دورية أكاديمية

Assessing joint space and condylar position in the people with normal function of temporomandibular joint with cone-beam computed tomography.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Assessing joint space and condylar position in the people with normal function of temporomandibular joint with cone-beam computed tomography.
المؤلفون: Dalili Z; Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Guilan, Iran., Khaki N, Kia SJ, Salamat F
المصدر: Dental research journal [Dent Res J (Isfahan)] 2012 Sep; Vol. 9 (5), pp. 607-12.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Medknow Country of Publication: Iran NLM ID: 101471186 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1735-3327 (Print) Linking ISSN: 17353327 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Dent Res J (Isfahan) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Mumbai : Medknow
Original Publication: Isfahan, Iran : Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Torabinejad Dental Research Center
مستخلص: Background: The optimal position of the condyle in glenoid fossa is a fundamental question in dentistry. There is no quantitative standard for the optimal position of mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa in our population. The purpose of this study is to assess the position of the condyle by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in patient with normal function of temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, CBCT images of 40 class I skeletal patients (15 males and 25 females) without history of TMJ disorders were selected. Next, the anterior, superior and posterior joint spaces (Ajs, Sjs, Pjs) were measured on the two true central sagittal slices. Then medial (M) and lateral (L) joint spaces on true coronal view were measured in the right and left sides, separately. After that, P/A ratio, S/A ratio and M/L ratio were calculated. Finally, a paired t-test and independent samples t-test were employed for analysis.
Results: The centric position of the condyle in glenoid fossa was more common (92.5%) than other positions. Significant differences in Ajs, Sjs, Pjs, Mjs and Ljs values between two sides were observed (P ≤ 0.05). Additionally, Sjs showed statistically significant differences between the sexes (P = 0.05). P/A ratio and S/A ratio had significant differences between two sides but not between those sexes.
Conclusion: The assessment of joint spaces in right and left sides should be done independently. Overall, the measured joint spaces except Sjs are not different in two sexes. The data from this study could be a useful and comparable reference for the clinical assessment of condylar position in patients with normal functional joints.
References: Acta Odontol Scand. 1977 May;35(2):77-83. (PMID: 266827)
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 May;31(5):438-44. (PMID: 15140169)
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Oct;45(10):852-4. (PMID: 3477621)
Angle Orthod. 2000 Feb;70(1):70-80. (PMID: 10730678)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Nov;122(5):486-90. (PMID: 12439476)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):337-46. (PMID: 16168330)
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Sep;33(5):291-4. (PMID: 15585804)
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Jul;88(1):106-11. (PMID: 10442954)
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Nov;30(11):1070-5. (PMID: 14641670)
Dent Today. 2006 Nov;25(11):130, 132-5. (PMID: 17128717)
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jan;37(1):10-7. (PMID: 18195249)
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 May;33(3):196-201. (PMID: 15371321)
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jan;62(1):39-43. (PMID: 14699547)
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1966 May;4(3):273-88. (PMID: 5941956)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jul;126(1):48-52. (PMID: 15224058)
J Orofac Pain. 1997 Winter;11(1):37-47. (PMID: 10332309)
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5(4):34-61. (PMID: 3864761)
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Sep;51(3):269-73. (PMID: 15294336)
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):228-31. (PMID: 15101594)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Sep;104(3):230-9. (PMID: 8362784)
Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):27-35. (PMID: 8678342)
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Nov;33(6):391-5. (PMID: 15665233)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 May;105(5):483-8. (PMID: 8166098)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):328-36. (PMID: 9743139)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):495-501. (PMID: 19361736)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):619-30. (PMID: 16679202)
J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Apr;49(4):532-45. (PMID: 6573501)
J Dent Res. 2004 Jun;83(6):480-4. (PMID: 15153456)
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Aug;106(2):e52-63. (PMID: 18547834)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Mar;109(3):249-62. (PMID: 8607470)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Cone beam CT; mandibular condyle; temporomandibular joint
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20130406 Date Completed: 20130408 Latest Revision: 20220408
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC3612199
DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.104881
PMID: 23559927
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE