تقرير
أعرض في EDS

Observations on the use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in teleosts and elasmobranchs at a public aquarium, 728 cases, 2007-2020.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Observations on the use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in teleosts and elasmobranchs at a public aquarium, 728 cases, 2007-2020.
المؤلفون: McMurrer J; Animal Health Department, New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., McElhiney A; Animal Health Department, New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., McNally K; Animal Health Department, New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Innis CJ; Animal Health Department, New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
المصدر: Zoo biology [Zoo Biol] 2022 Nov; Vol. 41 (6), pp. 576-581. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 17.
نوع المنشور: Case Reports
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: A.R. Liss Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8807837 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1098-2361 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07333188 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Zoo Biol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: New York : A.R. Liss, 1982-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Animals, Zoo* , Fishes* , Animal Identification Systems*/economics , Animal Identification Systems*/instrumentation , Animal Identification Systems*/standards , Animal Identification Systems*/veterinary, Animals ; Retrospective Studies ; Animal Welfare/statistics & numerical data
مستخلص: Between 2007 and 2020 at New England Aquarium, Boston, MA, USA, we implanted passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags into 728 fish representing 105 teleost and elasmobranch species to identify animals as individuals. At the time of retrospective data analysis, mean longevity interval (median, range) after tag placement for animals that remained alive (n = 236) was 4.7 years (4.5, 0.3-13.8). Mean interval (median, range) between tag placement and death (n = 317) was 2.1 years (1.6, 0-11.2); and mean interval (median, range) between tag placement and transfer to other facilities (n = 175) was 2.5 years (3.1, 0.1-9.3). Possible adverse effects of tagging were extremely rare. Using the described methods, the equipment cost for every 10 PIT tag implantations was $2.83. PIT tag implantation in fishes is a safe and cost effective method to identify individuals, providing an opportunity to accumulate valuable data regarding individual longevity, welfare, basic demographics, and outcome of medical management. PIT tag implantation is recommended as a routine aspect of acquisition, quarantine, and medical management of fish under human care.
(© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Brännäs, E., Lundqvist, H., Prentice, E., Schmitz, M., Brännäs, K., & Wiklund, B. (1994). Use of the passive integrated transponder (PIT) in a fish identification and monitoring system for fish behavioral studies. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 123, 395-401.
D'Arcy, J., Kelly, S., McDermott, T., Hyland, J., Jackson, D., & Bolton-Warberg, M. (2020). Assessment of PIT tag retention, growth and post-tagging survival in juvenile lumpfish, Cyclopterus lumpus. Animal Biotelemetry, 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0190-6.
Dare, M. (2003). Mortality and long-term retention of passive integrated transponder tags by spring chinook salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23, 1015-1019. https://doi.org/10.1577/M02-106.
Feldheim, K. A., Gruber, S. H., de Marignac, J. R. C., & Ashley, M. V. (2002). Genetic tagging to determine passive integrated transponder tag loss in lemon sharks. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 1309-1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02474.x.
Gibbons, W., & Andrews, K. (2004). PIT tagging: Simple technology at its best. BioScience, 54, 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0447:PTSTAI]2.0.CO;2.
Grassmann, M., Slager, C. J., & Herbert, K. (2012). Animal care practices and observations of growth in captive-born pacific angel sharks, Squatina californica, at Aquarium of the Bay. Drum and Croaker, 43, 10-26.
Harmon, T., & Celt, M. (2012). The use of sequential coded wire tags™ in a public aquarium. Drum and Croaker, 43, 3-9.
Harvey, W. D., & Campbell, D. L. (1989). Retention of passive integrated transponder tags in largemouth bass brood fish. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 51, 164-166. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1989)051%3C0164:TNROPI%3E2.3.CO;2.
Innis, C. J., Finn, S., Kennedy, A., Burgess, E., Norton, T., Manire, C., & Harms, C. (2019). A summary of sea turtles released from rescue and rehabilitation programs in the United States, with observations on re-encounters. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 18, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1335.1.
Knaepkens, G., Maerten, E., Tudorache, C., De Boeck, G., & Eens, M. (2007). Evaluation of passive integrated transponder tags for marking the bullhead (Cottus gobio), a small benthic freshwater fish: Effects on survival, growth and swimming capacity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 16, 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00231.x.
Leber, K. M., & Blankenship, H. L. (2012). How advances in tagging technology improved progress in a new science: marine stock enhancement. In (Eds.) McKenzie, J., Parsons, B., Seitz, A. C., Kopf, R. K., Mesa, M. & Phelps, Q., Advances in Fish Tagging and Marking Technology (pp. 1-12). United States of America: American Fisheries Society.
Musselman, W. C., Worthington, T. A., Mouser, J., Williams, D. M., & Brewer, S. K. (2017). Passive integrated transponder tags: Review of studies on warmwater fishes with notes on additional species. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 8, 353-364. https://doi.org/10.3996/122016-JFWM-091.
National Research Council. (2011). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Eighth Edition.). National Academies Press.
Ombredane, D., Bagliniere, J. L., & Marchand, F. (1998). The effects of passive integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and their use for studying movement in a small river. Hydrobiologia, 371/372, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5090-3_12.
Parker, S. J., & Rankin, P. S. (2003). Tag location and retention in black rockfish: Feasibility of using PIT tags in a wild marine species. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23, 993-996. https://doi.org/10.1577/M02-111.
Peterson, N. P., Prentice, E. F., & Quinn, T. P. (1994). Comparison of sequential coded wire and passive integrated transponder tags for assessing overwinter growth and survival of juvenile coho salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 14, 870-873.
Smyth, B., & Nebel, S. (2013). Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags in the study of animal movement. Nature Education Knowledge, 4(3), 3.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: fish; husbandry; identification; marking; microchip; tagging; veterinary
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220117 Date Completed: 20221220 Latest Revision: 20221220
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21678
PMID: 35037285
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1098-2361
DOI:10.1002/zoo.21678