المؤلفون: Daniel Pascual, Pilar Mur-Dueñas

المصدر: Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, Vol 90 (2022)

مصطلحات موضوعية: research Twitter accounts, dialogicity, engagement markers, interactional pragmatic strategies, Philology. Linguistics, P1-1091

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/view/81307; https://doaj.org/toc/1576-4737

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/4c159133831c41d78f0b2a13132abde2

لا يتم عرض هذه النتيجة على الضيوف.
تسجيل الدخول للوصول الكامل.

المصدر: Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación; Vol. 90 (2022): Monográfico “Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional”; 61-79; Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación; Vol. 90 (2022): Monográfico “Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional”; 61-79; 1576-4737

مصطلحات الفهرس: research Twitter accounts, dialogicity, engagement markers, interactional pragmatic strategies, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

URL: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/view/81307
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/view/81307/4564456560233
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/view/81307/4564456560233
*ref*/Adami, E. (2015). What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity. Visual Communication, 14(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214565583
*ref*/Askehave, I. and Nielsen, A. (2005). Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology & People 18(2), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601504.
*ref*/Baykoucheva, S. (2015). Managing Scientific Information and Research Data. Waltham, Massachusetts: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100195-0.00009-3
*ref*/Bik, H.M. and Goldstein, M.C. (2013). An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biology 11(4), e1001535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535
*ref*/Bondi, M. (2018a). Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert action games. In Weigand, E., Kovecses, I. (eds.), From Pragmatics to Dialogue (pp. 137–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon
*ref*/Bondi, M. (2018b). Try to prove me wrong: Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs. Discourse, Context & Media 24, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011
*ref*/boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi, (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
*ref*/Corona, I. (2021). A window to the world: Visual design and research visibility of European research projects’ homepages. Disseminating Knowledge. Special issue of European Journal of English Studies 25(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1988261
*ref*/Danesi, M. (2017). The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282024
*ref*/Draucker, F. and Collister, L.B. (2015). Managing participation through modal affordances on Twitter. Open Library of Humanities 1(1), e8. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.21
*ref*/Eysenbach G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(4), e123. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012
*ref*/Flowerdew, J. (2014). Foreword. In L. Gil-Salom and C. Soler-Monreal (Eds.), Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres (pp. ix–xvi). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.01for
*ref*/Gil-Salom, L. and Soler-Monreal, C. (2014). Introduction. In L. Gil-Salom and C. Soler-Monreal (Eds.), Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres (pp. vi–vii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.00intro
*ref*/Gruber, H. (2017). Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse. Discourse, Context and Media 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.005
*ref*/Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
*ref*/Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
*ref*/Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. (2011). The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons 54(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.004
*ref*/Kejriwal, M., Wang, Q., Li, H. and Wang, L. (2021). An empirical study of emoji usage on Twitter in linguistic and national contexts. Online Social Networks and Media 24, 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100149
*ref*/Kent, M. L. and Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review 24(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
*ref*/Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. and Silvestre, B. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons 54(3), 241–251.
*ref*/Koester, A. (2010). Building small specialised corpora. In A. O’Keeffe and M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 66–79). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-6
*ref*/Kuteeva, M. (2016). Research blogs, wikis and tweets. In K. Hyland and P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 433–445). London: Routledge.
*ref*/Lee, M.K., Yoon, H.Y., Smith, M., Park, H. J. and Park, H. W. (2017). Mapping a Twitter scholarly communication network: A case of the association of internet researchers’ conference. Scientometrics 112(2), 767–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2413-z
*ref*/Lorés, R. (2020). Science on the web: The exploration of European research websites of energy-related projects as digital genres for the promotion of value. Discourse, Context & Media 35, 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100389
*ref*/Lorés-Sanz, R. and Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2020). New concepts, different approaches: Tackling e-visibility in research project websites. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 15, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2020.12782
*ref*/Luzón, M.J. and Albero-Posac, S. (2020). ‘Had a lovely week at #conference2018’: An analysis of interaction through conference tweets. RELC Journal 51(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219896862
*ref*/Mazarakis, A. and Peters, I. (2015). Science 2.0 and conference tweets: What? where? why? when? Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 13(4), 269–282.
*ref*/Mur-Dueñas, P. (2021). Engagement markers in research project websites: Promoting interactivity and dialogicity. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2021-0023
*ref*/Myers, G. (2016). Everyday oracles: authors on Twitter. Celebrity Studies 7(4), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1233708.
*ref*/Pascual, D. (2019a). Twitter in H2020 websites: A pragmatic study of scientific research groups networking. Paper presented at 2nd ADDA (Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis) Conference. University of Turku, Finland, 23th-25th May 2019.
*ref*/Pascual, D. (2019b). Communicating science online: Pragmatic strategies in digital genres belonging to H2020 scientific projects. Paper presented at I Predoctoral Seminar on English Studies (SEING I), Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain, 10th May 2019.
*ref*/Pascual, D., Mur-Dueñas, P. and Lorés, R. (2020). Looking into international research groups' digital discursive practices: Criteria and methodological steps taken towards the compilation of the EUROPRO digital corpus. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.05
*ref*/Puschmann, C. (2015). A digital mob in the ivory tower? Context collapse in scholarly communication online. In M. Bondi, S. Cacchiani and D. Mazzi (Eds.), Discourse in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse (pp. 22–45). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
*ref*/Roele, M., Ward, J. and van Duijn, M. (2020). Tweet with a smile: The selection and use of emoji on Twitter in the Netherlands and England. First Monday 25(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i4.9373
*ref*/Rühlemann, C. and Clancy, B. (2018). Corpus linguistics and pragmatics. In C. Ilie and N.R. Norrick (Eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.11ruh
*ref*/Sifianou, M. and Bella, S. (2019). Twitter, politeness, self-presentation. In P. Bou-Franch and P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analysing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions (pp. 341–365). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_12
*ref*/Scott, K. (2015). The pragmatics of hashtags. Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 81, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015
*ref*/Squires, L. (2016). Twitter. Design, discourse and the implications of public text. In A. Georgakopoulou and T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication (pp. 239–255). London: Routledge.
*ref*/Vaughan, E. and Clancy, B. (2013). Small corpora and pragmatics. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), The Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics (pp. 53–73). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6250-3_4
*ref*/Vela Delfa, C. (2020). Una aproximación semiótica al estudio de los emojis. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 84, 153–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/clac.70560
*ref*/van den Hoonaard, W. (2008). Inter- and intracoder reliability. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 445–446). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
*ref*/Wang, Y. and Yang, Y. (2020). Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
*ref*/Weller, K. and Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: How can citations/references be identified and measured? WebSci '11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, 1–4. Retrieved from https://websci11.org/fileadmin/websci/Posters/153_paper.pdf 14/12/2021.
*ref*/Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. New York: Continuum.