دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparison of the efficacy and perioperative pain between vessel sealing and suture ligation for median celiotomy in canine ovariohysterectomy.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of the efficacy and perioperative pain between vessel sealing and suture ligation for median celiotomy in canine ovariohysterectomy.
المؤلفون: Sunghan J; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand., Manmoo S; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand., Suriyasathaporn W; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand.; Department of Companion Animal and Wildlife Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.; Research Center of Producing and Development of Products and Innovations for Animal Health and Production, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.; Cambodia Campus, Asian Satellite Campuses Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan., Suriyasathaporn W; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand.; Department of Companion Animal and Wildlife Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.; Research Center of Producing and Development of Products and Innovations for Animal Health and Production, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.; Cambodia Campus, Asian Satellite Campuses Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan., Warrit K; Department of Companion Animal and Wildlife Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand., Kusolphat P; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand.
المصدر: Veterinary world [Vet World] 2023 Feb; Vol. 16 (2), pp. 386-394. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 28.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Veterinary World Country of Publication: India NLM ID: 101504872 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0972-8988 (Print) Linking ISSN: 09728988 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Vet World Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Dist. Morbi (Gujarat), India : Veterinary World
Original Publication: Rajkot (Gujarat), India : Veterinary World, [2008]-
مستخلص: Background and Aim: Vessel sealing (VS) is used widely in human medicine and veterinary practice during laparoscopic surgery; however, few studies have investigated VS in canine ovariohysterectomy (OHE) using the median celiotomy approach. This study aimed to compare the effect of VS and suture ligation (SL) on surgical time, blood loss, and perioperative pain in canine OHE through median celiotomy.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight dogs were randomly and equally assigned into two groups that underwent surgery either by SL at both the ovarian pedicle and uterus or using a disposable VS device. The short form of the Glasgow composite pain scale (SF-GCPS) and the Colorado state university canine acute pain scale (CSU-CAP) were used to determine pain pre-operatively (baseline); at 30 min; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 72 h post-operatively. Perioperative physiological parameters, surgical duration, and percentage of blood loss were recorded. Repeated measures analysis was performed to determine the differences in all parameters among time-related tasks and between both groups. A significant difference was defined at p < 0.05.
Results: The duration from identification of the first ovary to uterus removal was shorter in VS than in SL (p < 0.05). No clinically relevant differences were found among physiological variables. Both groups showed higher SF-GCPS and CSU-CAP values after surgery compared with baseline. The SF-GCPS in SL at 1 h was higher than in VS (p < 0.05). Two dogs in the SL group required additional post-operative rescue analgesia. No differences were found between the groups in terms of blood loss.
Conclusion: The use of a VS device in dogs undergoing OHE celiotomy decreased post-operative pain and shortened the perioperative time, making it an effective alternative technique for this common surgery. However, the VS device must be applied 2-3 times in the same location during the OHE procedure to prevent technical failure. This disposable device was reused up to 5 times for economic reasons without device failure. Soft tissue damage during OHE using the VS device should be investigated in a future prospective study.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
(Copyright: © Sunghan, et al.)
References: Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2018 Jul;48(4):639-661. (PMID: 29933767)
Am J Vet Res. 2012 Feb;73(2):302-5. (PMID: 22280394)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Sep 15;227(6):921-7. (PMID: 16190590)
Vet Rec. 2015 Jan 31;176(5):125. (PMID: 25344574)
Vet Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;28(6):472-9. (PMID: 10582745)
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 May;7(2):95-101. (PMID: 24754878)
Vet Rec. 2005 Dec 24-31;157(26):829-33. (PMID: 16377787)
Vet World. 2018 Dec;11(12):1725-1735. (PMID: 30774265)
Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Nov 17;58(1):80. (PMID: 27855712)
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2019 Nov 18;7(1):43-54. (PMID: 31819890)
Vet Sci. 2020 Jul 21;7(3):. (PMID: 32708066)
Healthc Technol Lett. 2018 Jul 17;5(4):124-129. (PMID: 30155264)
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2013 Dec;11(6):592-7. (PMID: 24396335)
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2005 Jul;32(4):184-92. (PMID: 16008715)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Aug 15;251(4):443-450. (PMID: 28763276)
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Nov 8;14(1):335. (PMID: 30409200)
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 12;7:342. (PMID: 32596276)
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. (PMID: 29026331)
Res Vet Sci. 2011 Aug;91(1):159-163. (PMID: 20888021)
Can Vet J. 2016 Jul;57(7):741-6. (PMID: 27429462)
Vet Surg. 2005 May-Jun;34(3):273-82. (PMID: 16115085)
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2022 Mar 1;58(2):55-76. (PMID: 35195712)
N Z Vet J. 2022 Sep;70(5):256-262. (PMID: 35593168)
Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-773. (PMID: 15728066)
J Feline Med Surg. 2015 Mar;17(3):251-72. (PMID: 25701863)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Nov 1;221(9):1268-75. (PMID: 12418691)
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2015 Mar-Apr;51(2):67-84. (PMID: 25764070)
Acta Cir Bras. 2014 Oct;29(10):633-8. (PMID: 25317994)
J Physiol. 1943 Dec 31;102(3):290-305. (PMID: 16991609)
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2015 Jan-Feb;51(1):1-7. (PMID: 25415216)
J Feline Med Surg. 2018 Dec;20(12):1119-1123. (PMID: 29359610)
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2892-901. (PMID: 22538684)
Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. (PMID: 16698416)
Can Vet J. 2017 Nov;58(11):1191-1194. (PMID: 29089657)
Vet World. 2020 Jan;13(1):160-164. (PMID: 32158166)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Dec 1;239(11):1409-12. (PMID: 22087712)
Vet Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):62-9. (PMID: 14687188)
Vet Rec. 2011 Aug 13;169(7):177-8. (PMID: 21840954)
J Small Anim Pract. 1973 May;14(5):257-66. (PMID: 4796401)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015 Jan 15;246(2):212-5. (PMID: 25554937)
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0221488. (PMID: 31430327)
J Small Anim Pract. 1998 Oct;39(10):469-74. (PMID: 9816569)
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008 Nov;35(6):537-42. (PMID: 18980628)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: ligation; ovariohysterectomy; post-operative pain; vessel sealing
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230412 Latest Revision: 20230413
رمز التحديث: 20230413
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10082707
DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.386-394
PMID: 37042013
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:0972-8988
DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2023.386-394