دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain with Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis of the Sacroiliac Joint: (INSITE, iFuse, Tricor, Rialto, and others).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain with Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis of the Sacroiliac Joint: (INSITE, iFuse, Tricor, Rialto, and others).
المؤلفون: Kaye AD; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA. alan.kaye@lsuhs.edu.; Department of Academic Affairs, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. alan.kaye@lsuhs.edu., Edinoff AN; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Scoon L; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA., Youn S; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Farrell KJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA., Kaye AJ; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA., Shah RJ; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Cornett EM; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Chami AA; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Dixon BM; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Alvarado MA; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA., Viswanath O; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.; Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants-Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Urits I; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.; Southcoast Health, Southcoast Physicians Group Pain Medicine, Wareham, MA, USA., Calodney AK; Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.; Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA.
المصدر: Rheumatology and therapy [Rheumatol Ther] 2021 Sep; Vol. 8 (3), pp. 1061-1072. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 30.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Healthcare Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101674543 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2198-6576 (Print) Linking ISSN: 21986576 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Rheumatol Ther Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [London] : Springer Healthcare, [2014]-
مستخلص: Acute and chronic pain are public health issues that clinicians have been battling for years. Opioid medications have been a treatment option for both chronic and acute pain; however, they can cause unwanted complications and are a major contributor to our present opioid epidemic. The sacroiliac (SI) joint is a common cause of both acute and chronic low back pain. It affects about 15-25% of patients with axial low back pain, and up to 40% of patients with ongoing pain following lumbar fusion. Recent advances in the treatment of SI joint pain have led to the development of a wide variety of SI joint fusion devices. These fusion devices seek to stabilize the joints themselves in order that they become immobile and, in theory, can no longer be a source for pain. This is a minimally invasive procedure aimed to address chronic pain without subjecting patients to lengthy surgery or medications, including opioids with the potential for addiction and abuse. Minimally invasive SI fusion can be performed by a lateral approach (i.e., iFuse, Tricor) or posterior approach (i.e., CornerLoc, LinQ, Rialto). The posterior approach requires the patient to be in the prone position but allows for less disruption of muscles with entry. More data are necessary to determine which fusion system may be best for a particular patient. SI fusion devices are a promising way of treating chronic lower back pain related to the SI joint. This narrative review will discuss various types of SI fusion devices, and their potential use in terms of their safety and efficacy.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
References: Glare P, Aubrey KR, Myles PS. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1537–46. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30352-6)
Allegri M, Clark MR, De Andrés J, Jensen TS. Acute and chronic pain: where we are and where we have to go. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(2):222–35. (PMID: 22095106)
Cohen SP. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5):1440–53. (PMID: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180831.60169.EA)
DePhillipo NN, Corenman DS, Strauch EL, Zalepa King LA. Sacroiliac pain: structural causes of pain referring to the SI joint region. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(6):E282–8. (PMID: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000745)
Reveille JD, Arnett FC. Spondyloarthritis: update on pathogenesis and management. Am J Med. 2005;118(6):592–603. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.001)
Perrotta FM, Lories R, Lubrano E. To move or not to move: the paradoxical effect of physical exercise in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2021;7(1): e001480. (PMID: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001480)
Dydyk AM, Forro SD, Hanna A. Sacroiliac ioint injury. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557881/ . Accessed 29 Jun 2021.
INSITE Study Group, Polly DW, Cher DJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(5):674–91. (PMID: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988)
Adams PF, Kirzinger WK, Martinez M. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2012. Vital Health Stat 2013;10(259):1–95.
Saavoss J, Koenig L, Cher D. Productivity benefits of minimally invasive surgery in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Clin Outcomes Res. 2016;8:77–85.
Dengler J, Duhon B, Whang P, et al. Predictors of outcome in conservative and minimally invasive surgical management of pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: a pooled analysis. Spine. 2017;42(21):1664–73. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002169)
360 Market Updates. Global MIS sacroiliac joint fusion market. https://www.360marketupdates.com/global-mis-sacroiliac-joint-fusion-market-13716161 . Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Thoracolumbar Solutions. TriCor™ Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System —Surgical Technique Guide. p 32. https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/spine/tri-cor-sacroiliac-joint-fusion-system-surgical-technique-guide.pdf .
Laratta JL, Lin JD, Shillingford JN, Hardy NE, Reddy H, Lehman RA. Obstructed spinopelvic fixation in the setting of a triangular titanium sacroiliac fusion implant: a case description. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(4):732–5. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.11.11 . PMID: 29354757; PMCID: PMC5760409. (PMID: 10.21037/jss.2017.11.11293547575760409)
For Physicians [Internet]. CornerLoc. [cited 2021 Mar 28]. Available from: https://cornerloc.com/for-si-joint-physicians/.
Medtronic. SI joint fusion—sacroiliac joint fusion. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/patients/treatments-therapies/sacroiliac-joint-fusion/treatment-options/si-fusion.html . Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Medtronic. Important safety information—Rialto SI Fusion System. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/patients/treatments-therapies/sacroiliac-joint-fusion/important-safety-information.html . Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Suhy A. Prospective study announced for sacroiliac joint fusion device. This Week Orthopedics. 2020. https://ryortho.com/breaking/prospective-study-announced-for-sacroiliac-joint-fusion-device/ . Accessed 7 Mar 2021.
Kim D, Sayed D, Lamb C, Kim B, Oritz A, Pyles S. Initial experience with a minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion device, a retrospective case series. PainTEQ. 2020. https://painteq.com/doctors/news/2020/07/initial-experience-with-a-minimally-invasive-sacroiliac-fusion-device-a-retrospective-case-series/ . Accessed 7 Mar 2021.
Cohen M. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with Rialto SI Fusion System. Medtronic. 2016. https://www.globalcastmd.com/files/download/00e5f140a111066 .
Claus CF, Lytle E, Kaufmann A, et al. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium versus cylindrical threaded implants: a comparison of patient-reported outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e745–50. (PMID: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.150)
Rajpal S, Burneikiene S. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with cylindrical threaded implants using intraoperative stereotactic navigation. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1588–91. (PMID: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.116)
Polly DW, Cher DJ, Wine KD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: 12-month outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(5):674–90. (PMID: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988)
Dengler J, Sturesson B, Kools D, et al. Referred leg pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: 6-month outcomes from the prospective randomized controlled iMIA trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(11):2219–24. (PMID: 10.1007/s00701-016-2953-7)
SI-BONE. INSITE 2-year results (Polly–IJSS). 2016. https://si-bone.com/providers/clinical-evidence/data/two-year-outcomes-from-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-minimally-invasive . Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Duhon BS, Bitan F, Lockstadt H, Kovalsky D, Cher D, Hillen T. Triangular titanium implants for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: 2-year follow-up from a prospective multicenter trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852595/ . Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Lorio M, Kube R, Araghi A. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Policy 2020 update—minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion (for chronic sacroiliac joint pain): coverage indications, limitations, and medical necessity. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(6):860–95.
Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995;20(1):31–7. (PMID: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00007)
Depalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Saulloet T. What is the source of chronic low back pain and does age play a role? Pain Med. 2011;12(2):224–33.
Maigne JY, Planchon CA. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(7):654–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-004-0692-6)
DePalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Saullo TR. Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion. Pain Med. 2011;12(5):732–9. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01098.x)
Whang PG, Darr E, Meyer SC, et al. Long-term prospective clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants. Med Devices (Auckl). 2019;12:411–22.
Casaroli G, Bassani T, Brayda-Bruno M, Luca A, Galbusera F. What do we know about the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint and of sacropelvic fixation? A literature review. Med Eng Phys. 2019;76:1–12.
Shih YC, Beaubien BP, Chen Q, Sembrano JN. Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication. Spine J. 2018;18(7):1241–9. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.016)
Miller LE, Reckling WC, Block JE. Analysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruption. Med Devices (Auckl): 2013;6:77–84.
Cher D, Reckling W, Capobianco R. Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®. Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:485–92.
Dale M, Evans J, Carter K, O’Connell S, Morgan H, Carolan-Rees G. iFuse implant system for treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;18(3):363–73. (PMID: 10.1007/s40258-019-00539-7)
Scheyerer M, Hüllner M, Pietsch C, Veit-Haibach P, Werner C. Implant–bone interface of aacroiliac joint fusion using iFuse Implant System. ISRN Minimally Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:1–6. (PMID: 10.1155/2014/571014)
Bornemann R, Roessler P, Strauss A, et al. Two-year clinical results of patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome treated by arthrodesis using a triangular implant system. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(2):319–25. (PMID: 10.3233/THC-161272)
Bornemann R, Pflugmacher R, Webler M, et al. Klinische Studie zur Prüfung des iFuse Implant Systems® bei Patienten mit Iliosakralgelenksyndrom: 1-Jahres-Ergebnisse [Clinical Trial to Test the iFuse Implant System® in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome: One Year Results]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2016;154(6):601–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110207 . (PMID: 10.1055/s-0042-11020727389387)
Clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical study on a novel minimally invasive posterior sacroiliac fusion device. 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04423120 . Accessed 6 Apr 2021.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: CornerLoc; Low back pain; Minimal invasive surgery; Rialto; SI Joint pain; Tricor; iFuse
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20210731 Latest Revision: 20211110
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8380604
DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00350-8
PMID: 34331270
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2198-6576
DOI:10.1007/s40744-021-00350-8