, one of the results is that whoever does not find any gaps; he can pray behind the row alone; he should not pull anyone from the front row, and his prayer is valid for this is the correct act. This is due to the weakness of the hadiths mentioned in the pulling. In addition, pulling entails many warnings and evils, including: disturbing the pulled one and those next to him, and being preoccupied with them. It also includes a felony against the pulled one; moving him from the virtuous place to the preferred place. In conclusion, the study also reached to other results which are transmitted in the folds of the research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract (Arabic): جاءت هذه الدراسة بعنوذ:(صلاة المتغرد خلف الصف درسة حديئية فقهية)، وهدفت إلى الرف على الأحكام الشرعية المتعلقة بصلاة المتغرد خلف الصف والمسائل المتفرعة عنها، استخدم الباحثان المنهج الاستقرئي ولمنهج المقارن ولمنهج االستذباطي؛ وذللك بتتبع الأحاديث موضوع الدرسة وما كتدبه الفقهاء حوله، ثم المقارنة بين آرئهم وقولهم؛ لاستنباط الحكم الشرعي المناسب وألقرب للهدي النبوي الشريف. وقد توصلت الدرسة إلى نتائج عديدة أهمها: أن المصلي إن وجد محلا في الصف فصلى وحده؛ لم تصح صلاته، ون اجتهد ولم يجد جاز أن يصف وحده وتصح صلاته؛ وذلك بناء على قاعدة (ال وجب مع العذر وال حرام مع الضرور)؛ لآن الواجب الصلاة مع الجماعة وفي الصف؛ فان تعذر المقام في الصف بقي الآخر وجبأ وهو صلاة الجماعة.ومن النتائج أن من لم يجد أية فرجة يصلي خلف الصف وحده، ولا يجذب أحد الأحاديث الورة في الجذب؛ كما أن الجذب تترتب عليه محاذير ومغاسد كثير منها: التشوش على الرجل المجذوب وعلى من بجانبيه ونشغال بالهم؛ كما فيه جناية على المجذوب؛ بنقله من المكان الغاضل إلى المكان المغضول. وغير ذلك من النتائج وهي مبثوثة في ثنايا البحث. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of Arab Journal for Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of AL-Sunbula Center for Research and Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)