دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

[Comparison of various topical sun protection formulations, based on cosmetic vs medical device status, using in vitro methods to assess their efficacy, photo-stability and water resistance].

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: [Comparison of various topical sun protection formulations, based on cosmetic vs medical device status, using in vitro methods to assess their efficacy, photo-stability and water resistance].
عنوان ترانسليتريتد: Comparaison de produits de protection solaire ayant un statut de cosmétique ou de dispositif médical par détermination de leur efficacité, de leur photo-stabilité et de leur résistance à l'eau grâce à une méthode in vitro.
المؤلفون: Couteau C; LPiC, MMS, EA2160, faculté de pharmacie, université de Nantes, Nantes Atlantique Universités, 9, rue Bias, BP 53508, 44000 Nantes, France., Paparis E; LPiC, MMS, EA2160, faculté de pharmacie, université de Nantes, Nantes Atlantique Universités, 9, rue Bias, BP 53508, 44000 Nantes, France., Coiffard LJ; LPiC, MMS, EA2160, faculté de pharmacie, université de Nantes, Nantes Atlantique Universités, 9, rue Bias, BP 53508, 44000 Nantes, France. Electronic address: laurence.coiffard@univ-nantes.fr.
المصدر: Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie [Ann Dermatol Venereol] 2016 Feb; Vol. 143 (2), pp. 124-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 21.
نوع المنشور: Comparative Study; Journal Article
اللغة: French
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Masson Country of Publication: France NLM ID: 7702013 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0151-9638 (Print) Linking ISSN: 01519638 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann Dermatol Venereol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Paris, New York, Masson.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Sunscreening Agents/*chemistry, Humans ; Spectrophotometry ; Sun Protection Factor
مستخلص: Background: Within the European Union, sun protection products have long been considered cosmetics whereas in other parts of the world, such as the United States, they are considered as medicinal products. In France, sun protection products with medical device status have recently appeared. Our aim was to compare medical and cosmetic sun protection products.
Materials and Methods: We subjected 4 sun protection products to in vitro testing in order to determine their efficacy in the UVB and UVA ranges, as well as their photo-stability and water resistance. We tested two cosmetic products (Dépiwhite S Soin photoprotecteur(®) SPF 50+ and Urgo cicatrices(®) SPF 30) and two class I medical devices (MD) (Actinica lotion(®) and Kelocote UV(®) Gel for scars). The main in vitro method used involved measuring the transmittance of a sample of each product applied to a dish containing poly(methyl methacrylate) using a spectrophotometer with integrating spheres. This method enabled us to determine the SPF of the various products as well as their photo-stability and degree of water resistance.
Results: Regarding efficacy, three of the four test products met the European recommendations governing sun protection products, i.e. a ratio between UVB and UVA protection of 3 or less, and a critical wavelength (λc) of 370 nm or higher. Actinica lotion(®) was the more effective of the two medical devices tested, and was also the most photo-stable, at least within the UVB range. All four products tested were water-resistant.
Discussion: The products tested, while having different status and different claims, exhibited equivalent filtration properties under the study conditions.
(Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Cosmetics; Cosmétiques; Dispositifs médicaux; FP-UVA; Medical devices; Photo-stability; Photo-stabilité; Produits solaires; Résistance à l’eau; SPF; Sun protection products; Water resistance
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Sunscreening Agents)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20160101 Date Completed: 20161219 Latest Revision: 20161230
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2015.08.010
PMID: 26718902
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:0151-9638
DOI:10.1016/j.annder.2015.08.010