يعرض 1 - 10 نتائج من 127 نتيجة بحث عن '"Emmanuel Morelon"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.11s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1

    المساهمون: Institut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation [CHU Nantes] (ITERT), Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), European cohort for Kidney Transplantation Epidemiology (EKiTE), Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie - Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (U1064 Inserm - CR2TI), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Nantes Université - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (Nantes Univ - UFR MEDECINE), Nantes Université - pôle Santé, Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université - pôle Santé, Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ), Oslo University Hospital [Oslo], Réseau CENTAURE, Service Néphrologie et transplantation rénale Adultes [CHU Necker], CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Hôpital Edouard Herriot [CHU - HCL], Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Hôpital Lapeyronie [Montpellier] (CHU), Service de Néphrologie [CHRU Nancy], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Département de Néphrologie - Hôpital Pasteur [Nice], Hôpital Pasteur [Nice] (CHU), Service d'Urologie [CHU Saint-Louis], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Groupe Hospitalier Saint Louis - Lariboisière - Fernand Widal [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut de transplantation urologie-néphrologie (ITUN), Université de Nantes (UN)-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), unité de recherche de l'institut du thorax UMR1087 UMR6291 (ITX), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Nantes Université - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (Nantes Univ - UFR MEDECINE), Salvy-Córdoba, Nathalie

    المصدر: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2021, 16 (11), pp.1704-1714. ⟨10.2215/CJN.03290321⟩

    الوصف: International audience; Background and objectives The fact that metabolism and immune function are regulated by an endogenous molecular clock that generates circadian rhythms suggests that the magnitude of ischemia reperfusion, and subsequent inflammation on kidney transplantation, could be affected by the time of the day. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We evaluated 5026 individuals who received their first kidney transplant from deceased heart-beating donors. In a cause-specific multivariable analysis, we compared delayed graft function and graft survival according to the time of kidney clamping and declamping. Participants were divided into those clamped between midnight and noon ( ante meridiem [ am ] clamping group; 65%) or clamped between noon and midnight ( post meridiem [ pm ] clamping group; 35%), and, similarly, those who underwent am declamping (25%) or pm declamping (75%). Results Delayed graft function occurred among 550 participants (27%) with am clamping and 339 (34%) with pm clamping (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.98; P =0.03). No significant association was observed between clamping time and overall death-censored graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.10; P =0.37). No significant association of declamping time with delayed graft function or graft survival was observed. Conclusions Clamping between midnight and noon was associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function, whereas declamping time was not associated with kidney graft outcomes.

  2. 2

    المصدر: BJU International. 129:225-233

    الوصف: OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of expanded criteria donors (ECD) on urinary complications in kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS The UriNary Complications Of Renal Transplant (UNyCORT) is a cohort study based on the French prospective Donnees Informatisees et VAlidees en Transplantation/Computerized and VAlidated Data in Transplantation (DIVAT) cohort. Data were extracted between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2018 with 1-year minimum follow-up, in relation to 44 pre- and postoperative variables. ECD status was included according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) definition. The primary outcome of the UNyCORT study was the association between the donor's ECD/standard criteria donors (SCD) status and urinary complications at 1 year in uni- and multivariate analysis. Sub-group analysis, stratified analysis on ECD/SCD donor's status and transplant failure analysis were then conducted. RESULTS Between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2018, 10 279 kidney transplants in adult recipients were recorded within the DIVAT network. A total of 8559 (83.4%) donors were deceased donors and 1699 (16.6%) were living donors (LD). Among donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, 224 (2.85%) were uncontrolled DCD and 93 (1.09%) were controlled DCD donors. A total of 3617 (43.9%) deceased donors were ECD. The overall urological complication rate was 16.26%. The donor's ECD status was significantly associated with an increased risk of urological complications at 1 year in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.71; P

  3. 3

    المصدر: Quality of Life Research. 31:607-620

    الوصف: Kidney transplantation (KT) can impact patients’ evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as they adapt to their new life with a graft and its changes. Patients may adapt to KT in a different way, depending on whether they were on dialysis prior to transplantation or not (i.e. preemptive group). This may result in lack of measurement invariance between these patients’ groups and/or over time (i.e. response shift, RS) which may invalidate the between-group comparison of HRQoL change scores. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare RS before and after KT between these two patients’ groups. Measurement invariance was investigated between groups and over time with three measurement occasions. Adult patients completed the SF-36 at the last visit before KT, and 3, 6 months after. A structural equation model-based procedure was used to (i) detect and take into account measurement non-invariance between groups and RS, if appropriate, (ii) identify the period of occurrence of RS, (iii) study the heterogeneity of RS between the two groups. Before KT (i.e. baseline), measurement invariance was not rejected between dialyzed (n = 196) and preemptive (n = 178) patients’ groups. Between baseline and 3 months after KT, similar uniform recalibration was detected on the general health domain in both groups. Uniform recalibration was found between 3- and 6 months after KT on the vitality domain for preemptive patients only. HRQoL, adjusted for RS, increased overall for preemptive and dialyzed kidney transplant patients after transplantation. RS may reflect differing adaptation processes following KT.

  4. 4

    المصدر: Nephron. 145:692-701

    الوصف: Background: In older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the decision of kidney transplantation (KT) is a challenge for nephrologists. The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is increasingly gaining interest into the process of decision-making about treatment modality choice for CKD. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of geriatric impairment and frailty in older dialysis and nondialysis patients with advanced CKD using a pretransplant CGA model and to identify geriatric impairments influencing the geriatricians’ recommendations for KT. Methods: An observational study was conducted with retrospective data from July 2017 to January 2020. Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced CKD, treated or not with dialysis, and referred by the nephrologist were included in the study. The CGA assessed comorbidity burden, cognition, mood, nutritional status, (instrumental) activities of daily living, physical function, frailty, and polypharmacy. Geriatric impairments influencing the geriatricians’ recommendations for KT were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results: 156 patients were included (74.2 ± 3.5 years and 62.2% on dialysis). Geriatric conditions were highly prevalent in both dialysis and nondialysis groups. The rate of geriatric impairments was higher in dialysis patients regarding comorbidity burden, symptoms of depression, physical function, autonomy, and frailty. Geriatrician’s recommendations for KT were as follows: favorable (79.5%) versus not favorable or multidisciplinary discussion needed with nephrologists (20.5%). Dependence for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30–7.31), physical functions (OR = 2.91 and 95% CI = 1.08–7.87), and frailty (OR = 2.66 and 95% CI = 1.07–6.65) were found to be independent geriatric impairments influencing geriatrician’s recommendations for KT. Conclusions: Understanding the burden of geriatric impairment provides an opportunity to direct KT decision-making and to guide interventions to prevent functional decline and preserve quality of life.

  5. 5

    المصدر: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 35:1051-1059

    الوصف: BackgroundMost studies comparing the efficacy of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) versus static cold storage (SCS) are based on short-term outcomes. We aimed to better evaluate the mid-term impact of HMP in patients receiving expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys.MethodsThe analyses were based on the French Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation (DIVAT) observational cohort. Patients aged ≥45 years transplanted for the first or second times from an ECD donor since 2010 were studied. Our study reported the graft and/or patient survivals and the incidence of acute rejection episode. The Cox models and the Kaplan–Meier estimators, weighted on the propensity score, were used to study the times-to-events.ResultsAmong the 2019 included patients, 1073 were in the SCS group versus 946 in the HMP group. The mean life expectancy with functioning graft was 5.7 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.4–6.1] for the HMP cohort followed-up for 8 years post-transplantation versus 6.0 years (95% CI 5.7–6.2) for the SCS group. These mid-term results were comparable in the patients receiving grafts from donors aged ≥70 years and in the transplantations with cold ischaemia time ≥18 h.ConclusionsOur study challenges the utility of using HMP to improve mid-term patient and graft survival. Nevertheless, the improvement of the short-term outcomes is indisputable. It is necessary to continue technological innovations to obtain long-term results.

  6. 6
  7. 7

    المصدر: Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ TransplantationReferences. 34(11)

    الوصف: Background The number of patients with a history of melanoma who are waiting a solid organ transplantation (SOT) is increasing. Few recommendations exist on the timing to transplantation after melanoma diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the melanoma recurrence-free survival after pretransplant melanoma (PTM). Methods We conducted a multicenter ambispective observational study. Organ transplant recipients (OTR) with a history of PTM and complete AJCC staging were included. Results Thirty-seven patients (predominantly men with a renal allograft) were included. Five melanomas were in situ, 21 stage IA, 4 stage IB, 5 stage II and 2 stage IIIB. The median post-transplantation follow-up time was 4 years. 62% of patients were followed more than 2 years. Recurrence-free survival since melanoma reached 89.9%, but varied significantly according to AJCC staging (p=0.0129). Three patients presented a recurrence. Conclusion Despite the rather limited sample size and a wide range of follow-up, our findings concerning the recurrence-free survival appear reassuring for in situ and stage IA PTM; accordingly we suggest that a waiting time to transplantation is not mandatory in patients with in situ or stage IA PTM, especially whenever SOT I s urgently needed. Caution is however needed for patients with higher stage.

  8. 8

    المساهمون: Hôpital Edouard Herriot [CHU - HCL], Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Cellules B normales et pathogéniques - Normal and pathogenic B cell responses (NOPAB), Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie - UMR (CIRI), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine], Service Néphrologie et transplantation rénale Adultes [CHU Necker], CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Service de Néphrologie-transplantation-dialyse [Bordeaux], CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie (U1064 Inserm - CRTI), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Nantes - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (UFR MEDECINE), Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN), Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation - U 1286 (INFINITE (Ex-Liric)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), CHRU Brest - Service de Nephrologie (CHU - BREST - Nephrologie), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest), Service de néphrologie et hémodialyse [CHU de Strasbourg], CHU Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Cellules Souches, Plasticité Cellulaire, Médecine Régénératrice et Immunothérapies (IRMB), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CHU Lille, French nationwide Registry of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with COVID-19: Olivier Thaunat, Emmanuel Morelon, Charlene Levi, Fanny Buron, Alice Koenig, Thomas Barba, Sophie Caillard, Bruno Moulin, Samira Fafi-Kremer, Marc Hazzan, Anglicheau Dany, Alexandre Hertig, Jérôme Tourret, Benoit Barrou, Lionel Couzi, Pierre Merville, Anna Kaminski, Valérie Moal, Tristan Legris, Pierre-François Westeel, Maïté Jaureguy, Luc Frimat, Didier Ducloux, Jamal Bamoulid, Dominique Bertrand, Michel Tsimaratos, Florentine Garaix-Gilardo, Jérôme Dumortier, Sacha Mussot, Antoine Roux, Laurent Sebbag, Yannick Le Meur, Gilles Blancho, Christophe Masset, Nassim Kamar, Hélène Francois, Eric Rondeau, Nicolas Bouvier, Christiane Mousson, Matthias Buchler, Philippe Gatault, Jean-François Augusto, Agnès Duveau, Cécile Vigneau, Marie-Christine Morin, Jonathan Chemouny, Leonard Golbin, Philippe Grimbert, Marie Matignon, Antoine Durrbach, Clarisse Greze, Renaud Snanoudj, Charlotte Colosio, Betoul Schvartz, Paolo Malvezzi, Christophe Mariat, Antoine Thierry, Moglie Le Quintrec, Antoine Sicard, Jean Philippe Rerolle, Anne-Élisabeth Heng, Cyril Garrouste, Henri Vacher Coponat, Éric Epailly, Olivier Brugiere, Sébastien Dharancy, Éphrem Salame, Faouzi Saliba, CCSD, Accord Elsevier, École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

    المصدر: Kidney International
    Kidney International, Nature Publishing Group, 2020, 98 (6), pp.1568-1577. ⟨10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.008⟩
    Kidney International, 2020, 98 (6), pp.1568-1577. ⟨10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.008⟩

    الوصف: International audience; End stage kidney disease increase the risk of COVID-19 related death but how the kidney replacement strategy should be adapted during the pandemic is unknown. Chronic hemodialysis makes social distancing difficult to achieve. Alternatively, kidney transplantation could increase the severity of COVID-19 due to therapeutic immunosuppression and contribute to saturation of intensive care units. For these reasons, kidney transplantation was suspended in France during the first epidemic wave. Here, we retrospectively evaluated this strategy by comparing the overall and COVID-19 related mortality in kidney transplant recipients and candidates over the last three years. Cross-interrogation of two national registries for the period 1 March and 1 June 2020, identified 275 deaths among the 42812 kidney transplant recipients and 144 deaths among the 16210 candidates. This represents an excess of deaths for both populations, as compared with the same period the two previous years (mean of two previous years: 253 in recipients and 112 in candidates). This difference was integrally explained by COVID-19, which accounted for 44% (122) and 42% (60) of the deaths in recipients and candidates, respectively. Taking into account the size of the two populations and the geographical heterogeneity of virus circulation, we found that the excess of risk of death due to COVID-19 was similar for recipients and candidates in high viral risk area but four-fold higher for candidates in the low viral risk area. Thus, in case of a second epidemic wave, kidney transplantation should be suspended in high viral risk areas but maintained outside those areas, both to reduce the excess of deaths of candidates and avoid wasting precious resources.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  9. 9

    المساهمون: Immuno-Rhumatologie Moléculaire, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Necker Enfants-Malades (INEM - UM 111 (UMR 8253 / U1151)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), CHU Tenon [AP-HP], Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-IFR10-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), Hôpital Foch [Suresnes], CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Hôpital Edouard Herriot [CHU - HCL], Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Epidemiologie Clinique/essais Cliniques Nancy, Cancéropôle du Grand Est-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), CHU Amiens-Picardie, Université de Tours, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Hôpital de la Conception [CHU - APHM] (LA CONCEPTION), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Université de Bourgogne (UB), Université de Montpellier (UM), Hôpital Pasteur [Nice] (CHU), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU), Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Centre d'Investigation Clinique [Rennes] (CIC), Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail (Irset), Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] (EHESP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes ( Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique ), École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] (EHESP), Université d'Angers (UA), Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM), Université de Limoges (UNILIM), Université de Poitiers, Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Lymphocyte B et Auto-immunité (LBAI), Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Brestois Santé Agro Matière (IBSAM), Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), CHU Lille, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Université de Tours (UT), Microbes évolution phylogénie et infections (MEPHI), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Toulouse (UT), Université de Rennes (UR)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Rennes (UR)-École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] (EHESP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes ( Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique ), Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM), Lymphocytes B, Autoimmunité et Immunothérapies (LBAI), Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-LabEX IGO Immunothérapie Grand Ouest, Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Institut Brestois Santé Agro Matière (IBSAM), Université de Brest (UBO), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Cellules Souches, Plasticité Cellulaire, Médecine Régénératrice et Immunothérapies (IRMB), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-IFR10, Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes ( Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique )-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] (EHESP)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université d'Angers (UA), Jonchère, Laurent

    المصدر: Kidney International Reports
    Kidney International Reports, Elsevier, 2021, 6 (10), pp.2689-2693. ⟨10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.034⟩
    Kidney International Reports, 2021, 6 (10), pp.2689-2693. ⟨10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.034⟩

    الوصف: International audience

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  10. 10

    المصدر: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 36

    الوصف: Background and Aims IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) often recurs on kidney transplants, accounting for a significant specific kidney failure occurrence after ten years of transplantation vintage. Polyclonal anti-T-lymphocyte antibodies (PATLA) immunosuppressive induction has been shown to be associated with a lower rate of IgAN recurrence compared to basiliximab and no induction in a retrospective study. The aim of the PIRAT study was to compare an induction by PATLA versus basiliximab by the mean of a randomized controlled trial. Method Adults with biopsy-proven primary IgAN as primary cause of end stage of renal disease, first transplantation, panel reactive antibody 300mg/d during 5 years post-transplantation. Protocol biopsy at 5 years was highly recommended. Results A total of 117 patients were finally included in 13 French transplant centers, with 60 patients in the PATLA group and 57 in the basiliximab control group. Both groups were similar (median, PATLA vs. basiliximab, p>0.05 wilcoxon test) in term of sex ratio (4.45 vs 4.57), recipient age (47.9 vs. 47.7 years old), dialysis vintage (26.2 vs. 24.6 months), age at IgAN diagnosis (35.0 vs. 42.2 years old), cold ischemia (780 min vs 682 min), warm ischemia (34 vs. 36.1min), proportion of living donors (33% vs. 25%). The 5-year protocol biopsy was performed on 48% vs. 45% of patients, with overall proportion of patients evaluated by at least one biopsy of 63% vs. 66%. A trend in favor to the protection by PATLA from the occurrence of a clinico-histological recurrence was found (hazard ratio, univariate Cox model 0,35 [0.11-1.1], p=0.082). Biopsy proven histological recurrence was significantly lower after PATLA induction (HR 0.34 [0.16-0.76], p=0.0079). PATLA group experienced more infections (40 vs. 28 p=0.06), a lower number of graft losses (3 vs 9, p=0.07), a lower number of biopsy-proven acute rejections (5 vs 10, p=0.17). Similar rates of cytomegalovirus and BK virus infections were found. Conclusion PATLA for immunosuppressive induction was found protective from the recurrence of IgA deposition during the first 5 years after transplantation, compared to basiliximab. A similar trend, although not significant, was found about the clinico-histological recurrence which was the predefined primary outcome.