دورية أكاديمية

Contextualizing eco-anxiety and eco-anger: tentative responses to visceral and numinous emotions.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Contextualizing eco-anxiety and eco-anger: tentative responses to visceral and numinous emotions.
المؤلفون: Rozuel C; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Bellehumeur CR; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
المصدر: The Journal of analytical psychology [J Anal Psychol] 2022 Nov; Vol. 67 (5), pp. 1431-1451.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0376573 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-5922 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00218774 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Anal Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2000->: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers
Original Publication: London.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Emotions*/physiology , Anxiety*/psychology, Humans ; Anger ; Anxiety Disorders
مستخلص: In this paper, we explore how the emotions of eco-anxiety and eco-anger can be perceived as potentially constructive responses to the climate crisis. We examine the context in which these emotions are experienced and expressed in light of the relationship between human beings and Nature. We argue that these eco-emotions are both visceral and numinous, and that this dual characteristic is critical when determining how best to respond to eco-anxiety and eco-anger. We propose that a suitable approach to this challenge is to draw from the imagination and the symbolic domain, and we offer personal reflections on what this process may look like.
(© 2022 The Society of Analytical Psychology.)
References: Albrecht, G. (2011). ‘Chronic environmental change: emerging “psychoterratic” syndromes’. In Climate Change and Human Well-Being: Global Challenges and Opportunities, ed. I. Weissbecker, (pp. 43-56). New York, NY: Springer.
Andrews, N. & Hoggett, P. (2019). ‘Facing up to ecological crisis: a psychosocial perspective from climate psychology’. In Facing Up to Climate Reality: Honesty, Disaster and Hope, ed. J. Foster, (pp.155-71). London: Green House/London Publishing Partnership.
Bellehumeur, C.R. & Sundaram, L. (2015). ‘“Spiritual but not religious”: some contemporary influences and their impact on health’. In Spirituality: Global Practices, Societal Attitudes and Effects on Health, ed. E.C. Roberts, (pp. 231-52). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Bold, R. (2020). ‘Constructing cosmoscapes’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 10, 195-208.
Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., Knight, T.M. & Pullin, A.S. (2010). ‘A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments’. BMC Public Health, 10, 1, 456.
Burelli, T., Lillo, A., Campbell-Duruflé, C. & Touchant, L. (2021). ‘We were at COP26: It had mixed results’. The Conversation, Nov. 30th. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/we-were-at-cop26-it-had-mixed-results-172558.
Cashford, J. (2021). ‘Imagining earth’. In Depth Psychology and Climate Change: The Green Book, ed. D. Mathers, (pp. 91-107). Abingdon & New York, NY: Routledge.
Classen, C. (ed.). (2005). The Book of Touch. London: Routledge.
Clayton, S., Manning, C.M., Krygsman, K. & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental Health and Our Changing Climate: Impacts, Implications, and Guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica.
Coffey, Y., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Islam M.S. & Usher, K. (2021). ‘Understanding eco-anxiety: A systematic scoping review of current literature and identified knowledge gaps’. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047.
Doherty, T.J. & Clayton, S. (2011). ‘The psychological impacts of global climate change’. American Psychologist, 66, 4, 265-76.
Dowd, A. (2019). ‘Uprooted minds: displacement, trauma and dissociation’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64, 2, 244-69.
Dowd, A. (2020). ‘Displacement trauma: complex states of personal, collective and intergenerational fragmentation and their intergenerational transmission’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 65, 2, 300-24.
Dumais, Z. (2021). ‘L’écoanxiété est un mal nécessaire’. 24heures, Sept. 30th. Available at: https://www.24heures.ca/2021/09/30/lecoanxiete-est-un-mal-necessaire.
Durand, G. (1999). Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary, trans. M. Sankey & J. Hatten. Brisbane: Boombana Publications.
Earth Guardians. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.earthguardians.org/.
Fellows, A. (2019). Gaia, Psyche and Deep Ecology: Navigating Climate Change in the Anthropocene. Abingdon & New York, NY: Routledge.
Feng, Z., Logan, S., Cupchik, G., Ritterfield, U. & Gaffin, D. (2017). ‘A cross-cultural exploration of imagination as a process-based concept’. Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research and Clinical Practice, 37, 1, 69-94.
Gifford, R. (2011). ‘The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation’. American Psychologist, 66, 290-302.
Gregory, A. (2021). ‘“Eco-anxiety”: fear of environmental doom weighs on young people’. The Guardian, October 6. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/oct/06/eco-anxiety-fear-of-environmental-doom-weighs-on-young-people.
Guindon, M., Packard, R. & Charron, N. (2017). ‘The ethics of touch in the helping relationships’. In Touch in the Helping Professions: Research, Practice and Ethics, eds. M. Rovers, J. Malette & M. Guirguis-Younger (pp. 213-36). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Harpur, P. (2003). Daimonic Reality. Ravensdale, WA: Pine Winds Press.
Hickman, C. (2020). ‘We need to (find a way to) talk about … eco-anxiety’. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34, 4, 411-24.
Jensen, S. (2015). ‘The nature of imagination in education for sustainability’. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 2, 289-92.
Judson, G. (2010). A New Approach to Imaginative Ecological Education: Engaging Students’ Imaginations in Their World. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Jung, C.G. (1931). ‘Americans must say “no”’. In C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, eds. W. McGuire & R. F. C. Hull (1977, pp. 47-9). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1938). ‘The relations between the ego and the unconscious’. CW 7.
Jung, C.G. (1957). ‘The undiscovered self’. CW 10.
Jung, C.G. (1968). ‘Religious ideas in alchemy’. CW 12.
Lewis, S.L. & Maslin, M.A. (2015). ‘Defining the anthropocene’. Nature, 519, 7542, 171-80.
Lutz, P.K., Passmore, H.-A. & Howell, A.J. (2021). ‘Eco-anxiety and the six existential anxieties’. Psynopsis, 43, 2, 12-3.
Mackay, S. (2021). ‘Compassionate reflections about eco-anxiety’. Psynopsis, 43, 2, 16-19.
Marks, E., Hickman, C., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, E.R., Mayall, E.E., Wray, B., Mellor, C. & van Susteren, L. (2021). ‘Young people’s voices on climate anxiety, government betrayal and moral injury: a global phenomenon’. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918955.
Mathers, D. (ed.). (2021). Depth Psychology and Climate Change: The Green Book. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
Miyazaki, Y. (2006). Science of Natural Therapy. Chiba: Chiba University Press.
Naess, A. (1973). ‘The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary’. Inquiry, 16, 1-4, 95-100.
Passmore, H.-A. & Howell, A.J. (2014). ‘Eco-existential positive psychology: experiences in nature, existential anxieties, and well-being’. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42, 370-88.
Pihkala, P. (2018). ‘Eco-anxiety, tragedy, and hope: psychological and spiritual dimensions of climate change’. Zygon, 53, 2, 545-69.
Pihkala, P. (2020). ‘Anxiety and the ecological crisis: an analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety’. Sustainability, 12, 7836, 1-20.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S. III, Lambin, E., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. (2009). ‘Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity’. Ecology and Society, 14, 2, 32.
Rozuel, C. (2012). ‘Moral imagination and active imagination: searching in the depths of the psyche’. Journal of Management Development, 31, 5, 488-501.
Rozuel, C. (2016). ‘Jung’s insights on ethics in business and work organisations: examining the “moral nature of present-day man”’. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 8, 3, 141-58.
Rozuel, C. (2019). ‘Unearthing gold from the mud: alchemy and organizational tensions’. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16, 2, 178-98.
Rust, M.-J. (2020). Towards an Ecopsychotherapy. London: Confer.
Sherman, N. (2020). ‘Moral injury and self-empathy: lessons from Sophocles’ Ajax’. In Moral Injury and Beyond: Understanding Human Anguish and Healing Traumatic Wounds, ed. R.K. Papadopoulos (pp. 22-36). Abingdon & New York, NY: Routledge.
Siegel, D.J. (2012). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sogge, K. (2021). ‘Clinical notes: revisioning the self in psychotherapy to support awakening in the ecological crisis’. Psynopsis, 43, 2, 14-5.
Stanley, S.K., Hogg, T.L., Leviston, Z. & Walker, I. (2021). ‘From anger to action: differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing’. The Journal of Climate Change and Health Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100003.
Sunstein, C.R. (2021, July 16). ‘Climate change cosmopolitanism’. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3886696 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3886696.
Swim, J.K., Stern, P.C., Doherty, T.J., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P., Weber, E.U., Gifford, R. & Howard, G.S. (2011). ‘Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change’. American Psychologist, 66, 4, 241-50.
Ulanov, A. & Ulanov, B. (2008). The Healing Imagination. Einsielden: Daimon Verlag.
Weintrobe, S. (2020). ‘Moral injury, the culture of uncare and the climate bubble’. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34, 4, 351-62.
Wen, Y., Yan, Q., Pan, Y., Gu, X. & Liu, Y. (2019). ‘Medical empirical research on forest bathing (Shinrin-yoku): A systematic review’. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0822-8.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Emotionen; Imagination; Klimakrise; Natur; Numinosität; Symbole; climate crisis; crise du climat; crisi climatica; crisis climática; emociones; emotions; emozioni; imaginación; imagination; immaginazione; natura; naturaleza; nature; numinosidad; numinosity; numinosità; numinosité; simboli; symboles; symbols; símbolos; émotions; воображение; климатический кризис; нуминозность; природа; символы; эмоции; 情绪; 想象; 气候危机; 神性; 自然; 象征
Local Abstract: [Publisher, French] Dans cet article les auteurs explorent comment les émotions d’éco-anxiété et d’éco-colère peuvent être perçues comme des réponses potentiellement constructives à la crise du climat. A la lumière de la relation entre les êtres humains et la nature ils étudient le contexte dans lequel ces émotions sont ressenties et exprimées et soutiennent que ces éco-émotions sont à la fois viscérales et numineuses. Les auteurs suggèrent que cette double caractéristique est cruciale quand il s’agit de déterminer comment répondre au mieux à l’éco-anxiété et l’éco-colère. Ils suggèrent que l’approche qui convient pour relever ce défi est de s’appuyer sur l’imagination et le domaine symbolique. Des réflexions personnelles sont données afin d’illustrer à quoi pourrait ressembler ce processus. [Publisher, German] In diesem Artikel untersuchen die Autoren, wie die Emotionen von Öko-Angst und Öko-Wut als potentiell konstruktive Reaktionen auf die Klimakrise wahrgenommen werden können. Sie untersuchen den Kontext, in dem diese Emotionen erlebt und ausgedrückt werden, im Lichte der Beziehung zwischen Mensch und Natur und argumentieren, daß diese Öko-Emotionen sowohl viszeral als auch numinos sind. Die Autoren schlagen vor, daß dieses duale Merkmal entscheidend ist wenn es darum geht zu bestimmen, wie man am besten auf Öko-Angst und Öko-Wut reagiert und sie regen an, einen geeigneten Ansatz für diese Herausforderung darin zu sehen, aus der Vorstellungskraft und dem symbolischen Bereich zu schöpfen. Es werden persönliche Reflexionen darüber angeboten, wie dieser Prozeß aussehen könnte. [Publisher, Italian] In questo articolo, gli Autori esplorano come le emozioni di eco-ansia ed eco-rabbia possono essere percepite come risposte potenzialmente costruttive alla crisi climatica. Esaminano il contesto in cui queste emozioni sono vissute ed espresse alla luce della relazione tra gli esseri umani e la natura e sostengono che queste ecoemozioni siano sia viscerali che numinose. Gli autori suggeriscono che questa duplice caratteristica è fondamentale nel determinare il modo migliore per rispondere all'eco-ansia e all'eco-rabbia e propongono che un approccio adeguato a questa sfida sia quello di attingere dall'immaginazione e dal dominio simbolico. Vengono offerte riflessioni personali su come potrebbe essere questo processo. [Publisher, Russian] Авторы статьи исследуют возможность воспринимать эмоции эко-тревоги и эко-опасности как потенциально конструктивные ответы на климатический кризис. Они рассматривают контекст, в котором данные эмоции переживаются и выражаются в свете отношений между человеком и природой, и утверждают, что эти эко-эмоции являются одновременно висцеральными и нуминозными. Авторы полагают, что эта двойственная характеристика имеет решающее значение при определении того, как лучше реагировать на эко-тревогу и эко-опасность, и призывают использовать воображение и сферу символического. Предлагаются личные размышления о том, что может представлять собой этот процесс. [Publisher, Spanish; Castilian] En el presente trabajo, los autores exploran como las emociones de eco-ansiedad y eco-enojo pueden percibirse como respuestas potencialmente constructivas a la crisis climática. Se examina el contexto en el cual estas emociones son experimentadas y expresadas a la luz de la relación entre seres humanos y naturaleza, y se argumenta que estas eco-emociones son tanto viscerales como numinosas. Los autores sugieren que esta característica dual es crítica al momento de determinar el mejor modo de responder a la eco-ansiedad y al eco-enojo, y proponen que un abordaje apropiado a este desafío se basa en la imaginación y en el domino simbólico. Se ofrecen reflexiones personales acerca de cómo puede manifestarse este proceso. [Publisher, Chinese] 生态焦虑和生态愤怒的语境化:对内脏和神性情感的试探性回应。 在本文中, 作者探讨了生态焦虑和生态愤怒的情绪可能是对为对气候危机的建设性反应。他们研究了这些情绪被体验和表达的背景, 并与人类与自然的关系相关联, 认为这些生态情绪既是内脏的又是神圣的。作者认为, 在我们要决定如何最好地应对生态焦虑和生态愤怒时, 这种双重性的特征至关重要, 他们提出应从想象和意象的领域寻求应对这一挑战的合适方法。对于这一过程可能出现的情况, 作者进行了个人的反思。.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20221128 Date Completed: 20221129 Latest Revision: 20221206
رمز التحديث: 20240829
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12870
PMID: 36440718
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1468-5922
DOI:10.1111/1468-5922.12870