دورية أكاديمية
The respiratory effects of a Pilates method protocol: Randomized clinical trial.
| العنوان: | The respiratory effects of a Pilates method protocol: Randomized clinical trial. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Vieira KJV; Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil., Carvalho LC; Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil., Borges JBC; Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil., Reis CJD; Statistics Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil., Iunes DH; Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil. Electronic address: deniseiunes@unifal-mg.edu.br. |
| المصدر: | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies [J Bodyw Mov Ther] 2022 Oct; Vol. 32, pp. 149-155. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 25. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Churchill Livingstone Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9700068 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-9283 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13608592 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Bodyw Mov Ther Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: New York : Churchill Livingstone, c1996- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Breathing Exercises*/methods , Respiratory Muscles*/physiology, Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Maximal Respiratory Pressures ; Muscle Strength/physiology ; Single-Blind Method |
| مستخلص: | Objectives: To evaluate the respiratory effects of a Pilates method (PM) protocol in adult women. Design: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. Settings: Healthy women were randomized into two groups using the Random.org online tool: a Pilates group (PG) (n = 33) and a control group (CG) (n = 29). Participants: Sixty-two healthy women, aged 18-44 years, sedentary or irregularly active B (as defined by the international physical activity questionnaire [IPAQ]). The intervention consisted of 16 sessions of PM. protocol twice a week for the PG. The CG without intervention. Main Outcomes Measures: The variables evaluated were maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), peak expiratory flow (PEF), tidal volume (TV), respiratory frequency (RF), minute volume (MV), and slow vital capacity (SVC). Results: The results showed significant evidence of the beneficial respiratory effects of the PM protocol when the PG was compared with the CG: increased MIP (p = 0.001), and a significant increase in TV (p = 0,047). Conclusion: The PM protocol used in this study may be effective for respiratory muscle strength because it improved MIP and TV. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-5b6wc3. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest I declare that I have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Exercise and movement techniques; Rehabilitation; Respiratory function tests |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20220930 Date Completed: 20221004 Latest Revision: 20221013 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.04.014 |
| PMID: | 36180142 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text via ClinicalKey 
Full Text Finder كن أول من يترك تعليقا!