دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Individual distinctiveness across call types of the southern white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum simum ).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Individual distinctiveness across call types of the southern white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum simum ).
المؤلفون: Linn SN; Frankfurt Zoo, Bernhard-Grzimek-Allee 1, Frankfurt am Main, Germany., Schmidt S; Institute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany., Scheumann M; Institute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany.
المصدر: Journal of mammalogy [J Mammal] 2021 Mar 20; Vol. 102 (2), pp. 440-456. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 20 (Print Publication: 2021).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 2985081R Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0022-2372 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00222372 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Mammal Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2015- : Oxford Oxford University Press
Original Publication: Lawrence, Kan. [etc.] American Society of Mammalogists.
مستخلص: Individual distinctiveness in the acoustic structure of vocalizations provides a basis for individual recognition in mammals and plays an important role in social behavior. Within a species, call types can differ in individual distinctiveness, which can be explained by three factors, namely differences in the social function, the distance of the caller to the receiver, and the acoustic structure of the call. We explored the variation in individual distinctiveness across three call types (Grunt, Hiss, Snort) of the southern white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum simum ) and investigated to what extent the abovementioned factors account for individual distinctiveness. Calls were recorded from 25 adult southern white rhinoceroses in six different zoos. We used three methods to compare the level of individual distinctiveness across call types, namely discriminant function analysis (DFA), potential for individual identity coding (PIC), and the information criterion (H s ). The three call types possessed an acoustic structure capable of showing individual variation to different extents. Individual distinctiveness was lowest for Snorts, intermediate for Hisses, and highest for Grunts. The level of individual distinctiveness of all three call types was lower than that previously reported for Pant calls of this species. Calls functioning to mediate intragroup social interactions had the highest individual distinctiveness. This highlights that a given communicative function and the need for individual discrimination during a social interaction have a major influence on the degree of individual distinctiveness.
(© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Mammalogists.)
References: J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688. (PMID: 29692469)
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Nov 5;203(2):223-31. (PMID: 19445967)
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e101940. (PMID: 25029238)
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):45-56. (PMID: 21875177)
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2315-24. (PMID: 11703871)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):2278-88. (PMID: 21476683)
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Aug;102(2 Pt 1):1213-22. (PMID: 9265764)
Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Nov;97(11):1023-7. (PMID: 20848074)
Front Zool. 2012 Dec 21;9(1):36. (PMID: 23259698)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2768-78. (PMID: 19894852)
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 05;9(6):e98475. (PMID: 24901244)
Am Nat. 2006 Sep;168(3):412-20. (PMID: 16947115)
Dev Psychobiol. 2007 Nov;49(7):708-18. (PMID: 17943980)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 May;129(5):3341-52. (PMID: 21568434)
J Exp Biol. 2011 Oct 15;214(Pt 20):3414-22. (PMID: 21957105)
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 15;10(1):15104. (PMID: 32934303)
Am J Primatol. 1995;37(3):191-219. (PMID: 31936952)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1792-805. (PMID: 19275336)
Behav Processes. 2016 Aug;129:94-100. (PMID: 27343622)
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan;103(1):602-14. (PMID: 9440345)
BMC Ecol. 2012 Nov 30;12:26. (PMID: 23198727)
Anim Cogn. 2016 Mar;19(2):375-86. (PMID: 26577089)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Mar;8(3):129-35. (PMID: 15301753)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Sep;120(3):1695-705. (PMID: 17004490)
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 08;6:27585. (PMID: 27273586)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):598-608. (PMID: 18647002)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3412-22. (PMID: 14714820)
Evol Appl. 2019 Dec 16;13(4):699-714. (PMID: 32211061)
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23015. (PMID: 21829682)
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Aug 12;2(8):150228. (PMID: 26361553)
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
J Zool (1987). 2013 Sep 1;291(1):. (PMID: 24363497)
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48907. (PMID: 23155427)
Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67. (PMID: 4597405)
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 09;4:390. (PMID: 23847565)
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0192166. (PMID: 29513670)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: acoustic structure hypothesis; bioacoustics; distance communication hypothesis; information criterion; mammal; nasal call; oral call; sender identity; social function hypothesis
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20210614 Latest Revision: 20210615
رمز التحديث: 20240829
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8189687
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyab007
PMID: 34121952
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:0022-2372
DOI:10.1093/jmammal/gyab007