دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.
المؤلفون: Ozubko JD; SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY, USA., Sirianni LA; California State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA.; Behavioral Health and Performance Laboratory, Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, Human Health and Performance Directorate, KBR/NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA., Ahmad FN; Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada., MacLeod CM; University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada., Addante RJ; California State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA. Raddante@fit.edu.; Department of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W. University Blvd., Melbourne, FL, 32901, USA. Raddante@fit.edu.
المصدر: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience [Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci] 2021 Feb; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 119-143. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 06.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101083946 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-135X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15307026 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2011- : New York : Springer
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, c2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Mental Recall* , Semantics*, Cues ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials ; Humans ; Recognition, Psychology
مستخلص: When people can successfully recall a studied word, they should be able to recognize it as having been studied. In cued-recall paradigms, however, participants sometimes correctly recall words in the presence of strong semantic cues but then fail to recognize those words as actually having been studied. Although the conditions necessary to produce this unusual effect are known, the underlying neural correlates have not been investigated. Across five experiments, involving both behavioral and electrophysiological methods (EEG), we investigated the cognitive and neural processes that underlie recognition failures. Experiments 1 and 2 showed behaviorally that assuming that recalled items can be recognized in cued-recall paradigms is a flawed assumption, because recognition failures occur in the presence of cues, regardless of whether those failures are measured. With event-related potentials (ERPs), Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that successfully recalled words that are recognized are driven by recollection at recall and then by a combination of recollection and familiarity at ensuing recognition. In contrast, recognition failures did not show that memory signature and may instead be driven by semantic priming at recall and followed at recognition stages by negative-going ERP effects consistent with implicit processes, such as repetition fluency. These results demonstrate that recall - long-characterized as predominantly reflecting recollection-based processing in episodic memory - may at times also be served by a confluence of implicit cognitive processes.
التعليقات: Erratum in: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb 16;:. (PMID: 33594646)
References: Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):148-57. (PMID: 16686114)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 May;16(3):404-16. (PMID: 2140400)
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Mar 02;7(3):a021667. (PMID: 25731765)
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):261-7. (PMID: 16752590)
J Mem Lang. 2013 May 1;68(4):333-349. (PMID: 23637470)
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990 Jan;12(1):155-78. (PMID: 2406281)
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):95-116. (PMID: 23972087)
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3224-37. (PMID: 21827776)
Int J Psychophysiol. 2002 Sep;45(3):197-210. (PMID: 12208527)
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Jun;14(2):327-50. (PMID: 15950886)
Mem Cognit. 1977 Sep;5(5):513-22. (PMID: 24203218)
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:87-115. (PMID: 9496622)
Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):193-207. (PMID: 24171735)
Science. 1991 Sep 20;253(5026):1380-6. (PMID: 1896849)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):251-7. (PMID: 17481940)
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jul 27;680:69-76. (PMID: 29704572)
Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):389-402. (PMID: 21264598)
Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):549-62. (PMID: 1453972)
Brain Res. 2016 Mar 15;1635:41-60. (PMID: 26776478)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jun;16(6):313-5; discussion 315-6. (PMID: 22578306)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Feb;3(2):153-60. (PMID: 11836523)
Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):595-8. (PMID: 9560154)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 29;356(1413):1363-74. (PMID: 11571028)
Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59. (PMID: 7584893)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;57:179-90. (PMID: 24675676)
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9793-800. (PMID: 20660262)
J Exp Psychol. 1968 Aug;77(4):593-601. (PMID: 5672271)
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3240-9. (PMID: 23063967)
Hippocampus. 2010 Nov;20(11):1178-94. (PMID: 20848606)
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:60-71. (PMID: 28377210)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 12;6:80. (PMID: 22518102)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Jan;112(1):43-69. (PMID: 12423899)
Brain Res. 2006 Jul 19;1100(1):125-35. (PMID: 16774746)
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jul;145:96-111. (PMID: 31034858)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5973-8. (PMID: 9159185)
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):489-91. (PMID: 16501566)
J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 8;26(6):1669-72. (PMID: 16467513)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 14;8:213. (PMID: 24782741)
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):615-26. (PMID: 16099370)
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Dec 1;124(6):1914-1922. (PMID: 33052729)
Microsc Res Tech. 2000 Oct 1;51(1):6-28. (PMID: 11002349)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1341-54. (PMID: 7983467)
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1334-42. (PMID: 22850570)
Science. 1980 Oct 10;210(4466):207-10. (PMID: 7414331)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):231-52. (PMID: 9621832)
Memory. 1993 Sep;1(3):219-29. (PMID: 7584269)
Biol Psychol. 2006 Jun;72(3):325-32. (PMID: 16442202)
Hippocampus. 1998;8(3):198-204. (PMID: 9662134)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1089-103. (PMID: 17583986)
Neuroimage. 1998 Oct;8(3):262-73. (PMID: 9758740)
J Neurochem. 2006 Jun;97(6):1520-33. (PMID: 16805766)
Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1178-88. (PMID: 22700340)
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):18-23. (PMID: 9835388)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;11:125. (PMID: 28400723)
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Oct 14;369(2):150-5. (PMID: 15450686)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Jul;18(4):691-702. (PMID: 1385610)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Sep;4(3):393-400; discussion 401-406. (PMID: 15535174)
Neuroimage. 2007 Jun;36(2):488-9. (PMID: 17481924)
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Nov;50(13):3004-14. (PMID: 22898646)
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. (PMID: 25450109)
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3162-73. (PMID: 19651150)
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):2026-42. (PMID: 23806840)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):256-272. (PMID: 30517833)
Neuroreport. 1998 Oct 26;9(15):3463-6. (PMID: 9855299)
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):439-50. (PMID: 22548808)
Science. 1990 Jan 19;247(4940):301-6. (PMID: 2296719)
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999 Mar;5(3):175-90. (PMID: 10217918)
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 1;109:515-28. (PMID: 25562828)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):384-413. (PMID: 11294440)
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):923-38. (PMID: 11105518)
Brain Cogn. 2010 Dec;74(3):312-23. (PMID: 20875697)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep;11(9):379-86. (PMID: 17707683)
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3-6. (PMID: 10590970)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13445-52. (PMID: 8942955)
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Oct;34(10):515-25. (PMID: 21788086)
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct;37(4):292-9. (PMID: 17073167)
Hippocampus. 2010 Jan;20(1):24-8. (PMID: 19499585)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):97-111. (PMID: 18194057)
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1251-1258. (PMID: 28434860)
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2004 Nov;82(3):171-7. (PMID: 15464402)
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113. (PMID: 5146491)
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Jan;53(2):460-484. (PMID: 32761954)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):427-36. (PMID: 22795560)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002 Mar;2(1):1-18. (PMID: 12452581)
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Nov;4(4):251-62. (PMID: 8957566)
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Sep;146:107527. (PMID: 32540265)
Neuroreport. 2009 Jan 7;20(1):75-9. (PMID: 19033876)
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1236-41. (PMID: 12379865)
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:159-82. (PMID: 8460889)
Brain Res. 2010 Mar 12;1320:74-84. (PMID: 20051232)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10702-7. (PMID: 21670287)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov;22(11):2638-51. (PMID: 19702474)
Brain Res. 2010 Jun 4;1335:41-52. (PMID: 20346926)
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):707-711. (PMID: 27751531)
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 1;32(4):1879-90. (PMID: 16777433)
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. (PMID: 15641430)
Brain Res. 2010 Mar 4;1317:180-91. (PMID: 20051237)
Mem Cognit. 1988 Jul;16(4):309-13. (PMID: 3210971)
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:1-13. (PMID: 28558307)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1402-1414. (PMID: 28387586)
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Jan;7(1):63-78. (PMID: 11253843)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug;16(4):754-67. (PMID: 27106854)
Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):219-26. (PMID: 24171745)
Learn Mem. 2007 Apr 05;14(4):259-67. (PMID: 17412965)
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21. (PMID: 15102499)
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):490-517. (PMID: 8759045)
معلومات مُعتمدة: L30 NS112849 United States NS NINDS NIH HHS
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Cued recall; Event-related potentials; Familiarity; Priming; Recollection
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20210107 Date Completed: 20211025 Latest Revision: 20231111
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC7994187
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00854-w
PMID: 33409957
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
كن أول من يترك تعليقا!
يجب تسجيل دخولك أولا