دورية أكاديمية

Cost-Utility Analysis of Wide-Field Imaging as an Auxiliary Technology for Retinopathy of Prematurity Care in Brazil.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost-Utility Analysis of Wide-Field Imaging as an Auxiliary Technology for Retinopathy of Prematurity Care in Brazil.
المؤلفون: Neves LM; Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Haefeli LM; Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Zin AA; Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Steffen RE; Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.; Departamento de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janerio, Brazil., Vasconcelos ZFM; Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pinto M; Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
المصدر: Frontiers in pediatrics [Front Pediatr] 2021 Dec 16; Vol. 9, pp. 757258. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 16 (Print Publication: 2021).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Frontiers Media SA Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101615492 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2296-2360 (Print) Linking ISSN: 22962360 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Pediatr Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Lausanne : Frontiers Media SA, [2013]-
مستخلص: Purpose: To evaluate the cost-utility of wide-field imaging (WFI) as a complementary technology for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening from the Brazilian Unified Health System's perspective. Introduction: ROP is one of the leading causes of avoidable childhood blindness worldwide, especially in middle-income countries. The current ROP screening involves indirect binocular ophthalmoscopy (IBO) by ROP expert ophthalmologists. However, there is still insufficient ROP screening coverage. An alternative screening strategy is the combination of WFI with IBO. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed using a deterministic decision-tree simulation model to estimate incremental cost-utility for ROP care. Two screening strategies were compared: (1) IBO and (2) combination of WFI of all eligible preterm infants and IBO for type 2 ROP or worse and for non-readable images. Eligible population included preterm infants <32 weeks of gestational age or birth weight equal to or <1,500 g. The temporal horizon was lifetime. Visual outcome data was converted to utility, and the health benefits were estimated on quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Incremental cost per QALY gained was calculated from the health system perspective. Costs were estimated considering equipment, maintenance, consumables, and staff. A micro-costing approach was used for WFI. Two technician nurses were trained for imaging execution and had their time evaluated. Two ROP expert ophthalmologists had their time evaluated for imaging reading. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: Combined screening strategy resulted in a cost-effective program considering 90% ROP screening coverage. Costs per examination: (1) screening with IBO: US dollar (US $) 34.36; (2) screening with combination: US $58.20; (3) laser treatment: US $642.09; (4) long-term follow-up: ranged from US $69.33 to 286.91, based on the infant's visual function. Incremental cost per QALY gained was US $1,746.99/QALY per infant screened with the combination strategy. One-way sensitivity analysis resulted in cost-effectiveness for all parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses yielded a 100% probability of combination being cost-effective in a willingness-to-pay threshold of US $1,800/QALY. Conclusion: The combined strategy for ROP screening was cost-effective. It enhances access for appropriate ROP care in middle-income countries and dminishes opportunity costs for ophthalmologists.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2021 Neves, Haefeli, Zin, Steffen, Vasconcelos and Pinto.)
References: Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):149-77. (PMID: 22137039)
Eye Brain. 2016 May 19;8:31-36. (PMID: 28539799)
J AAPOS. 2013 Feb;17(1):49-53. (PMID: 23352719)
J AAPOS. 2006 Apr;10(2):107-11. (PMID: 16678743)
J AAPOS. 2008 Jun;12(3):252-8. (PMID: 18289897)
J AAPOS. 2018 Apr;22(2):124-127. (PMID: 29535051)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):663-71. (PMID: 20385926)
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935. (PMID: 27987642)
Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):e238-54. (PMID: 25548330)
Semin Perinatol. 2019 Oct;43(6):367-374. (PMID: 31153621)
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:110-121. (PMID: 27130372)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;126(4):493-9. (PMID: 18413518)
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):953-961. (PMID: 28385303)
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):227-32. (PMID: 11285667)
Ophthalmology. 2000 Jan;107(1):25-8. (PMID: 10647714)
J Bras Pneumol. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):536-8. (PMID: 26785963)
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;90(10):1292-6. (PMID: 16613919)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(6):1005-9. (PMID: 25812674)
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;65(5):390-395. (PMID: 28573995)
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):201-13. (PMID: 15209180)
Can J Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;35(5):267-72. (PMID: 10959467)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:233-48; discussion 248-50. (PMID: 15747762)
J AAPOS. 2009 Apr;13(2):186-90. (PMID: 19393519)
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 18;14(4):560-566. (PMID: 33875948)
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 Sep-Oct;70(5):875-83. (PMID: 18157319)
Pediatr Res. 2013 Dec;74 Suppl 1:35-49. (PMID: 24366462)
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Jul;36(1):37-43. (PMID: 25211676)
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;93(5):e372-e376. (PMID: 25721891)
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4):e47. (PMID: 10506272)
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 May;20(5):611-8. (PMID: 27084814)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;123(3):311-8. (PMID: 15767472)
J AAPOS. 2012 Dec;16(6):501-7. (PMID: 23237744)
Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126(2):e410-7. (PMID: 20660549)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Brazil; costs and cost analysis; diagnosis; healthcare economics; neonatal screening; quality-adjusted life years (QALY); retinopathy of prematurity; telemedicine
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220103 Latest Revision: 20240820
رمز التحديث: 20240820
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8716796
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.757258
PMID: 34976892
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2296-2360
DOI:10.3389/fped.2021.757258