-
1Historical Course and Deficiencies of Comparative Interpretation from the 4th to the 6th Century A.H
المؤلفون: Mohammad Kazem Shaker, Ensiyeh Asgari
المصدر: Āfāq-i Dīn, Vol 8, Iss 30, Pp 7-28 (2017)
مصطلحات موضوعية: while also giving rise to the transparency of the exegetical views of the Shi’a and Sunni commentators, and subsequent commentators have compensated for the weaknesses of previous interpreters. Examples that have been examined in this study include points that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the comparative interpretation, the Fifth and Sixth Centuries. In this essay, Comparative Interpretation, Exegetical Methods, Exegetical Approaches, History Of Interpretation, Shi’a-Sunni Interpretation, lcsh:Islam, a comparative Shiite-Sunni approach has led to inferential interpretations, criticized these views. The results of this research show that with the simultaneously development of two knowledge of theology and jurisprudence in the Middle Centuries A.H, and in both schools there has been evolutionary development, can be one of the manifestations of such studies. The particular religious thought of the Quran commentators has led to the production of different exegetical products, some of the most controversial verses among jurisprudents and theologians of Shi’a and Sunni have been selected and the viewpoints of a commentator of a cult in comparison to another cult commentator have been evaluated. The authors of this paper seek to answer the question of what the characteristics are in the comparative approach in the relevant commentaries and what each commentator has looked at, and by what criteria, including the interpretation of the Quran, so that the effect of the two schools of Shi’a and Sunni on the interpretation of some verses - especially theological and jurisprudential verses- is undeniable. Applying a comparative approach in interpreting these two kinds of Quranic verses, lcsh:B, will increase the knowledge of the interpretation and selection of stronger views by Quran exegetes. The present paper seeks to study the beginning of the comparative approach to the interpretation and evolution of it through the study of the most important inferential interpretations of the Fourth, which could be a light for commentators, lcsh:Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, lcsh:BP1-253
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doajarticles::35799cea873d08b35ef00a4cafdcd7cb
http://rjqk.atu.ac.ir/article_8718_80b45e5be5753c3e72aa16508e378f7b.pdf -
2
المؤلفون: Muhammet ABAY
المصدر: Volume: 9, Issue: 15 33-54
Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol 9, Iss 15, Pp 33-54 (2007)مصطلحات موضوعية: Tefsirciler, lcsh:BL1-2790, lcsh:Islam. Bahai Faith. Theosophy, etc, Veritabanı, lcsh:Religions. Mythology. Rationalism, Tefsirciler,Müfessirler,Tabakatü’l-Müfessirin,Veritabanı,Tefsir tarihi, Tabakatü’l-Müfessirin, lcsh:BP1-610, Social, Müfessirler, lcsh:B, Mufassirs, Quran Commentators, Tabaqat al-Mufassirin, Database, History of tafsir, Tefsir tarihi, lcsh:Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, Sosyal
وصف الملف: application/pdf
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::85f41001ab73b4dc3e7fc842562d689f
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sakaifd/issue/20606/219584