دورية أكاديمية

Effects of Rhododendron removal and prescribed fire on bees and plants in the southern Appalachians.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effects of Rhododendron removal and prescribed fire on bees and plants in the southern Appalachians.
المؤلفون: Ulyshen M; USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens Georgia USA., Elliott K; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Scott J; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Horn S; USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens Georgia USA., Clinton P; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Liu N; USDA Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA., Miniat CF; USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Albuquerque New Mexico USA., Caldwell P; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Oishi C; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Knoepp J; USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory Otto North Carolina USA., Bolstad P; Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USA.
المصدر: Ecology and evolution [Ecol Evol] 2022 Mar 01; Vol. 12 (3), pp. e8677. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 01 (Print Publication: 2022).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Pub. Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101566408 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2045-7758 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20457758 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ecol Evol Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [Oxford] : Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
مستخلص: Rhododendron maximum is an evergreen shrub native to the Appalachian Mountains of North America that has expanded in recent decades due to past disturbances and land management. The purpose of this study was to explore how bees and plants were affected by the experimental removal of R . maximum followed by a prescribed fire in one watershed compared to a neighboring reference watershed. Bees and plants were sampled for three years in both watersheds. Comparisons were based on the rarefaction and extrapolation sampling curves of Hill numbers as well as multivariate methods to assess effects on community composition. Bee richness, Shannon's diversity, and Simpson's diversity did not differ between watersheds in the year after removal but were all significantly higher in the removal watershed in year two, following the prescribed fire. Bee Shannon's diversity and Simpson's diversity, but not richness, remained significantly higher in the removal watershed in the third year. Similar but weaker patterns were observed for plants. Comparisons of community composition found significant differences for bees in the second and third year and significant differences for plants in all three years. For both groups, significant indicator taxa were mostly associated with the removal watershed. Because bees appeared to respond more strongly to the prescribed fire than to the removal of R . maximum and these benefits weakened considerably one year after the fire, clearing R . maximum does not appear to dramatically improve pollinator habitat in the southern Appalachians. This conclusion is underscored by the fact that about one quarter of the bee species in our study area were observed visiting R . maximum flowers. The creation of open areas with wildflowers may be a better way to benefit bees in this region judging from the high diversity of bees captured in the small roadside clearings in this study.
Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests.
(© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)
References: Ecol Appl. 2013 Jun;23(4):777-90. (PMID: 23865229)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 01;12(3):e8677. (PMID: 35261754)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Dec;94(6):1983-2010. (PMID: 31298472)
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):287-296. (PMID: 28976620)
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):213-23. (PMID: 17298527)
Environ Entomol. 2011 Jun;40(3):621-32. (PMID: 22251640)
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56678. (PMID: 23457602)
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 12;10(3):e0119733. (PMID: 25764085)
Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1678-92. (PMID: 20945767)
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528. (PMID: 30016406)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Apoidea; conservation; forest management; pollinators; restoration
سلسلة جزيئية: Dryad 10.5061/dryad.4xgxd25bv
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220309 Latest Revision: 20220317
رمز التحديث: 20240829
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8888263
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8677
PMID: 35261754
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2045-7758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.8677