دورية أكاديمية
Components in tobacco-free school policies-A coding tool for assessment.
| العنوان: | Components in tobacco-free school policies-A coding tool for assessment. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Chadwick G; Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA., Dobbs PD; Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA., Gluesenkamp K; Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA., Vinzant D; Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA., Everett KD; Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. |
| المصدر: | Journal of American college health : J of ACH [J Am Coll Health] 2024 Oct; Vol. 72 (7), pp. 2075-2082. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 05. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8214119 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1940-3208 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07448481 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Coll Health Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2010- : New York : Routledge Original Publication: [Washington, D.C. : Published by the Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation, in cooperation with the American College Health Association, c1982- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Smoke-Free Policy*/legislation & jurisprudence, Humans ; Universities/organization & administration ; Universities/statistics & numerical data ; Students/statistics & numerical data ; Missouri ; Organizational Policy |
| مستخلص: | Objective: To develop an instrument to examine tobacco-free campus policy components. Participants: Missouri two- and four-year, specialized/technical, and religious colleges and universities ( N = 76). Methods: The instrument was informed via literature review and expert interviews. Coder agreement was strong (κ = .80). Qualitative policy language examples were identified. Results: Model policy components including consideration for population, prohibited products, location restrictions, enforcement, consequences, promotions, communications, cessation, designated smoking areas and exemptions; comprehensive policies included all populations, for all tobacco products, and at all locations on the campus. Nineteen campuses had comprehensive tobacco-free policies, five had comprehensive smoke-free policies (cigarettes and e-cigarettes), and no policy included all model components. Fifty-two were non-comprehensive. Conclusions: This instrument can allow campuses to identify components for comprehensive and model tobacco-free campus policies and assist officials in improving policy language. Future research can use this instrument to examine the effectiveness of components and their impact on tobacco use outcomes. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Campus; policy; smoke-free; tobacco; tobacco-free |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20220805 Date Completed: 20240903 Latest Revision: 20240903 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240904 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2022.2103374 |
| PMID: | 35930361 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
PDF full text from Publisher | تدمد: | 1940-3208 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2022.2103374 |