المؤلفون: Jean-Jacques Baldauf, Pierre Meyer, Michel Dreyfus, Emile Philippe, Jean Ritter

المصدر: Acta Cytologica. 41:295-301

مصطلحات موضوعية: Gynecology, medicine.medical_specialty, Pregnancy, Histology, Cervical screening, business.industry, General Medicine, Cervical cancer screening, medicine.disease, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, medicine.anatomical_structure, Cytopathology, Cytology, medicine, False positive paradox, Cervicography, business, Cervix

الوصف: OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of cytology with that of cervicography and with the use of both tests when screening for neoplasia of the cervix and to analyze the causes of false positive and false negative results with both methods. STUDY DESIGN: The results of cytology and cervicography in 1,709 patients (1,447 seen for routine screening, 82 for follow-up after treatment for cervical neoplasia and 180 referred because of cytologic anomalies) were correlated with colpohistologic findings. RESULTS: Cervicography entailed more defective examinations than did cytology (8.9% vs. 0.2%, P

URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c91afc56555c961f45350aead97c816d
https://doi.org/10.1159/000332515