دورية أكاديمية

Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: How We Do It.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: How We Do It.
المؤلفون: Enderes J; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany., Pillny C; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany., Matthaei H; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany., Manekeller S; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany., Kalff JC; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany., Glowka TR; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
المصدر: Biology [Biology (Basel)] 2023 Jan 22; Vol. 12 (2). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 22.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: MDPI Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101587988 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2079-7737 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20797737 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Biology (Basel) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Basel, Switzerland : MDPI, 2012-
مستخلص: (1) Background: This study's goals were to investigate possible risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C according to the updated definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery and to analyze possible treatment strategies; (2) Methods: Between 2017 and 2021, 200 patients were analyzed regarding the development of POPF grade B/C with an emphasis on postoperative outcome and treatment strategies; (3) Results: POPF grade B/C was observed in 39 patients (19.5%). These patients were younger, mainly male, had fewer comorbidities and showed a higher body mass index. Also, they had lower CA-19 levels, a smaller tumor size and softer pancreatic parenchyma. They experienced a worse outcome without affecting the overall mortality rate (10% vs. 6%, p = 0.481), however, this lead to a prolonged postoperative stay (28 (32-36) d vs. 20 (15-28) d, p ≤ 0.001). The majority of patients with POPF grade B/C were able to receive conservative treatment, followed by drainage placement, endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy (EVT) and surgery. Conservative treatment resulted in a shorter length of the postoperative stay (24 (22-28) d vs. 34 (26-43) d, p = 0.012); (4) Conclusions: Patients developing POPF grade B/C had a worse outcome; however, this did not affect the overall mortality rate. The majority of the patients were able to receive conservative treatment, resulting in a shorter length of their hospital stay.
References: Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):344-52. (PMID: 26727086)
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Jul;10(2):299-310. (PMID: 26240633)
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 07;22(9):. (PMID: 34067040)
Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):334-340. (PMID: 30829699)
Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. (PMID: 16003309)
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):425. (PMID: 34772366)
Br J Surg. 2013 Nov;100(12):1597-605. (PMID: 24264781)
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):440-9. (PMID: 26135690)
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Aug;199(2):198-203. (PMID: 15275873)
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 Sep;297(3):G434-41. (PMID: 19608732)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Oct;13(10):1845-51. (PMID: 19639369)
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. (PMID: 23643139)
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 14;362(2):129-37. (PMID: 20071702)
BMC Surg. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):24. (PMID: 28320386)
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(8):1128-1134. (PMID: 30951614)
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Oct;399(7):801-10. (PMID: 25173359)
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May 16;11(5):329-344. (PMID: 31205594)
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. (PMID: 28040257)
Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E141-2. (PMID: 23716102)
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1058-64. (PMID: 18043111)
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):761-8. (PMID: 17981197)
Clin Anat. 2007 Nov;20(8):933-42. (PMID: 17879305)
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;85(4):350-5. (PMID: 2183589)
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):215-6. (PMID: 20622651)
World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4207-4213. (PMID: 32816084)
Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):591-600. (PMID: 25061003)
Asian J Surg. 2022 Aug;45(8):1519-1524. (PMID: 34642049)
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5. (PMID: 17629996)
World J Surg. 2005 Apr;29(4):505-12. (PMID: 15770371)
Science. 2019 Jun 21;364(6446):1156-1162. (PMID: 31221853)
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. (PMID: 15273542)
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3708-3720. (PMID: 35246738)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Mar;22(3):438-443. (PMID: 29330723)
Zentralbl Chir. 2020 Feb;145(1):27-34. (PMID: 30206909)
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 19;11(24):. (PMID: 36556127)
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Dec;14(12):812-7. (PMID: 23134182)
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):937-943. (PMID: 29240007)
Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):702-9. (PMID: 18778804)
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):1-14. (PMID: 23122535)
Br J Surg. 2013 Nov;100(12):1589-96. (PMID: 24264780)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Whipple; endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy; pancreatic fistula; pancreaticoduodenectomy
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230225 Latest Revision: 20230228
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC9952935
DOI: 10.3390/biology12020178
PMID: 36829457
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2079-7737
DOI:10.3390/biology12020178