دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Individualizing the decision-making process using data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry: 2018 OREF award paper.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Individualizing the decision-making process using data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry: 2018 OREF award paper.
المؤلفون: Maletis GB; Department of Orthopedics, Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park, California, USA., Funahashi TT; Department of Orthopedics, Kaiser Permanente Sand Canyon, Irvine, California, USA., Inacio MCS; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia., Paxton LW; Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.
المصدر: Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society [J Orthop Res] 2022 Jan; Vol. 40 (1), pp. 29-42. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 26.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8404726 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1554-527X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07360266 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Orthop Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2006- : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley
Original Publication: New York, N.Y. : Raven Press, [c1983-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries*/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction*/methods , Awards and Prizes*, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Reoperation ; Transplantation, Autologous
مستخلص: Despite years of study, controversy remains regarding the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), suggesting that a single graft type is not ideal for all patients. A large community based ACLR Registry that collects prospective data is a powerful tool that captures information and can be analyzed to optimize surgery for individual patients. The studies highlighted in this paper were designed to optimize and individualize ACLR surgery and have led to changes in surgeon behavior and improvements in patient outcomes. Kaiser Permanente (KP) is an integrated health care system with 10.6 million members and more than 50 hospitals. Every KP member who undergoes an ACLR is entered into the Registry, and prospectively monitored. The Registry uses a variety of feedback mechanisms to disseminate Registry findings to the ACLRR surgeons and appropriately influence clinical practices and enhance quality of care. Allografts were found to have a 3.0 times higher risk of revision than bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. Allograft irradiation >1.8 Mrad, chemical graft processing, younger patients, BPTB allograft, and male patients were all associated with a higher risk of revision surgery. By providing feedback to surgeons, overall allograft use has decreased by 27% and allograft use in high-risk patients ≤21 years of age decreased 68%. We have identified factors that influence the outcomes of ACLR. Statement of Clinical Significance: We found that information derived from an ACLR Registry and shared with the participating surgeons directly decreased the use of specific procedures and implants associated with poor outcomes.
(© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Sanders TL , Maradit Kremers H , Bryan AJ , et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1502-1507.
Daniel DM , Stone ML , Dobson BE , Fithian DC , Rossman DJ , Kaufman KR . Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:632-644.
Buller LT , Best MJ , Baraga MG , Kaplan LD . Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;23(1):2325967114563664.
Csintalan RP , Inacio MC , Funahashi TT . Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J. 2008;12(3):17-21.
Meuffels DE , Favejee MM , Vissers MM , Heijboer MP , Reijman M , Verhaar JAN . Ten year follow-up study comparing conservative versus operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched-pair analysis of high level athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):347-351.
Ardern CL , Taylor NF , Feller JA , Webster KE . Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543-1552.
McCullough KA , Phelps KD , Spindler KP , et al. Return to high school-and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2523-2529.
Clancy WC . Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Clin North Am. 1985;16:181-190.
Hospodar MS , Miller MD . Controversies in ACL reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009;17(4):242-246.
Kartus J , Movin T , Karlsson J . Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(9):971-980.
Gifstad T , Foss OA , Engebretsen L , et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2319-2328.
Tashiro T , Kurosawa H , Kawakami A , Hikita A , Fukui N . Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a detailed evaluation with comparison of single-and double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:522-529.
Mohtadi NG , Chan DS , Dainty KN , Whelan DB . Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD005960.
Maletis GB , Inacio MC , Desmond JL , Funahashi TT . Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:623-628.
Maletis GB , Inacio MC , Funahashi TT . Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2090-2098.
Jost PW , Dy CJ , Robertson CM , Kelly AM . Allograft use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HSS J. 2011;7(3):251-256.
Barber FA , Aziz-Jacobo J , Oro FB . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft: an age-dependent outcome evaluation. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):488-493.
Lamblin CJ , Waterman BR , Lubowitz JH . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1113-1122.
Mascarenhas R , Tranovich M , Karpie JC , Irrgang JJ , Fu FH , Harner CD . Patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the high-demand patient: evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9 Suppl):S58-S66.
Peterson RK , Shelton WR , Bomboy AL . Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2010;17(1):9-13.
Poehling GG , Curl WW , Lee CA , et al. Analysis of outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament repair with 5-year follow-up: allograft versus autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):774-785.
Barrett GR , Luber K , Replogle WH , Manley JL . Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: Tegner activity level and failure rate. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(12):1593-1601.
Borchers JR , Pedroza A , Kaeding C . Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2362-2367.
Ellis HB , Matheny LM , Briggs KK , Pennock AT , Steadman JR . Outcomes and revision rate after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years or younger with closed physes. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(12):1819-1825.
Engelman GH , Carry PM , Hitt KG , Polousky JD , Vidal AF . Comparison of allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft survival in an active adolescent cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2311-2318.
Pallis M , Svoboda SJ , Cameron KL , Owens BD . Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(6):1242-1246.
Sun K , Tian S , Zhang J , Xia C , Zhang C , Yu T . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(5):464-474.
Kraeutler MJ , Bravman JT , McCarty EC . Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(10):2439-2448.
Krych AJ , Jackson JD , Hoskin TL , Dahm DL . A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(3):292-298.
Prodromos C , Joyce B , Shi K . A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(7):851-856.
Tibor LM , Long JL , Schilling PL , Lilly RJ , Carpenter JE , Miller BS . Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of autograft versus allograft tissue. Sports Health. 2010;2(1):56-72.
Yao L-W , Wang Q , Zhang L , et al. Patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(2):355-365.
Carey JL , Dunn WR , Dahm DL , Zeger SL , Spindler KP . A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2242-2250.
Cvetanovich GL , Mascarenhas R , Saccomanno MF , et al. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014;12:1616-1624.
Foster TE , Wolfe BL , Ryan S , Silvestri L , Krall Kaye E . Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction results: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):189-199.
Mariscalco MW , Magnussen RA , Mehta D , Hewett TE , Flanigan DC , Kaeding CC . Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):492-499.
Mascarenhas R , Erickson BJ , Sayegh ET , et al. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(2):364-372.
Kaeding CC , Aros B , Pedroza A , et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health. 2011;3(1):73-81.
Wasserstein D , Khoshbin A , Dwyer T , et al. Risk factors for recurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population study in Ontario, Canada, with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2099-2107.
Malchau H , Herberts P , Eisler T , Garellick G , Söderman P . The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A(Suppl 2):2-20.
Graves SE . The value of arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthopedica. 2010;81:8-9.
Navarro RA , Inacio MC , Maletis GB . Does racial variation influence preoperative characteristics and intraoperative findings in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2959-2965.
Inacio MCS , Paxton EW , Maletis GB , et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:339-345.
Chhadia AM , Inacio MCS , Maletis GB , Csintalan RP , Davis BR , Funahashi TT . Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Spots Med. 2011;39(9):1894-1899.
Maletis GB , Inacio MCS , Reynolds S , Desmond JL , Maletis MM , Funahashi TT . Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections graft choice makes a difference. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(8):1780-1785.
Maletis GB , Chen J , Inacio MC , Funahashi TT . Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):331-336.
Tejwani SG , Chen J , Funahashi TT , Love R , Maletis GB . Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2696-2705.
Maletis GB , Chen J , Inacio MCS , Love RM , Funahashi TT . Increased risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft compared to autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(6):1333-1340.
Maletis GB , Chen J , Inacio MC , et al. Increased risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft tissue allograft compared to autograft: graft processing and time make a difference. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(8):1837-1844.
Maletis GB , Inacio MC , Funahashi TT . Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:641-646.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: ACL; anterior cruciate ligament; knee ligament; reconstruction; registry
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20210322 Date Completed: 20220418 Latest Revision: 20220418
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1002/jor.25020
PMID: 33751638
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.25020