دورية أكاديمية
Towards coherent data policy for biomedical research with ELSI 2.0: orchestrating ethical, legal and social strategies.
| العنوان: | Towards coherent data policy for biomedical research with ELSI 2.0: orchestrating ethical, legal and social strategies. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Woolley JP; HeLEX - Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies at Oxford. Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. |
| المصدر: | Journal of medical ethics [J Med Ethics] 2017 Nov; Vol. 43 (11), pp. 741-743. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 May 08. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7513619 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1473-4257 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03066800 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Med Ethics Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: <2004->: London : BMJ Publishing Group Original Publication: London, Society for the Study of Medical Ethics. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Policy Making* , Public Policy*, Biomedical Research/*ethics , Data Collection/*ethics , Information Dissemination/*ethics , Information Technology/*ethics, Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence ; Data Collection/legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Information Dissemination/legislation & jurisprudence ; Information Technology/legislation & jurisprudence ; Trust |
| مستخلص: | As the recent inaugural Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) 2.0 conference made clear, the effects of information communication technology (ICT) are pervasive in biomedical research. Data initiatives are arising in all corners of biomedicine. Data sharing efforts already promised to surpass even the ambitious goals of the National Human Genome Research Institute, only 5 years after publication of its 10-year vision. ELSI research was established, in part, to address challenges of open data access and data sharing. However, by and large, ELSI research projects address particular concerns of a given population, jurisdiction, type of research practice or type of data. This does not necessarily facilitate coherent data policy for sustainable data stewardship. Forward-looking, data friendly strategies need to be considered. Orchestration strategies are needed which overcome barriers to collective action. Here we present challenges policymakers face, and suggest three basics steps towards meeting them. First, policymakers must recognise the systematic change that occurs when ICT enables dataflow itself to become an organising principle of biomedical research. Second, methods for identifying and gathering types of metadata suitable for ELSI research ought to be developed and regulated. Third, policymakers need to organise in ways that mirror the new vision for data-enabled research that data technologies are making possible, as ELSI 2.0 encourages researchers to do. Taking these steps will help ensure research evolves in ways that warrants trust of the public while still supporting widespread ethical access to necessary data, research subjects, samples and findings. Competing Interests: Competing interests: This article was written as part of postdoctoral research done at HeLEX, which is a leading advocate and organiser of ELSI 2.0. The author is currently a Research Associate of HeLEX. (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Ethics; Information Technology; Law; Public Policy; Regulation |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20170510 Date Completed: 20180716 Latest Revision: 20181211 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/medethics-2015-103068 |
| PMID: | 28483804 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1473-4257 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1136/medethics-2015-103068 |