المؤلفون: Alexandru Ovidiu Gacea

المساهمون: Philosophie, pratiques et langages (PPL ), Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), L. Pitteloud, E. Keeling

المصدر: Psychology and Ontology in Plato
L. Pitteloud; E. Keeling. Psychology and Ontology in Plato, 139, Springer International Publishing, In press, Philosophical Studies Series, 978-3-030-04653-8. ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_4⟩
Philosophical Studies Series ISBN: 9783030046538

مصطلحات موضوعية: media_common.quotation_subject, Philosophy, Self, 05 social sciences, Dialogical self, [SHS.PHIL]Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, Universal language, 06 humanities and the arts, 0603 philosophy, ethics and religion, 050105 experimental psychology, language.human_language, Epistemology, Dialogic mind - Cognitive sciences - Plato - Internal dialogue - Polyphony - Voice - Microcommunity - Inwardness - Selfhood - Immaterial thought - Inner private space, Meaning (philosophy of language), Reading (process), 060302 philosophy, Sophist, language, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Polyphony, Soul, media_common

الوصف: International audience; The Theaetetus and the Sophist depict one of Plato's most well-known ideas about thought, namely, the dialogue of the soul with itself. Unfortunately, what Plato means by this has been obscured by three habits in the scholarship: (1) to consider the notion as being self-evident, (2) to treat it as being about the immaterial and universal language of thought, and (3) to understand it through the distorting lens of the Christian-modern idea of inwardness and inner private space. I argue for a more tentative reading of "inner dialogue," where its localization is understood in terms of "physical distinction" and its meaning is construed around Plato's ideas of polyphony and "microcommunity." We thereby learn that thinking is a psychophysical process associated with breathing and that it consists of a "coming-together" of multiple "voices." "Inner dialogue" is mirrored in the overall structure of Plato's works, and it represents the very way philosophical debate ought to be conducted.

URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::dee027c28ef301a43eabfa86a1646e20
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01975795