When's a story a story? Determining interpretability of Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global ratings on Thematic Apperception Test narratives.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	When's a story a story? Determining interpretability of Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global ratings on Thematic Apperception Test narratives.
المؤلفون:	Stein MB; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Calderon S; Mental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA., Ruchensky J; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Massey C; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Slavin-Mulford J; Department of Psychology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA., Chung WJ; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Richardson LA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Blais MA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
المصدر:	Clinical psychology & psychotherapy [Clin Psychol Psychother] 2020 Jul; Vol. 27 (4), pp. 567-580. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 22.
نوع المنشور:	Journal Article
اللغة:	English
بيانات الدورية:	Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9416196 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1099-0879 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10633995 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Psychol Psychother Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة:	Original Publication: Chichester, West Sussex, England : John Wiley & Sons, c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH:	Narration* , Object Attachment* , Social Cognition* , Thematic Apperception Test*, Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Male ; Psychopathology ; Reproducibility of Results
مستخلص:	The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Rating Method (SCORS-G) measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. The reliability and validity of this measure have been well established. However, a psychometric oddity of this scale is that default ratings are given to select dimensions when the relevant construct is not present. This can result in narrative 'blandness' and may impact clinical findings. The aim of these two studies is to understand these phenomena both psychometrically and clinically. In the first study, we identified 276 outpatients who had SCORS-G ratings for TAT Cards 1, 2, 3BM, and 14, set criteria for narrative 'blandness' across all eight dimensions, and examined group differences. In Study 2, we used a subset (N = 99) of Study 1 and examined how percentage of formal default ratings for Emotional Investment in Values and Moral Standards (EIM), Experience and Management of Aggressive Impulses (AGG), Self-Esteem(SE), and Identify and Coherence of Self (ICS) impacted robustness of correlations across tests of intelligence, psychopathology, and normal personality functioning. Taken together, we identified clinical characteristics of patients who are more likely to produce 'bland' narratives and increased percentages of formal default ratings. Also, an excess of default ratings per protocol impacts robustness of correlations and weakens significant correlations. As cut-off scores increase (>25% and >28.12%), the likelihood of being able to interpret EIM, AGG, SE, and ICS decreases. Psychometric and clinical implications are discussed. (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
References:	American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 36-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Costa, P. T.Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Costa, P. T.Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Multiple uses for longitudinal personality data. European Journal of Personality, 6, 85-102. Costa, P. T.Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). NEO PI-R professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Dana, R. H. (2008). Manual for Objective TAT scoring. In S. R. Jenkins(Ed.), A handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperception techniques (pp. 127-147). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DeFife, J. A., Goldberg, M., & Westen, D. (2013). Dimensional assessment of self and interpersonal functioning in adolescents: Implications for DSM-5's general definition of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 1-13. Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Volume 1: Basic foundations and principles for interpretation (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley. Furr, R. M. (2010). The double-entry intraclass correlation as an index of profile similarity: Meaning, limitations, and alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903379134. Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M., & Pinsker, J. (2007). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G, 2nd ed.). Unpublished manuscript, The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Garden City, NY: Adelphi University. Hopwood, C. J., & Moser, J. S. (2011). Personality Assessment Inventory internalizing and externalizing structure in college students: Invariance across sex and ethnicity. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 116-119. Jenkins, S. R. (2008). A handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperception techniques. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Karon, B. P. (2008). Pathogenesis index. In S. R. Jenkins(Ed.), A handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperception techniques (pp. 347-384). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding transference: The core conflictual relationship theme method (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Organization. Malone, J. C., Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Bello, I., Sinclair, S. J., & Blais, M. A. (2013). Seeing red: Affect modulation and chromatic color responses on the Rorschach. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 77(1), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2013.77.1.70. Morey, L. (1991). Personality assessment inventory professional manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources. Morey, L. (1996). An interpretative guide to the personality assessment inventory (PAI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Murray, H. A. (1943). Manual for the thematic apperception test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Perkey, H., Sinclair, S. J., Blais, M. A., Stein, M. B., Neal, P., Pierson, A. D. & Slavin-Mulford, J. (2017). External Validity of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) in a Clinical Sample. Psychiatry Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.011. Ritzler, B. (2008). The picture projection test. In S. R. Jenkins(Ed.), A handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperception techniques (pp. 229-257). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ronan, G. F., Gibbs, M. S., Dreer, L. E., & Lombardo, J. A. (2008). Personal problem-solvingsystem-revised. In S. R. Jenkins(Ed.), A handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperception techniques (pp. 181-207). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics. Berne, Switzerland: Hans. (Original work published 1921). Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. Stein, M. B., & Slavin-Mulford, J. (2018). The social cognition and object relations scale-global rating method (SCORS-G): A comprehensive guide for clinicians and researchers. New York, NY: Routledge. Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S. J., Chung, W. J., Roche, M., Denckla, C., & Blais, M. A. (2016). Extending the use of the SCORS-G composite rating in assessing level of personality organization. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1195394. Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., & Blais, M. A. (2012). Exploring the construct validity of the social cognition and object relations scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 533-540. Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence-second edition (WASI-II). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson. Westen, D. (1995). Social cognition and object relations scale: Q-sort for projective stories (SCORS-Q). Department of Psychiatry, The Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA: Unpublished manuscript. Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. I. (2001a). The psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaire: Development, reliability and validity. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2001.23126. Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. I. (2001b). A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses: The psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaire. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 787-794. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.8.787.
فهرسة مساهمة:	Keywords: SCORS-G; TAT; default ratings; object relations; performance-based tasks; social cognition
تواريخ الأحداث:	Date Created: 20200306 Date Completed: 20211022 Latest Revision: 20211022
رمز التحديث:	20231215
DOI:	10.1002/cpp.2442
PMID:	32133708
قاعدة البيانات:	MEDLINE

View record at Wiley

Full Text Finder

الوصف
تدمد:	1099-0879
DOI:	10.1002/cpp.2442