دورية أكاديمية

Surface Landmarks in the Lateral Decubitus Position Are Unreliable for Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement: A Case Series.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Surface Landmarks in the Lateral Decubitus Position Are Unreliable for Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement: A Case Series.
المؤلفون: Dobson SW; From the Departments of Anesthesiology., Weller RS; From the Departments of Anesthesiology., Turner JD; From the Departments of Anesthesiology., Lack CM; Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina., Henshaw DS; From the Departments of Anesthesiology.
المصدر: A&A practice [A A Pract] 2022 Dec 21; Vol. 16 (12), pp. e01649. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 21 (Print Publication: 2022).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101714112 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2575-3126 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 25753126 NLM ISO Abbreviation: A A Pract Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [Philadelphia, PA] : Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., [2018]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Analgesia, Epidural*/methods , Anesthesia, Epidural*/methods , Thoracic Surgical Procedures*, Humans ; Epidural Space ; Catheters
مستخلص: Thoracic epidurals remain the optimal method for providing postoperative analgesia after complex open abdominal and thoracic surgeries. However, they can be challenging to both place and maintain, as evidenced by a failure rate that exceeds 30%.1 Proper identification of the epidural space and accurate placement of the catheter are critical in order to deliver effective postoperative analgesia and avoid failure.2,3 This case series investigated the difficulty in correctly identifying the proper vertebral level for thoracic epidural catheter procedures when performed in the lateral decubitus position.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society.)
References: Tran DQ, Van Zundert TC, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Finlayson RJ. Primary failure of thoracic epidural analgesia in training centers: the invisible elephant? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:309–313.
Visser WA, Liem TH, van Egmond J, Gielen MJ. Extension of sensory blockade after thoracic epidural administration of a test dose of lidocaine at three different levels. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:332–335.
Yokoyama M, Hanazaki M, Fujii H, et al. Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology . 2004;100:1504–1510.
Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of post-operative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA . 2003;290:2455–2463.
Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC. Reliability of Tuffier’s line as an anatomic landmark. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:E161–E165.
Lin N, Li Y, Bebawy JF, Dong J, Hua L. Abdominal circumference but not the degree of lumbar flexion affects the accuracy of lumbar interspace identification by Tuffier’s line palpation method: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol . 2015;15:9.
Haneline MT, Cooperstein R, Young MD, Ross J. Determining spinal level using the inferior angle of the scapula as a reference landmark: a retrospective analysis of 50 radiographs. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2008;52:24–29.
Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ,, Gawne-Cain M, Russel R. Ability of anaesthetist to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–1126.
Dobson SW, Weller RS, Edwards C, et al. A randomized comparison of loss of resistance versus loss of resistance plus electrical stimulation: effect on success of thoracic epidural placement. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:43.
Lirk P, Messner H, Deibl M, et al. Accuracy in estimating the correct intervertebral space level during lumbar, thoracic and cervical epidural anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:347–349.
Holmaas G, Frederiksen D, Ulvik A, Vingsnes SO, Østgaard G, Nordli H. Identification of thoracic intervertebral spaces by means of surface anatomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:368–373.
Choi DH, Lee SM, Cho HS, Ahn HJ. Relationship between the bevel of the Tuohy needle and catheter direction in thoracic epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:105–112.
Auyong DB, Hostetter L, Yuan SC, Slee AE, Hanson NA. Evaluation of ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural placement in patients undergoing upper abdominal and thoracic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:204–209.
Parra MC, Washburn K, Brown JR, et al. Fluoroscopic guidance increases the incidence of thoracic epidural catheter placement within the epidural space: a randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:17–24.
Goobie SM, Montgomery CJ, Basu R, et al. Confirmation of direct epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:984–988.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230104 Date Completed: 20230106 Latest Revision: 20230202
رمز التحديث: 20230203
DOI: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001649
PMID: 36599018
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2575-3126
DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001649