دورية أكاديمية
Mice make temporal inferences about novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies.
العنوان: | Mice make temporal inferences about novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Gür E; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Room 222, Winnipeg, R3T 2M5, Canada.; Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey., Duyan YA; Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.; Department of Psychology, MEF University, Istanbul, Turkey., Balcı F; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Room 222, Winnipeg, R3T 2M5, Canada. fuat.balci@umanitoba.ca.; Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey. fuat.balci@umanitoba.ca. |
المصدر: | Animal cognition [Anim Cogn] 2023 Jun; Vol. 26 (3), pp. 771-779. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 17. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9814573 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1435-9456 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14359448 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anim Cogn Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1998- |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Learning* , Reward*, Mice ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Mice, Inbred C57BL |
مستخلص: | Animals learn multiple spatiotemporal contingencies and organize their anticipatory responses accordingly. The representational/computational capacity that underlies such spatiotemporally guided behaviors is not fully understood. To this end, we investigated whether mice make temporal inferences of novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies. We trained 18 C57BL/6J mice to anticipate reward after three different intervals at three different locations and tested their temporal expectations of a reward at five locations simultaneously, including two locations that were not previously associated with reward delivery but adjacent to the previously trained locations. If mice made spatiotemporal inferences, they were expected to interpolate between duration pairs associated with previously reinforced hoppers surrounding the novel hopper. We found that the maximal response rate at the novel locations indeed fell between the two intervals reinforced at the surrounding hoppers. We argue that this pattern of responding might be underlain by spatially constrained Bayesian computations. (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
References: | Arifin WN, Zahiruddin WM (2017) Sample size calculation in animal studies using resource equation approach. Malays J Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.11. (PMID: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.11293869785772821) Balcı F, Gallistel CR (2006) Cross-domain transfer of quantitative discriminations: Is it all a matter of proportion? Psychon Bull Rev. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193974. (PMID: 10.3758/BF0319397417201363) Balcı F, Papachristos EB, Gallistel CR, Brunner D, Gibson J, Shumyatsky GP (2008) Interval timing in genetically modified mice: a simple paradigm. Genes Brain Behav. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00348.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00348.x17696995) Balcı F, Gallistel CR, Allen BD, Frank KM, Gibson JM, Brunner D (2009) Acquisition of peak responding: What is learned? Behav Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.01019379799) Buhusi CV, Aziz D, Winslow D, Carter RE, Swearingen JE, Buhusi MC (2009) Interval timing accuracy and scalar timing in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017106. (PMID: 10.1037/a0017106198247772822645) Buhusi M, Bartlett MJ, Buhusi C (2017) Sex differences in interval timing and attention to time in C57Bl/6J mice. Behav Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.023. (PMID: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.023286475945546905) Buhusi CV, Reyes MB, Gathers CA, Oprisan SA, Buhusi M (2018) Inactivation of the medial-prefrontal cortex impairs interval timing precision, but not timing accuracy or scalar timing in a peak-interval procedure in rats. Front Integr Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2018.00020. (PMID: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00020299885766026933) Cheng K, Spetch ML, Miceli P (1996) Averaging temporal duration and spatial position. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.22.2.175. (PMID: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.2.1758618102) Çoşkun F, Berkay D, Sayalı ZC, Balcı F (2015) Sequential temporal discrimination in humans and mice. Int J Comp Psychol. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2015.28.02.08. (PMID: 10.46867/ijcp.2015.28.02.08) De Corte BJ, Matell MS (2016) Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration. Curr Opin Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004271754404860806) De Corte BJ, Navarro VM, Wasserman EA (2017) Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons. Curr Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.029. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.02929207264) Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371. (PMID: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371) Drew MR, Zupan B, Cooke A, Couvillon PA, Balsam PD (2005) Temporal control of conditioned responding in goldfish. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.31. (PMID: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.3115656725) Gür E, Duyan YA, Balcı F (2018) Spontaneous integration of temporal information: implications for representational/computational capacity of animals. Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1137-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s10071-017-1137-z29027025) Gür E, Duyan YA, Balcı F (2021) Numerical averaging in mice. Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01444-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s10071-020-01444-633150473) Henik A, Tzelgov J (1982) Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Mem Cognit. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202431. (PMID: 10.3758/BF032024317132716) Jazayeri M, Shadlen MN (2010) Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2590. (PMID: 10.1038/nn.2590205818422916084) Karşılar H, Balcı F (2019) Symbolism overshadows the effect of physical size in supra-second temporal illusions. Atten Percept Psychophys. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01748-x. (PMID: 10.3758/s13414-019-01748-x31165452) Light KR, Cotten B, Malekan T, Dewil S, Bailey MR, Gallistel CR, Balsam PD (2019) Evidence for a mixed timing and counting strategy in mice performing a Mechner counting task. Front Behav Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00109. (PMID: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00109312933966603078) Malet-Karas A, Noulhiane M, Doyère V (2019) Dynamics of spatio-temporal binding in rats. Timing Time Percept. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-20181124. (PMID: 10.1163/22134468-20181124) Matell MS, Kurti AN (2014) Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes. Acta Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006) Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.320. (PMID: 10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.3206886634) Merritt DJ, Casasanto D, Brannon EM (2010) Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011208466452952654) O’Keefe J, Burgess N (1996) Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/381425a0. (PMID: 10.1038/381425a08632799) Petzschner FH, Glasauer S, Stephan KE (2015) A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation. Trends Cogn Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.00225843543) Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Priftis K, Regolin L (2015) Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science 347(6221):534–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379. (PMID: 10.1126/science.aaa137925635096) Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Priftis K, Regolin L (2020) Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54662. (PMID: 10.7554/eLife.54662325842577316507) Shi Z, Church RM, Meck WH (2013) Bayesian optimization of time perception. Trends Cogn Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.00924139486) Spence KW (1937) The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062885. (PMID: 10.1037/h0062885) Swanton DN, Matell MS (2011) Stimulus compounding in interval timing: The modality–duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020200. (PMID: 10.1037/a0020200207185463035771) Swanton DN, Gooch CM, Matell MS (2009) Averaging of temporal memories by rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014021. (PMID: 10.1037/a0014021195942882771418) Tosun T, Gür E, Balcı F (2016) Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518316113. (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.1518316113267336744725500) Walsh V (2003) A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.00214585444) Wu SW, Dal Martello MF, Maloney LT (2009) Sub-optimal allocation of time insequential movements. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008228. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008228200468782795856) |
معلومات مُعتمدة: | 117K370 Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu; BİDEB-2211E Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Bayesian averaging; Conditioning; Interval timing; Mice; Peak interval procedure |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20221117 Date Completed: 20230404 Latest Revision: 20230404 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10071-022-01715-4 |
PMID: | 36394657 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1435-9456 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1007/s10071-022-01715-4 |