يعرض 1 - 10 نتائج من 62 نتيجة بحث عن '"criticized"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.09s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    دورية أكاديمية

    المؤلفون: Onurcan Yilmaz, S. Adil Saribay

    المصدر: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 140-147 (2017)

    مصطلحات موضوعية: The present research investigated the reason for mixed evidence concerning the relationship between analytic cognitive style (ACS) and political orientation in previous research. Most past research operationalized ACS with the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), which has been criticized as relying heavily on numeracy skills, and operationalized political orientation with the single-item self-placement measure, which has been criticized as masking the distinction between social and economic conservatism. The present research recruited an Amazon Mechanical Turk sample and, for the first time, simultaneously employed three separate ACS measures (CRT, CRT2, Baserate conflict problems), a measure of attitudes toward self-critical and reflective thinking (the Actively Open-Minded Thinking Scale, AOT), and separate measures of social and economic conservatism, as well the standard measure of political orientation. As expected, the total ACS score (combination of the separate measures) was negatively related to social, but not economic, conservatism. However, the CRT by itself was not related to conservatism, in parallel with some past findings, while the two other measures of ACS showed the same pattern as the combined score. Trait reflectiveness (AOT) was related negatively to all measures of political conservatism (social, economic, and general). Results clearly suggest that the conclusion reached regarding the ACS-political orientation relationship depends on the measure(s) used, with the measure most commonly employed in past research (CRT) behaving differently than other measures. Future research must further pursue the implications of the known differences (e.g., reliance on numeracy vs.\ verbal skills) of ACS measures and distinguish different senses of reflectiveness. % changes in abstract Keywords, Social Sciences, Psychology, BF1-990

    وصف الملف: electronic resource

  6. 6
  7. 7
    دورية أكاديمية
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    المصدر: Āfāq-i Dīn, Vol 8, Iss 30, Pp 7-28 (2017)

    مصطلحات موضوعية: while also giving rise to the transparency of the exegetical views of the Shi’a and Sunni commentators, and subsequent commentators have compensated for the weaknesses of previous interpreters. Examples that have been examined in this study include points that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the comparative interpretation, the Fifth and Sixth Centuries. In this essay, Comparative Interpretation, Exegetical Methods, Exegetical Approaches, History Of Interpretation, Shi’a-Sunni Interpretation, lcsh:Islam, a comparative Shiite-Sunni approach has led to inferential interpretations, criticized these views. The results of this research show that with the simultaneously development of two knowledge of theology and jurisprudence in the Middle Centuries A.H, and in both schools there has been evolutionary development, can be one of the manifestations of such studies. The particular religious thought of the Quran commentators has led to the production of different exegetical products, some of the most controversial verses among jurisprudents and theologians of Shi’a and Sunni have been selected and the viewpoints of a commentator of a cult in comparison to another cult commentator have been evaluated. The authors of this paper seek to answer the question of what the characteristics are in the comparative approach in the relevant commentaries and what each commentator has looked at, and by what criteria, including the interpretation of the Quran, so that the effect of the two schools of Shi’a and Sunni on the interpretation of some verses - especially theological and jurisprudential verses- is undeniable. Applying a comparative approach in interpreting these two kinds of Quranic verses, lcsh:B, will increase the knowledge of the interpretation and selection of stronger views by Quran exegetes. The present paper seeks to study the beginning of the comparative approach to the interpretation and evolution of it through the study of the most important inferential interpretations of the Fourth, which could be a light for commentators, lcsh:Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, lcsh:BP1-253