-
1
المؤلفون: DE PROPRIS, Luigi
مصطلحات موضوعية: processo esecutivo, n. 61, Cass. (ord.) 3 gennaio 2023, interesse moratorio, art. 1284, domanda condanna, Cass. (ord.) 3 gennaio 2023, n. 61
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3686::85d1eee405bf2b992582d6242c36704e
https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1680456 -
2
المصدر: Repositório Institucional do STJ
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)
instacron:STJمصطلحات موضوعية: Multa (Direito Tributário), Brasil. [Lei n. 9.430, de 27 de setembro de 1996. Art. n. 61], Brasil. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), jurisprudência, Princípio da proporcionalidade, Sanção tributária, Multa de ofício, Individualização da pena, Brasil. [Constituição (1988). Art. n. 150, IV], Multa tributária, multa agravada, Multa fiscal, jurisprudência, Multa de mora, Multa isolada, Princípio da proibição do excesso, Princípio dos princípios, Responsabilidade tributária, Brasil. [Lei n. 5.172, de 25 de outubro de 1966. Art. n. 136], multa qualificada, Brasil. [Código Tributário Nacional (1966). Art. n. 136]
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::e0e17715b11ae0166d0e09e7e3309c63
http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/106254 -
3
المؤلفون: RUSSO, Federico
المساهمون: Russo, F
مصطلحات موضوعية: b) the same par condicio creditorum principle, and the consequent possibility of intervention of third party in the execution. It concludes, however, that a revolution like the aforesaid explained would be only apparently advantageou, Old and new problems related to the intervention of creditors in the expropriation (marginal notes at Cass. Sez. Un., January 7, 2014, n. 61) Moving from the decision of the Sezioni Unite n. 61/2014, the author takes the opportunity to re-examine old and new problems related to the intervention of creditors in the forceable execution. The first major theme concerns par condicio creditorum, which is examined in its evolutionary history since the Code Napoleon, through its period of maximum extension (the Code of 1940), until its reduction as a result of the reforms of 2005. The author examines the possibility to overcome, quoad effectum, the distinction between sine titulo et cum titulo interveners in light of jurisprudence’s evolution between 1978, 2009 and 2014. The possibility in particular concerns those creditors sine titulo the where credit has not been contested (ex art. 499 c.p.c.) by the debtor seek payment, and partecipate to distribution. In the last section the author examines the possibilities for other creditors to contest the intervention of the creditor sine titulo, ex art. 499 c.p.c. (utendo iuribus, in subrogation in case of inaction of the debtor), or in the distribution phase, ex art. 512 c.p.c. He concludes that the only person that will be really damaged if he doesn’t contest - ex art. 499 c.p.c. - the credit it is precisely the debtor. He also notes that in the legislation of the last decade the apparent effort to reduce the numbers of judicial enquiry, incidental to forceable execution, will never be achieved unless it’s eliminated in radice: a) the existence in our system of extrajudicial enforcement titula, Settore IUS/15 - Diritto Processuale Civile, since it would lead to increase autonomous expropriations (one for each creditor, who can, today, intervene), and to increment judicial enquiries in order to form enforceable judgments
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3658::68259c52c50d1f8be0fb2841d01f1e6a
http://hdl.handle.net/10447/144920 -
4
المؤلفون: Sabarando, José Fernando Marreiros
المصدر: Repositório Institucional do STJ
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)
instacron:STJمصطلحات موضوعية: Brasil. [Decreto-lei n. 3.689, de 03 de outubro de 1941. Art. n. 107, 108], jurisprudência, Absolvição, jurisprudência, Extinção da punibilidade, jurisprudência, Pretensão, jurisprudência, Brasil. [Código de Processo Penal (1941). Art. n. 61], jurisprudência, Brasil. [Decreto-lei n. 2.848, de 07 de dezembro de 1940. Art. n. 61], jurisprudência, Pretensão jurídica, jurisprudência, Brasil. [Código Penal (1940). Art. n. 107, 108], jurisprudência
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::7aeb5294aa173ec1c5029cb57b7ca81d
http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/106552 -
5
المساهمون: Zamenhofa Federacio
المصدر: 2173-5581
-
6
المصدر: 2173-2736
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
