دورية أكاديمية

A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018.
المؤلفون: Stoops CA; Mosquito Authority Laboratories, Green Cove Springs, FL, USA., Qualls WA; Zoonosis Control Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA., Nguyen TT; Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Disease Team, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA., Richards SL; Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
المصدر: Environmental health insights [Environ Health Insights] 2019 Jun 26; Vol. 13, pp. 1178630219859004. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 26 (Print Publication: 2019).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: SAGE Publications Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101488505 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1178-6302 (Print) Linking ISSN: 11786302 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Health Insights Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2016- > : Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE Publications
Original Publication: [Auckland, New Zealand] : Libertas Academica, 2008-
مستخلص: Background and Purpose: Barrier insecticide treatments have a long history in mosquito control programs but have been used more frequently in the United States in recent years for control of invasive "backyard" species (eg, Aedes albopictus ) and increases in incidence of vector-borne diseases (eg, Zika).
Methods: We reviewed the published literature for studies investigating barrier treatments for mosquito control during the last 74 years (1944-2018). We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to retrieve worldwide literature on barrier treatments.
Results: Forty-four studies that evaluated 20 active ingredients (AIs) and 21 formulated products against multiple mosquito species are included. Insecticides investigated for efficacy included organochlorines (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT], β-hexachlorocyclohexane [BHC]), organophosphates (malathion), and pyrethroids (bifenthrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin) as AIs. Study design varied with multiple methods used to evaluate effectiveness of barrier treatments. Barrier treatments were effective at lowering mosquito populations although there was variation between studies and for different mosquito species. Factors other than AI, such as exposure to rainfall and application equipment used, also influenced control efficacy.
Conclusions: Many of the basic questions on the effectiveness of barrier insecticide applications have been answered, but several important details still must be investigated to improve precision and impact on vector-borne pathogen transmission. Recommendations are made to assist future evaluations of barrier treatments for mosquito control and to limit the potential development of insecticide resistance.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References: J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2010 Dec;26(4):422-9. (PMID: 21290938)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015 Mar;31(1):85-92. (PMID: 25843180)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013 Sep;29(3):284-8. (PMID: 24199504)
Environ Health Perspect. 1976 Apr;14:1-13. (PMID: 789056)
Acta Trop. 2014 Jul;135:96-103. (PMID: 24713197)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Sep;25(3):338-46. (PMID: 19852225)
J Med Entomol. 2014 Mar;51(2):444-9. (PMID: 24724295)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Jun;25(2):184-93. (PMID: 19653501)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2012 Sep;28(3):219-24. (PMID: 23833902)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2010 Sep;26(3):346-8. (PMID: 21033067)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991 Mar;7(1):116-7. (PMID: 1675251)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Jun;25(2):179-83. (PMID: 19653500)
Med Vet Entomol. 1993 Oct;7(4):363-8. (PMID: 8268492)
J Med Entomol. 2007 May;44(3):470-7. (PMID: 17547233)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2018 Dec;34(4):281-290. (PMID: 31442145)
J Med Entomol. 2017 Nov 7;54(6):1659-1665. (PMID: 28968745)
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 May;72(5):1004-12. (PMID: 26174607)
J Med Entomol. 2012 Sep;49(5):1021-6. (PMID: 23025182)
J Med Entomol. 2009 Mar;46(2):292-306. (PMID: 19351080)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008 Mar;24(1):172-6. (PMID: 18437835)
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 06;10(8):e0134831. (PMID: 26248028)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Dec;22(4):725-31. (PMID: 17304943)
J Med Entomol. 2018 Feb 28;55(2):472-476. (PMID: 29244157)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Sep;25(3):323-31. (PMID: 19852223)
J Econ Entomol. 1947 Feb;40(1):119-23. (PMID: 20240407)
Mosq News. 1946 Mar;6:7-11. (PMID: 21023401)
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008 Dec;24(4):543-9. (PMID: 19181063)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Aedes; Anopheles; Culex; DDT; barrier application; bifenthrin; mosquito; permethrin; pyrethroid
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20190703 Latest Revision: 20231012
رمز التحديث: 20231012
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6595667
DOI: 10.1177/1178630219859004
PMID: 31263373
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1178-6302
DOI:10.1177/1178630219859004