Editorial & Opinion

Why mutualist partners vary in quality: mutation-selection balance and incentives to cheat in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Why mutualist partners vary in quality: mutation-selection balance and incentives to cheat in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.
المؤلفون: Jandér KC; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 9100 Box 0948, DPO, AA, 34002-9998, USA., Steidinger BS; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
المصدر: Ecology letters [Ecol Lett] 2017 Jul; Vol. 20 (7), pp. 922-932. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 13.
نوع المنشور: Letter
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101121949 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1461-0248 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1461023X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ecol Lett Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing
Original Publication: Oxford, UK : [Paris, France] : Blackwell Science ; Centre national de la recherche scientifique, c1998-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Ficus* , Symbiosis* , Wasps*, Animals ; Mutation ; Trees
مستخلص: Mutualisms between species are ecologically ubiquitous but evolutionarily puzzling. Host discrimination mechanisms that reduce the fitness of uncooperative symbionts can stabilise mutualism against collapse, but also present a paradox - if discrimination is effective, why do uncooperative symbionts persist? Here, we test whether mutations or fitness benefits of cheating best explain the prevalence of uncooperative wasps in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism. By combining theory with field-collected data we demonstrate that the proportions of pollen-free wasps of strongly discriminating hosts are reached with reasonable mutation rates. In contrast, in weakly discriminating hosts, the required mutation rates, assuming a single locus, are untenably high, but the required cheater advantages fall within expected ranges. We propose that when discrimination is weak, uncooperative symbionts proliferate until they reach the equilibrium proportion that balances costs and benefits of cheating. Our results suggest that mechanisms that resolve the paradox of uncooperative symbionts differ among host species.
(© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.)
التعليقات: Erratum in: Ecol Lett. 2017 Sep;20(9):1216. (PMID: 28797139)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Conflict; cooperation; host sanctions; mutualism; partner choice
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20170615 Date Completed: 20171208 Latest Revision: 20181202
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12792
PMID: 28612473
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1461-0248
DOI:10.1111/ele.12792