دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Short implants: Influence of different diameters, torques, and transmucosal heights of straight prosthetic abutments on screw preload loss after cycling.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Short implants: Influence of different diameters, torques, and transmucosal heights of straight prosthetic abutments on screw preload loss after cycling.
المؤلفون: da Silva KRN; Division of Oral Implantology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil., Teixeira LN; Division of Cell Biology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil., Teixeira ML; Division of Prosthodontics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil., Ambrosano GB; Departament of Genetics, Laboratory of Statistical Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Martinez EF; Division of Cell Biology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
المصدر: European journal of oral sciences [Eur J Oral Sci] 2023 Aug; Vol. 131 (4), pp. e12937. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 22.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9504563 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1600-0722 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09098836 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Oral Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Copenhagen : Munksgaard, c1995-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Dental Implant-Abutment Design* , Dental Implants*, Torque ; Dental Abutments ; Materials Testing ; Stress, Mechanical ; Bone Screws ; Dental Stress Analysis
مستخلص: This study evaluated the influence of different implant diameters, insertion torques, and transmucosal heights on the loosening of abutments installed on short implants, after mechanical cycling. The Morse taper connection implants (n = 96) tested were 5 mm high, divided according to the platform diameter: 4 or 6 mm. A universal abutment was coupled to each implant (with different transmucosal heights: 1 or 5 mm). The sets were subdivided into 20- and 32-Ncm torque. After the cycle fatigue test, the detorque values were measured with a digital torque indicator. After mechanical cycling, the mean detorque values obtained for the abutment with 20-Ncm insertion torque were lower than for implants with 32-Ncm insertion torque, regardless of the platform diameter or transmucosal height. In the 20-Ncm torque group, there was no statistically significant difference in the detorque values between platform diameters or transmucosal heights. Otherwise, for 32-Ncm sets, a smaller platform diameter (4 mm), and a longer transmucosal height (5 mm) showed the lowest detorque values. In conclusion, implants placed with 32-Ncm insertion torque and abutments with 1 mm transmucosal height and a 6 mm implant diameter demonstrated the highest detorque values.
(© 2023 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early Loading of single crowns supported by 6mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2-years follow-up cohort study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010;21:937-43.
Plonka AB, Urban IA, Wang HL. Decision tree for vertical ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38:269-75.
Taschieri S, Lolato A, Testori T, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: three-year results of a randomized clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:9-20.
Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11:385-95.
Renouard F, Nisand D,Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Impl Dent and Rel Res. 2005;7:s104-10.
Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. Periodontol J. 2006;77:1340-7.
Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in function. A retrospective study. Periodontol J. 2004;75:327-32.
Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. Periodontol J. 2008;79:42-8.
Rossi F, Botticelli D, Cesaretti G, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:458-64.
Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns-a prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:471-7.
Slotte C, Grønningsaeter A, Halmøy AM, Öhrnell LO, Mordenfeld A, Isaksson S, Johansson LÅ Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-year outcomes of a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 (Suppl 2): e385-95.
Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Dent Implant. 2005;14:312-21.
Bidez M, Misch CE. Clinical biomechanics in implant dentistry. In: Misch CE, editor. Dental implant prosthetics. St Louis: Elsevier; 2015. p. 95-106.
Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant protected occlusion, a biomechanical rationale. Compendium. 1994:15:1330,1332;1334.
Siadat H, Pirmoazen S, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M. Does abutment collar length affect abutment screw loosening after cyclic loading? J Oral Implantol. 2015;41: 346-51.
Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:319-25.
Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1276-84.
Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenger of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:257-66.
Alshenaiber R, Silikas N, Barclay C. Does the length of mini dental implants affect their resistance to failure by overloading? Dent J (Basel). 2022;10:117.
Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentitry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28-35.
Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Sega-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29:479-87.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Cohen J. A power prime. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155-9.
Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):35-51.
Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: an overview. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29:242-5.
Alves DCC, de Carvalho PSP, Elias CN, Vedovatto E, Martinez EF. In vitro analysis of the microbiological sealing of tapered implants after mechanical cycling. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2437-45.
International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14801. http://www.iso.org/iso/home.html (2016). Accessed 20 Nov 2022.
Hadzik J, Krawiec M, Kubasiewicz-Ross P, Prylińska-Czyżewska A, Gedrange T, Dominiak M. Short implants and conventional implants in the residual maxillary alveolar ridge: a 36-month follow-up observation. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:5645-52.
Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 2005;14:108-16.
Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Pinas L, Begona L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:682-9.
El-Sheikh MAY, Mostafa TMN, El-Sheikh MM. Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading. Int J Dent Implant. 2018;4:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0149-z.
Lillo R, Parra C, Fuentes R, Borie Engelke W, Beltrán V. Compressive resistance of abutments with different diameters and transmucosal heights in Morse-taper implants. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:156-9.
Borie E, Leal E, Orsi IA, Salamanca C, Dias FJ, Weber B. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2018;21:91-7.
Bordin D, Cury AADB, Faot F. Influence of abutment collar height and implant length on stress distribution in single crowns. Braz Dent J. 2019;30:238-43.
da Silva KRN, Joly JC, Peruzzo DC, Napimoga MH, Martinez EF. Influence of transmucosal height on loss of prosthetic abutment torque after mechanical cycling. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44:423-6.
Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang S-K. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:425-33.
Schneider D, Witt L, Hammerle CH. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:169-74.
Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;47:8-17.
Xu X, Hu B, Xu Y, Liu Q, Ding H, Xu L. Short versus standard implants for single-crown restorations in the posterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:530-8.
Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:1090-8.
Tawil G, Aboujaoud N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21:275-82.
Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, Raghoebar GM. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 (Suppl 18):243-52.
Al-Johany SS. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6.5 mm) placed in posterior edentulous ridges and factors affecting their survival after a 12-month follow-up period: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:605-21.
Ortega-Oller I, Suárez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Torrecillas-Martínez L, Monje A, Catena A, Wang HL. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2014;85:569-80.
Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:89-95.
Quaranta A, DʼIsidoro O, Bambini F, Putignano A. Potential bone to implant contact area of short versus standard implants: an in vitro micro-computed tomography analysis. Implant Dent. 2016;25:97-102.
Ting M, Palermo M, Donatelli DP, Gaughan JP, Suzuki JB, Jefferies SR. A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2.
Piermatti J, Yousef H, Luke A, Mahevich R, Weiner S. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems. Implant Dent. 2006;15:427-35.
Shin HM, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Chang BM, Jeong CM. Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:126-32.
Lee HW, Alkumru H, Ganss B, Lai JY, Ramp LC, Liu PR. The effect of contamination of implant screws on reverse torque. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:1054-60.
Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine preload implant. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:539-46.
Ferreira MB, Delben JA, Barão VA, Faverani LP, Dos Santos PH, Assunção WG. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:e631-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318270fe0e.
Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by ossointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:353-9.
Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. The relationship between implant preload and loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28:67-73.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: dental implant; dental implant-abutment design; loading
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Dental Implants)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230522 Date Completed: 20230721 Latest Revision: 20230724
رمز التحديث: 20240829
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12937
PMID: 37212743
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1600-0722
DOI:10.1111/eos.12937