دورية أكاديمية

Posts Supporting Anti-Environmental Policy in Brazil are Shared More on Social Media.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Posts Supporting Anti-Environmental Policy in Brazil are Shared More on Social Media.
المؤلفون: Forti LR; Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. lucas_forti@yahoo.com.br.; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. lucas_forti@yahoo.com.br.; Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Av. Francisco Mota, 572 - Costa e Silva, 59625-900, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. lucas_forti@yahoo.com.br., Travassos MLO; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.; Pós-Graduação em Conservação e Manejo da Biodiversidade, Universidade Católica do Salvador, Av. Prof. Pinto de Aguiar, 2589 - Pituaçu, CEP: 41740-090, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil., Coronel-Bejarano D; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil., Miranda DF; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil., Souza D; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil., Sabino J; Brazilian Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services - BPBES, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil., Szabo JK; Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina, CEP: 40170-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.; College of Engineering, IT and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.
المصدر: Environmental management [Environ Manage] 2023 Jun; Vol. 71 (6), pp. 1188-1198. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 28.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7703893 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-1009 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0364152X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Manage Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: New York Ny : Springer Verlag
Original Publication: New York, Springer-Verlag.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Ecosystem* , Social Media*, Animals ; Cattle ; Brazil ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Environmental Policy
مستخلص: Weakening environmental laws supported by disinformation are currently of concern in Brazil. An example of disinformation is the case of the "firefighter cattle". Supporters of this idea believe that by consuming organic mass, cattle decrease the risk of fire in natural ecosystems. This statement was cited by a member of the Bolsonaro government in response to the unprecedented 2020 fires in the Pantanal, as well as in support of a new law that enables extensive livestock in protected areas of this biome. By suggesting that grazing benefits the ecosystem, the "firefighter cattle" argument supports the interests of agribusiness. However, it ignores the real costs of livestock production on biodiversity. We analysed the social repercussion of the "firefighter cattle" by analysing public reactions to YouTube, Facebook, and Google News posts. These videos and articles and the responses to them either agreed or disagreed with the "firefighter cattle". Supportive posts were shared more on social media and triggered more interactions than critical posts. Even though many netizens disagreed with the idea of "firefighter cattle", it has gone viral, and was used as a tool to strengthen anti-environmental policies. We advocate that government institutions should use resources and guidelines provided by the scientific community to raise awareness. These materials include international reports produced by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We need to curb pseudoscience and misinformation in political discourse, avoiding misconceptions that threaten natural resources and confuse global society.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
References: Abdulkabir M, Udokang AE, Tunde RS, Kemi BL (2015) An empirical study of generalized linear model for count data. J Appl Comput Math 4:253. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9679.1000253. (PMID: 10.4172/2168-9679.1000253)
Abessa D, Famá A, Buruaem L (2019) The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts. Nat Ecol Evol 3:510–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9. (PMID: 10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9)
AlDayel A, Magdy W (2022) Characterizing the role of bots’ in polarized stance on social media. Soc Netw Anal Min 12:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00858-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s13278-022-00858-z)
Alho CJR, Simone BM, Benites M, Andrade BS, Sepúlveda JJ (2019) Threats to the biodiversity of the Brazilian Pantanal due to land use and occupation. Ambient Soc 22:e01891. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc201701891vu2019L3AO. (PMID: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc201701891vu2019L3AO)
Ari I, Sari R (2017) Differentiation of developed and developing countries for the Paris Agreement. Energy Strategy Rev 18:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.016)
Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de Mato Grosso (2021) Deputados aprovam projeto que altera política de proteção da bacia pantaneira. https://www.al.mt.gov.br/midia/texto/deputados-aprovam-projeto-que-altera-politica-de-protecao-da-bacia-pantaneira/visualizar . Accessed 31 Mar 2021.
Atwoli L, Baqui AH, Benfield T, Bosurgi R, Godlee F, Hancocks S, Horton R, Laybourn-Langton L, Monteiro CA, Norman I, Patrick K, Praities N, Rikkert MGMO, Rubin EJ, Sahni P, Smith R, Talley NJ, Turale S, Vázquez D (2021) Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health. J Health Popul Nutr 40:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuab067. (PMID: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab067)
Barbosa LG, Alves MAS, Grelle CEV (2021) Actions against sustainability: dismantling of the environmental policies in Brazil. Land Use Policy 104:105384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105384. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105384)
Barona E, Ramankutty N, Hyman G, Coomes OT (2010) The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5:024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002. (PMID: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002)
Bartlett J (2019) The people vs tech: how the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). Ebury Press, London.
Berndt A, Tomkins NW (2013) Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil. Animal 7:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000670. (PMID: 10.1017/S1751731113000670)
Betsch C (2017) Advocating for vaccination in a climate of science denial. Nat Microbiol 2:17106. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.106. (PMID: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.106)
Bezerra FGS, de Toledo PM, von Randow C, de Aguiar APD, Lima PVPS, dos Anjos LJS, Bezerra KRA (2022) Spatio-temporal analysis of dynamics and future scenarios of anthropic pressure on biomes in Brazil. Ecol Indic 137:108749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108749. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108749)
Bounegru L, Gray J, Venturini T, Mauri M (2018) A field guide to” fake news” and other information disorders: a collection of recipes for those who love to cook with digital methods. Public Data Lab, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3097666.
Brady WJ, Gantman AP, Bavel JJV (2020) Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral. J Exp Psychol Gen 149:746. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000673. (PMID: 10.1037/xge0000673)
Canal Rural (2020) Boi bombeiro: estudo aponta que quanto maior o rebanho, menor incidência de focos de incêndio. https://www.canalrural.com.br/noticias/pecuaria/boi/boi-bombeiro-maior-rebanho-menor-incendio/ Accessed 29 March.
Canal UOL (2021). Bolsonaro sobre meio ambiente: ‘Entre uma perereca e nossa vida, a gente fica com a nossa vida’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=otiKlygCSe4 . Accessed 1 April.
CBD (2020) https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/.
CNN Brasil (2021) ‘É preciso mudar a legislação ambiental, diz Bolsonaro. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/e-preciso-mudar-a-legislacao-ambiental-diz-bolsonaro/ . Accessed 1 April.
Cobos TL (2022) Origin and weight of news media outlets indexed on Google News: an exploration of the editions from Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico. Braz Journalism Res 17:28–63. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v17n1.2021.1331. (PMID: 10.25200/BJR.v17n1.2021.1331)
Coelho AJP, Magnago LFS, Matos FAR, Mota NM, Diniz ES, Alves Meira-Neto JAA (2020) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on biodiversity and biomass stock of Cerrado, the Brazilian savanna. Biodivers Conserv 29:3151–3168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02013-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s10531-020-02013-6)
Crouzeilles R, Feltran-Barbieri R, Ferreira MS, Strassburg BBN (2017) Hard times for the Brazilian environment. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1213. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0303-7. (PMID: 10.1038/s41559-017-0303-7)
Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695. https://igraph.org .
Da Empoli G (2019) Os engenheiros do caos: como as fake news, as teorias da conspiração e os algoritmos estão sendo utilizados para disseminar ódio, medo e influenciar eleições. Vestígio Editora, São Paulo.
Dean W (1996) A ferro e fogo: a história e a devastação da Mata Atlântica brasileira. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 484 pp.
Drummond J, Barros-Platiau AF (2006) Brazilian environmental laws and policies, 1934–2002: a critical overview. Law Policy 28:83–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00218.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00218.x)
Esteves B (2021) O fabulador oculto: a trajetória e os métodos de Evaristo de Miranda, o ideólogo da política ambiental de Bolsonaro. In: Revista Piauí, 174. https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/o-fabulador-oculto/ .
FAO (2022) ‘ https://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/197623/icode/#:~:text=By%20the%20numbers%3A%20GHG%20emissions,of%20all%20anthropogenic%20GHG%20emissions .’.
Farrell J, McConnell K, Brulle R (2019) Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nat Clim Change 9:191–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6. (PMID: 10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6)
Fearnside PM (2016) Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Science 353:746–748. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag025. (PMID: 10.1126/science.aag025)
Ferrante L, Fearnside PM (2019) Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environ Conserv 46:261–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000213. (PMID: 10.1017/S0376892919000213)
Forti LR, Rossi-Santos M, Nunes JACC (2021) Assess before changing Brazil’s shipping policy. Science 372:139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh36. (PMID: 10.1126/science.abh36)
Fünfgeld A (2021) “Brazil must be back!” – but real climate action is possible only after bolsonaro. GIGA Focus Latin America, 6. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-76295-4.
Funk WC, Caminer M, Ron SR (2012) High levels of cryptic species diversity uncovered in Amazonian frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 279:1806–1814. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1653. (PMID: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1653)
Gallardo ALCF, Bond A (2011) Capturing the implications of land use change in Brazil through environmental assessment: time for a strategic approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.002)
Garcia LC, Szabo JK, de Oliveira Roque F, de Matos Martins Pereira A, Nunes da Cunha C, Damasceno-Júnior GA, Morato RG, Tomas WM, Libonati R, Ribeiro DB (2021) Record-breaking wildfires in the world’s largest continuous tropical wetland: Integrative fire management is urgently needed for both biodiversity and humans. J Environ Manag 293:112870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112870. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112870)
Gerhard U, Hoelscher M, Wilson D (2016) Inequalities in creative cities: issues, approaches, comparisons. Springer, New York.
Goldenberg A, Gross JJ (2020) Digital emotion contagion. Trends Cogn Sci 24:316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009)
Gorwa R, Guilbeault D (2020) Unpacking the social media bot: a typology to guide research and policy. Policy Internet 12:225–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.184. (PMID: 10.1002/poi3.184)
Hansson SO (2020) Social constructionism and climate science denial. Eur J Philos Sci 10:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00305-w. (PMID: 10.1007/s13194-020-00305-w)
Hui D, Deng Q, Tian H, Luo Y (2017) Climate change and carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Handbook of climate change mitigation and adaptation, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_13-2.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2015) ‘População Rural e Urbana, https://educa.ibge.gov.br/jovens/conheca-o-brasil/populacao/18313-populacao-rural-e-urbana.html . Accessed 25 March.
Ioris RR, Ioris AAR (2013) Assessing development and the idea of development in the 1950s in Brazil. Rev Econ Polit 33:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572013000300003. (PMID: 10.1590/S0101-31572013000300003)
Issberner L-R, Léna P (eds.) (2016). Brazil in the anthropocene: conflicts between predatory development and environmental policies. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon.
Jornal Hoje (2020) Por que a teoria do “boi bombeiro” no Pantanal, citada pela ministra da Agricultura, é mito, https://g1.globo.com/natureza/noticia/2020/09/17/ambientalistas-explicam-por-que-boi-bombeiro-e-reservas-incendiarias-no-pantanal-citados-porsalles-sao-mito.ghtml . Accessed 29 March.
Junk WJ, Nunes da Cunha C, Wantzen KM, Petermann P, Strüssmann C, Marques MI, Adis J (2006) Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci 68:278–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-006-0851-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s00027-006-0851-4)
Kar P, Xue Z, Ardakani SP, Kwong CF (2022). Are fake images bothering you on social network? Let us detect them using recurrent neural network. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3159709.
Kelly LT, Giljohann KM, Duane A, Aquilué N, Archibald S, Batllori E, Bennett AF, Buckland ST, Canelles Q, Clarke MF, Fortin M-J, Hermoso V, Herrando S, Keane RE, Lake FK, McCarthy MA, Morán-Ordóñez A, Parr CL, Pausas JG, Penman TD, Regos A, Rumpff L, Santos JL, Smith AL, Syphard AD, Tingley MW, Brotons L (2020) Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Science 370:eabb0355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb0355. (PMID: 10.1126/science.abb0355)
Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol 19:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00702.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00702.x)
Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123(1–2):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032. (PMID: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032)
Latin America Reports (2019) Bolsonaro’s weaponized social media. https://latinamericareports.com/bolsonaros-weaponized-social-media/1342/ . Accessed 1 April.
Luceri L, Deb A, Badawy A, Ferrara E (2019) “Red bots do it better: comparative analysis of social bot partisan behavior.” In: Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference (WWW ’19 Companion), May 13–17, 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316735 .
Mao WX, Wang WP, Sun HF (2020) Optimization path for overcoming barriers in China’s environmental protection institutional system. J Clean Prod 251:119712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119712. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119712)
Mapbiomas (2019) https://mapbiomas.org/ .
Marengo JA, Cunha AP, Cuartas LA, Deusdara Leal KR, Broedel E, Seluchi ME, Michelin CM, De Praga Baião CF, Ângulo EC, Almeida EK, Kazmierczak ML, Mateus NPA, Silva RC, Bender F (2021) Extreme drought in the Brazilian Pantanal in 2019–2020: characterization, causes, and impacts. Front Water 3:13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.639204. (PMID: 10.3389/frwa.2021.639204)
Massarani L, Castelfranchi Y, Mendes I, Fagundes VO, Moreira I (2021) Science in society: what young Brazilians think about S&T. An Acad Bras Ciênc 93:e20200204. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120200204. (PMID: 10.1590/0001-3765202120200204)
Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Mittermeier CG (eds.) (1997) Megadiversity: Earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. CEMEX, Agrupación Serra Madre, S.C., Mexico.
Ministério da Economia (2020) Correlação entre a densidade do rebanho bovino e a incidência de focos de incêndio por área. https://direitoambiental.com/correlacao-entre-a-densidade-do-rebanho-bovino-e-a-incidencia-de-focos-de-incendio-por-area/ . Accessed 29 March.
O’Connor C, Weatherall JO (2019) The misinformation age: how false beliefs spread. Yale University Press, London.
Observa-MT (2021) Observatório Socioambiental de Mato Grosso - Entenda porque o PL 561 representa retrocesso na proteção ao Pantanal. https://observamt.org.br/noticia/entenda-porque-o-pl-561-representa-retrocesso-na-protecao-ao-pantanal/ . Accessed 29 Mar 2021.
Oeco (2021) Bolsonaro pode rever extinção do Ministério do Meio Ambiente. https://oeco.org.br/noticias/bolsonaro-pode-rever-extincao-do-ministerio-do-meio-ambiente/ . Accessed 31 Mar 2021.
Otero I, Farrell KN, Pueyo S, Kallis G, Kehoe L, Haberl H, Plutzar C, Hobson P, García-Márquez J, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Martin J-L, Erb K-H, Schindler S, Nielsen J, Skorin T, Settele J, Essl F, Gómez-Baggethun E, Brotons L, Rabitsch W, Schneider F, Pe’er G (2020) Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conserv Lett 13:e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12713. (PMID: 10.1111/conl.12713)
Pardo S (2020). Generalized linear models. In: Statistical analysis of empirical data. Springer, Cham.
Pereira, de Area Leão EJ, Ferreira PJS, de Santana Ribeiro LC, Carvalho TS, de Barros Pereira HB (2019) Policy in Brazil (2016–2019) threaten conservation of the Amazon rainforest. Environ Sci Policy 100:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.001)
Pott A, Oliveira AKM, Damasceno-Junior GA, Silva JSV (2011) Plant diversity of the Pantanal wetland. Braz J Biol 71:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842011000200005. (PMID: 10.1590/S1519-69842011000200005)
Pott A, Pott VJ (2004) Features and conservation of the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. Wetl Ecol Manag 12:547–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-005-1754-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s11273-005-1754-1)
R Core Development Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Rajão R, Nobre AD, Cunha ELTP, Duarte TR, Marcolino C, Soares-Filho B, Sparovek G, Rodrigues RR, Valera C, Bustamante M, Nobre C, Santos de Lima L (2022) The risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policies. Biol Conserv 266:109447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109447. (PMID: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109447)
Revista Globo Rural (2020) Bolsonaro volta a defender uso do “boi-bombeiro” para reduzir queimadas no Pantanal, https://globorural.globo.com/Noticias/Sustentabilidade/noticia/2020/11/bolsonaro-volta-defender-uso-do-boi-bombeiro-para-reduzir-queimadas-nopantanal.html . Accessed 29 March.
Ruggeri J, Forti LR (2021) Trade resolution further threatens Brazil’s amphibians. Nature 593(7860):510. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01412-1. (PMID: 10.1038/d41586-021-01412-1)
Schöne JP, Parkinson B, Goldenberg A (2021) Negativity spreads more than positivity on twitter after both positive and negative political situations. Affect Sci 2:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7)
Silman MR (2007) Plant species diversity in Amazonian forests. In: Tropical rainforest responses to climatic change. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48842-2_10.
Silva HM (2021) Wildfires and Brazilian irrationality on social networks. Ethics Sci Environ Politics 21:11–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00194. (PMID: 10.3354/esep00194)
Silva Junior, Celso HL, Alvarado ST, Celentano D, Rousseau GX, Hernández LM, Ferraz TM, Silva FB, de Melo MH, Rodrigues TC, Viegas JC, Souza UD (2021) Northeast Brazil’s imperiled Cerrado. Science 372:139–140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0556. (PMID: 10.1126/science.abg0556)
Silva Junior, Celso HL, Pessôa ACM, Carvalho NS, Reis JBC, Anderson LO, Aragão LEOC (2021) The Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate in 2020 is the greatest of the decade. Nat Ecol Evol 5:144–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01368-x. (PMID: 10.1038/s41559-020-01368-x)
Souza JR, Carlos M, Shimbo JZ, Rosa MR, Parente LL, Alencar AA, Rudorff BFT, Hasenack H, Matsumoto M, Ferreira LG, Souza-Filho PWM, de Oliveira SW, Rocha WF, Fonseca AV, Marques CB, Diniz CG, Costa D, Monteiro D, Rosa ER, Vélez-Martin E, Weber EJ, Lenti FEB, Paternost FF, Pareyn FGC, Siqueira JV, Viera JL, Ferreira Neto LC, Saraiva MM, Sales MH, Salgado MPG, Vasconcelos R, Galano S, Mesquita VV, Azevedo T (2020) Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sens 12:2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735. (PMID: 10.3390/rs12172735)
Strassburg, Bernardo BN, Iribarrem A, Beyer HL, Cordeiro CL, Crouzeilles R, Jakovac CC, Junqueira AB, Lacerda E, Latawiec AE, Balmford A, Brooks TM (2020) Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586:724–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9. (PMID: 10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9)
Trenberth KE, Dai A, van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, Sheffield J (2014) Global warming and changes in drought. Nat Clim Change 4:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2067. (PMID: 10.1038/nclimate2067)
Vacchiano MC, Santos JWMC, Angeoletto F, Silva NM (2019) Do data support claims that Brazil leads the world in environmental preservation?. Environ Conserv 46:118–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892918000371. (PMID: 10.1017/S0376892918000371)
Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359:1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9. (PMID: 10.1126/science.aap9)
Ward, MS, Simmonds JS, Reside AE, Watson JEM, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Trezise JA, Fletcher R, File L, Taylor M (2019) Lots of loss with little scrutiny: the attrition of habitat critical for threatened species in Australia. Conserv Sci Pract: e117. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.117.
Zalles V, Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Stehman SV, Tyukavina A, Pickens A, Song X-P, Adusei B, Okpa C, Aguilar R (2019) Near doubling of Brazil’s intensive row crop area since 2000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:428–435. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810301115. (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.1810301115)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Brazil; Deforestation; Environmentalism; Fake news; Grazing; Pantanal
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20221128 Date Completed: 20230516 Latest Revision: 20230729
رمز التحديث: 20230729
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01757-x
PMID: 36443526
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1432-1009
DOI:10.1007/s00267-022-01757-x