دورية أكاديمية

Effects of six warm-up protocols on sprint and jump performance.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effects of six warm-up protocols on sprint and jump performance.
المؤلفون: Vetter RE; Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance Department, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, Missouri 64468, USA. rvetter@nwmissouri.edu
المصدر: Journal of strength and conditioning research [J Strength Cond Res] 2007 Aug; Vol. 21 (3), pp. 819-23.
نوع المنشور: Comparative Study; Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Human Kinetics Pub Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9415084 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1064-8011 (Print) Linking ISSN: 10648011 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Strength Cond Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics Pub., c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Movement/*physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/*physiology , Physical Education and Training/*methods , Running/*physiology, Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Female ; Humans ; Leg/physiology ; Male
مستخلص: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 6 warm-up protocols, with and without stretches, on 2 different power maneuvers: a 30-m sprint run and a vertical countermovement jump (CJ). The 6 protocols were: (a) walk plus run (WR); (b) WR plus exercises including small jumps (EJ); (c) WR plus dynamic active stretch plus exercises with small jumps (DAEJ); (d) WR plus dynamic active stretch (DA); (e) WR plus static stretch plus exercises with small jumps (SSEJ); and (f) WR plus static stretch (SS). Twenty-six college-age men (n = 14) and women (n = 12) performed each of 6 randomly ordered exercise routines prior to randomly ordered sprint and vertical jump field tests; each routine and subsequent tests were performed on separate days. A 2 x 6 repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant overall linear trend (p < or = 0.05) with a general tendency toward reduction in jump height when examined in the following analysis entry order: WR, EJ, DAEJ, DA, SSEJ, and SS. The post hoc analysis pairwise comparisons showed the WR protocol produced higher jumps than did SS (p = 0.003 < or = 0.05), and DAEJ produced higher jumps than did SS (p = 0.009 < or = 0.05). There were no significant differences among the 6 protocols on sprint run performance (p > or = 0.05). No significant interaction occurred between gender and protocol. There were significant differences between men and women on CJ and sprint trials; as expected, in general men ran faster and jumped higher than the women did. The data indicate that a warm-up including static stretching may negatively impact jump performance, but not sprint time.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20070810 Date Completed: 20071108 Latest Revision: 20161018
رمز التحديث: 20240628
DOI: 10.1519/R-20296.1
PMID: 17685698
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1064-8011
DOI:10.1519/R-20296.1