-
1دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Calloway, Eric E, Seligman, Hilary K, Boyd, Lisa W, Stern, Katie L, Rosenmoss, Sophie, Yaroch, Amy L
المصدر: Public Health Nutrition. 22(12)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Public Health, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Nutrition and Dietetics, Health Sciences, Nutrition, Clinical Research, Behavioral and Social Science, Cardiovascular, Oral and gastrointestinal, Adult, California, Diet, Feasibility Studies, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Assistance, Food Supply, Georgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York, Poverty, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Food pantries, Emergency food assistance, Low-income population, Survey development, Dietary correlates, Dietary screener, Medical and Health Sciences, Nutrition & Dietetics, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
الوصف: ObjectiveTo use cognitive interviewing and pilot testing to develop a survey instrument feasible for administering in the food pantry setting to assess daily intake frequency from several major food groups and dietary correlates (e.g. fruit and vegetable barriers) - the FRESH Foods Survey.DesignNew and existing survey items were adapted and refined following cognitive interviews. After piloting the survey with food pantry users in the USA, preliminary psychometric and construct validity analyses were performed.SettingThree US food banks and accompanying food pantries in Atlanta, GA, San Diego, CA, and Buffalo, NY.ParticipantsFood pantry clients (n 246), mostly female (68 %), mean age 54·5 (sd 14·7) years.ResultsMeasures of dietary correlates performed well psychometrically: Cronbach's α range 0·71-0·90, slope (α) parameter range 1·26-6·36, and threshold parameters (β) indicated variability in the 'difficulty' of the items. Additionally, all scales had only one eigenvalue above 1·0 (range 2·07-4·71), indicating unidimensionality. Average (median, Q1-Q3) daily intakes (times/d) across six dietary groups were: fruits and vegetables (2·87, 1·87-4·58); junk foods (1·16, 0·58-2·16); fast foods and similar entrées (1·45, 0·58-2·03); whole-grain foods (0·87, 0·58-1·71); sugar-sweetened beverages (0·58, 0·29-1·29); milk and milk alternatives (0·71, 0·29-1·29). Significant correlations between dietary groups and dietary correlates were largely in the directions expected based on the literature, giving initial indication of convergent and discriminant validity.ConclusionsThe FRESH Foods Survey is efficient, tailored to food pantry populations, can be used to monitor dietary behaviours and may be useful to measure intervention impact.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
URL الوصول: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jf1s2mf
-
2
المؤلفون: Yvonne M. Baptiste, Cherylea J. Browne, Samuel Abramovich
المصدر: Advances in Physiology Education
مصطلحات موضوعية: Knowledge management, survey development, Physiology, Computer science, media_common.quotation_subject, Learning analytics, support of research, Science education, Education, Resource (project management), Perception, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, Humans, Learning, Relevance (information retrieval), Digital learning, Pandemics, media_common, learning analytics, SARS-CoV-2, business.industry, COVID-19, Reproducibility of Results, Construct validity, General Medicine, Exploratory factor analysis, science education, Education Research, business
الوصف: Supplemental resources in science education are made available to students based on the belief that they will improve course-based student learning. This belief is ubiquitous, with supplemental resources being a traditional component of physiology education. In addition, the recent large-scale transition to remote learning caused by the Covid-19 pandemic suggests an increased relevance and necessity of digital versions of supplemental resources. However, the use of a supplemental resource is entirely dependent on whether students view it as beneficial. If students in a specific course do not perceive a supplemental resource as useful, there is little reason to believe the resources will be used and are worthy of investment. Consequently, measurement of student perception regarding the effectiveness of any digital learning tool is essential for educators and institutions in order to prioritize resources and make meaningful recommendations to students. In this study, a survey was used to determine student perceptions of a digital, supplemental resource. Quantitative methods, including exploratory factor analysis, were performed on data collected from the survey to examine the dimensionality and functionality of this survey. The findings from this study were used to devise an improved, standardized (i.e., reliable and valid) survey that can be used and adapted by physi3ology researchers and educators to determine student perception of a digital supplemental resource. The survey, with known construct validity and internal reliability, can provide useful information for administrators, instructors, and designers of digital supplemental resources.
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::909db0f5d16fd97a37c5f7a3a821f39d
https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00080.2021 -
3
المؤلفون: George Leckie, Elena Hoicka, Burcu Soy-Telli, William J Browne, Erika Nurmsoo, Eloise Prouten, Merideth Gattis
المساهمون: Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi/fen-edebiyat fakültesi/psikoloji bölümü/gelişim psikolojisi anabilim dalı
المصدر: Hoicka, E, Soy-Telli, B, Prouten, E, Leckie, G, Browne, W J, Nurmsoo, E & Gattis, M 2021, ' The Early Social Cognition Inventory (ESCI) : An Examination of its Psychometric Properties from Birth to 47 Months ', Behavior Research Methods, vol. 54, pp. 1200–1226 . https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01628-z
مصطلحات موضوعية: Canada, Joint attention, Psychometrics, media_common.quotation_subject, education, Ethnic group, Theory of Mind, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognition, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Social cognition, Theory of mind, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Humans, Child, General Psychology, media_common, Survey development, Toddlers, Preschoolers, Australia, Infant, Reproducibility of Results, United States, Test (assessment), Child, Preschool, Household income, Psychology (miscellaneous), Psychology, Imitation, Infants, Clinical psychology
الوصف: Elena Hoicka, Burcu Soy Telli, and Eloise Prouten designed the research, and collected and coded the data. Elena Hoicka was the primary author, and analysed the data. Burcu Soy Telli wrote parts of the Method section, and Merideth Gattis wrote parts of the Introduction. Burcu Soy Telli, Merideth Gattis, George Leckie, William J. Browne, and Erika Nurmsoo edited and gave feedback on the manuscript, both in terms of content and analyses. Social cognition refers to a broad range of cognitive processes and skills that allow individuals to interact with and understand others, including a variety of skills from infancy through preschool and beyond, e.g., joint attention, imitation, and belief understanding. However, no measures examine socio-cognitive development from birth through preschool. Current test batteries and parent-report measures focus either on infancy, or toddlerhood through preschool (and beyond). We report six studies in which we developed and tested a new 21-item parent-report measure of social cognition targeting 0–47 months: the Early Social Cognition Inventory (ESCI). Study 1 (N = 295) revealed the ESCI has excellent internal reliability, and a two-factor structure capturing social cognition and age. Study 2 (N = 605) also showed excellent internal reliability and confirmed the two-factor structure. Study 3 (N = 84) found a medium correlation between the ESCI and a researcher-administered social cognition task battery. Study 4 (N = 46) found strong 1-month test–retest reliability. Study 5 found longitudinal stability (6 months: N = 140; 12 months: N = 39), and inter-observer reliability between parents (N = 36) was good, and children’s scores increased significantly over 6 and 12 months. Study 6 showed the ESCI was internally reliable within countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Trinidad and Tobago); parent ethnicity; parent education; and age groups from 4–39 months. ESCI scores positively correlated with household income (UK); children with siblings had higher scores; and Australian parents reported lower scores than American, British, and Canadian parents. University of Sheffield Women Academic Returners Program, University of Bristol Returning Carers Scheme Grant, Ministry of Education in Turkey.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e741d05158feb5d873d7a782a78139c2
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/309541613/Hoicka2021_Article_TheEarlySocialCognitionInvento.pdf -
4
المؤلفون: Julia M. Appel, Ariella R. Korn, Christina D. Economos, Aviva Must, Louise C. Mâsse, Ross A. Hammond, Erin Hennessy
المصدر: Implementation Science, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
Implementation Science : ISمصطلحات موضوعية: Pediatric Obesity, Medicine (General), Psychometrics, Applied psychology, Psychological intervention, Health Informatics, Trust, Confirmatory factor analysis, Whole-of-community interventions, Consistency (negotiation), R5-920, Surveys and Questionnaires, Childhood obesity prevention, Content validity, Medicine, Humans, Psychometric evaluation, Child, Survey development, Item analysis, business.industry, Health Policy, Community settings, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Methodology, Construct validity, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, Scale (social sciences), Survey data collection, business, Factor Analysis, Statistical
الوصف: Background Whole-of-community interventions hold promise in addressing childhood obesity. The COMPACT Stakeholder-driven Community Diffusion theory posits that stakeholders’ knowledge of childhood obesity prevention efforts and engagement with the issue contribute to successful intervention implementation. Building on completed formative research and pilot testing, we describe the validation and refinement of knowledge and engagement measures. Methods We assessed content validity using a modified Delphi process with science (n=18) and practice-based (n=16) experts. Next, we refined the survey based on input from science- and practice-based experts, cognitive response testing, and item analysis of extant survey data. Field testing of the refined survey involved community stakeholders in Greenville County, South Carolina (n=50), East Boston, Massachusetts (n=30), and Tucson, Arizona (n=84) between 2019 and 2020. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Two-week test-retest reliability was assessed among a subsample of 14 paired respondents in South Carolina. Results Experts rated existing knowledge domains (intervention factors, roles, sustainability, problem, resources) and engagement domains (dialogue/mutual learning, flexibility, influence/power, leadership/stewardship, trust) highly for their importance in addressing childhood obesity. Expert input resulted in 11 new knowledge items and 7 new engagement items that mapped onto existing domains. Correspondingly, two domain names were modified: implementation/sustainability and trust/trustworthiness. We also eliminated 8 extant items (4 knowledge and 4 engagement) and adapted item language for comprehension and consistency. Further modifications based on CFA results and item analyses resulted in 23 knowledge items across four domains (roles and resources merged) and 23 engagement items across five domains. Modified knowledge and engagement scales had adequate fit and strong item factor loadings (most >0.7 and all >0.5). Knowledge (α=0.86–0.87) and engagement (α=0.75–0.90) subscales had high internal scale consistency. Knowledge intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest agreement of subscale scores ranged from 0.50 for intervention factors to 0.86 for roles/resources. For engagement subscale scores, ICCs ranged from 0.70 for trust/trustworthiness to 0.96 for leadership/stewardship. Conclusions Findings from this multi-method survey development process increase our confidence of the knowledge and engagement measures’ content validity, construct validity, and reliability.
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3571e932049b65cf5bba1b67bbef6e48
-
5
المؤلفون: Jennifer B Keogh, Kristy L Gray, Mayya Grebenshchikova, Lois McKellar, Sharleen O'Reilly, Peter M. Clifton
المساهمون: Gray, Kristy L, Grebenshchikova, Mayya, O'Reilly, Sharleen L, McKellar, Lois, Clifton, Peter M, Keogh, Jennifer B
المصدر: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume 18
Issue 2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 480, p 480 (2021)مصطلحات موضوعية: Content validation, medicine.medical_specialty, Diabetes risk, survey development, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, media_common.quotation_subject, lcsh:Medicine, diabetes prevention, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, Article, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Pregnancy, law, Weight loss, Surveys and Questionnaires, Perception, Weight Loss, Humans, Medicine, 030212 general & internal medicine, media_common, business.industry, lcsh:R, content validation, Australia, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproducibility of Results, Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, medicine.disease, Gestational diabetes, Diabetes, Gestational, Family medicine, CLARITY, Female, Pilot test, medicine.symptom, gestational diabetes, Theoretical Domains Framework, business
الوصف: Our objective was to describe the development and validation of a survey investigating barriers to weight loss, perception of diabetes risk, and views of diet strategies following gestational diabetes (GDM). The survey underwent three stages of development: generation of items, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. A content validation index (CVI) was calculated from expert responses regarding item relevance, coherence, clarity, and response options. Experts also responded to the domain fit of questions linked to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Pilot responders answered the survey and responded to review questions. Six experts in the field of nutrition, midwifery, psychology, or other health or medical research completed the expert review stage of the survey. In the pilot test, there were 20 responders who were women with previous GDM and who were living in Australia. The overall CVI from the expert review was 0.91. All questions except one received an I-CVI of >
0.78 for relevance (n = 35). Fourteen of the 27 items linked to the TDF received an agreement ratio of <
1.0. Twenty-seven of the 31 pilot questions were completed by &ge
90% of responders. Pilot review questions revealed an agreement percentage of &ge
86% (n = 12) regarding the survey&rsquo
s ease to complete, understand, importance, length, and interest level. The final survey tool consists of 30 items and achieved content validation through expert evaluation and pilot testing.وصف الملف: application/pdf; PDF
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db9a89d6670e006fb9c2f355a1c54fcd
https://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/146423 -
6
المؤلفون: Eric E. Calloway, Sophie Rosenmoss, Amy L. Yaroch, Lisa Weissenburger-Moser Boyd, Hilary K. Seligman, Katie L. Stern
المصدر: Public health nutrition, vol 22, iss 12
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Georgia, Psychometrics, Daily intake, New York, Medicine (miscellaneous), Cardiovascular, Medical and Health Sciences, Article, California, Oral and gastrointestinal, Food Supply, Food group, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Emergency food assistance, Cronbach's alpha, Clinical Research, Environmental health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Behavioral and Social Science, Humans, Food pantries, 030212 general & internal medicine, Cognitive interview, Poverty, Nutrition, Survey development, 030505 public health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Nutrition & Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Discriminant validity, Construct validity, Reproducibility of Results, Low-income population, Mean age, Feeding Behavior, Food bank, Middle Aged, Dietary correlates, Diet, Feasibility Studies, Dietary screener, Female, Food Assistance, 0305 other medical science, Psychology
الوصف: Objective:To use cognitive interviewing and pilot testing to develop a survey instrument feasible for administering in the food pantry setting to assess daily intake frequency from several major food groups and dietary correlates (e.g. fruit and vegetable barriers) – the FRESH Foods Survey.Design:New and existing survey items were adapted and refined following cognitive interviews. After piloting the survey with food pantry users in the USA, preliminary psychometric and construct validity analyses were performed.Setting:Three US food banks and accompanying food pantries in Atlanta, GA, San Diego, CA, and Buffalo, NY.Participants:Food pantry clients (n 246), mostly female (68 %), mean age 54·5 (sd 14·7) years.Results:Measures of dietary correlates performed well psychometrically: Cronbach’s α range 0·71–0·90, slope (α) parameter range 1·26–6·36, and threshold parameters (β) indicated variability in the ‘difficulty’ of the items. Additionally, all scales had only one eigenvalue above 1·0 (range 2·07–4·71), indicating unidimensionality. Average (median, Q1–Q3) daily intakes (times/d) across six dietary groups were: fruits and vegetables (2·87, 1·87–4·58); junk foods (1·16, 0·58–2·16); fast foods and similar entrées (1·45, 0·58–2·03); whole-grain foods (0·87, 0·58–1·71); sugar-sweetened beverages (0·58, 0·29–1·29); milk and milk alternatives (0·71, 0·29–1·29). Significant correlations between dietary groups and dietary correlates were largely in the directions expected based on the literature, giving initial indication of convergent and discriminant validity.Conclusions:The FRESH Foods Survey is efficient, tailored to food pantry populations, can be used to monitor dietary behaviours and may be useful to measure intervention impact.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
7
المؤلفون: Alison Tovar, Jaimie McGlashan, Matthew W. Gillman, Matt Kasman, Erin Hennessy, Christina D. Economos, Boyd Swinburn, Ross A. Hammond, Brynle Owen, Ariella R. Korn, Lynne Millar, Mark C. Pachucki, Steven Allender
المصدر: BMC Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018)
BMC Public Healthمصطلحات موضوعية: Pediatric Obesity, medicine.medical_specialty, Victoria, Applied psychology, Psychological intervention, Childhood obesity, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Stakeholder Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Childhood obesity prevention, Humans, Medicine, Prospective Studies, 030212 general & internal medicine, Child, Reliability (statistics), Retrospective Studies, Survey development, Community-based interventions, 030505 public health, Community engagement, Conceptualization, business.industry, lcsh:Public aspects of medicine, Public health, Community Participation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Stakeholder, Reproducibility of Results, lcsh:RA1-1270, medicine.disease, Biostatistics, 0305 other medical science, business, Research Article
الوصف: Background Involving groups of community stakeholders (e.g., steering committees) to lead community-wide health interventions appears to support multiple outcomes ranging from policy and systems change to individual biology. While numerous tools are available to measure stakeholder characteristics, many lack detail on reliability and validity, are not context specific, and may not be sensitive enough to capture change over time. This study describes the development and reliability of a novel survey to measure Stakeholder-driven Community Diffusion via assessment of stakeholders’ social networks, knowledge, and engagement about childhood obesity prevention. Methods This study was completed in three phases. Phase 1 included conceptualization and online survey development through literature reviews and expert input. Phase 2 included a retrospective study with stakeholders from two completed whole-of-community interventions. Between May–October 2015, 21 stakeholders from the Shape Up Somerville and Romp & Chomp interventions recalled their social networks, knowledge, and engagement pre-post intervention. We also assessed one-week test-retest reliability of knowledge and engagement survey modules among Shape Up Somerville respondents. Phase 3 included survey modifications and a second prospective reliability assessment. Test-retest reliability was assessed in May 2016 among 13 stakeholders involved in ongoing interventions in Victoria, Australia. Results In Phase 1, we developed a survey with 7, 20 and 50 items for the social networks, knowledge, and engagement survey modules, respectively. In the Phase 2 retrospective study, Shape Up Somerville and Romp & Chomp networks included 99 and 54 individuals. Pre-post Shape Up Somerville and Romp & Chomp mean knowledge scores increased by 3.5 points (95% CI: 0.35–6.72) and (− 0.42–7.42). Engagement scores did not change significantly (Shape Up Somerville: 1.1 points (− 0.55–2.73); Romp & Chomp: 0.7 points (− 0.43–1.73)). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for knowledge and engagement were 0.88 (0.67–0.97) and 0.97 (0.89–0.99). In Phase 3, the modified knowledge and engagement survey modules included 18 and 25 items, respectively. Knowledge and engagement ICCs were 0.84 (0.62–0.95) and 0.58 (0.23–0.86). Conclusions The survey measures upstream stakeholder properties—social networks, knowledge, and engagement—with good test-retest reliability. Future research related to Stakeholder-driven Community Diffusion should focus on prospective change and survey validation for intervention effectiveness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5588-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
-
8
المؤلفون: Hazem Qannam, Ahmed Aboabat
المصدر: BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)مصطلحات موضوعية: Predictive validity, Rehabilitation hospital, Adult, Male, 030506 rehabilitation, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, medicine.medical_treatment, Saudi Arabia, Validity, Rehabilitation Centers, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Patient satisfaction, Cronbach's alpha, Surveys and Questionnaires, Content validity, Medicine, Humans, Child, Aged, Survey development, Inpatients, Principal Component Analysis, Rehabilitation, business.industry, lcsh:Public aspects of medicine, Health Policy, Construct validity, Reproducibility of Results, lcsh:RA1-1270, Middle Aged, Psychometric properties, Physical therapy, Female, 0305 other medical science, business, Factor Analysis, Statistical, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Research Article
الوصف: Background In the management of chronic disease, evidence suggests that satisfied patients exhibit more loyalty to treatment providers and greater adherence to treatment regimens. This is particularly so in the rehabilitation setting. We aimed to develop a reliable and valid Arabic-language survey to objectively measure inpatient satisfaction in medical rehabilitation settings in Saudi Arabia. Methods The King Fahad Medical City Rehabilitation Hospital Patient Satisfaction Survey (RH PSS) is a self-administered survey that addresses four domains of rehabilitation care: access, structure, process, and outcomes. The RH PSS was developed through four steps. Step 1: An item-generation process utilizing input from patients, rehabilitation professionals, and the relevant literature. Step 2: Individual interviews and focus groups, conducted for cognitive testing of the survey and to examine content validity. Step 3: Assessment of internal consistency and construct validity. Step 4: Survey implementation wherein factor analysis and reliability and validity testing were conducted. The survey was conducted at an acute inpatient medical rehabilitation hospital in Saudi Arabia. A total of 709 rehabilitation inpatients participated. Results The RH PSS demonstrated reasonable reliability and validity. Cronbach’s alpha for all the RH PSS subscales ranged from 0.81 to 0.89, and 0.96 for the entire survey. Factor analysis showed good correlation of the 33 survey items and the subscales. The RH PSS demonstrated a good level of predictive validity through the high correlation between the global item “intent to recommend” and overall satisfaction (R2 = 0.786, adjusted R2 = 0.783, p = 0.01). Conclusions The RH PSS is the first satisfaction survey with reported validity and reliability testing to address inpatient rehabilitation settings in Saudi Arabia. Further research involving multiple sites is recommended for nationwide validation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2596-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
إعادة تعيين المنقحات
عرض المنقحات (%%عد%%)