Accuracy of wearable electronic device compared to manual and automatic methods of blood pressure determination.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	Accuracy of wearable electronic device compared to manual and automatic methods of blood pressure determination.
المؤلفون:	Lins LFTS; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Atirador Miguel Antonio da Silva St, Mossoró, RN, 59607-360, Brazil., do Nascimento EGC; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Atirador Miguel Antonio da Silva St, Mossoró, RN, 59607-360, Brazil., da Silva Júnior JA; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Atirador Miguel Antonio da Silva St, Mossoró, RN, 59607-360, Brazil. joseantonio.030@hotmail.com., de Medeiros Fernandes TAA; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Atirador Miguel Antonio da Silva St, Mossoró, RN, 59607-360, Brazil., de Andrade MF; Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Rural Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Mossoró, Brazil., de Mesquita Andrade C; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Atirador Miguel Antonio da Silva St, Mossoró, RN, 59607-360, Brazil.
المصدر:	Medical & biological engineering & computing [Med Biol Eng Comput] 2023 Oct; Vol. 61 (10), pp. 2627-2636. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 05.
نوع المنشور:	Journal Article
اللغة:	English
بيانات الدورية:	Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7704869 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1741-0444 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01400118 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Biol Eng Comput Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة:	Publication: New York, NY : Springer Original Publication: Stevenage, Eng., Peregrinus.
مواضيع طبية MeSH:	Wearable Electronic Devices* , Hypertension*/diagnosis, Young Adult ; Humans ; Blood Pressure Determination ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Blood Pressure/physiology ; Sphygmomanometers
مستخلص:	Blood pressure (BP) is the main biomarker for monitoring patients, as its lack of control above values considered normal is a modifiable risk factor for target organ damage. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the wearable electronic device photoplethysmography technology (PPG) Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 in determining BP in young patients compared to manual and automatic methods of BP determination. This is a quantitative and cross-sectional study, following validation protocols for wearable devices and BP measurement. It was carried out with twenty healthy young adults, in which BP was measured using four instruments, namely, standard sphygmomanometer device (manual), automatic arm oscillometric device (reference), wrist oscillometric device, and Smartwatch PPG. Eighty systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) readings were observed. SBP means manual 118 ± 2.20,arm 113 ± 2.54, wrist 118 ± 2.51, and PPG (smartwatch) 113 ± 2.58. Among means, arm and PPG difference is 0.15, arm and wrist 4.95, arm and manual 4.45 wrist with PPG. The mean DBP manual 76.7 ± 1.84, arm 73.6 ± 1.92, wrist 79.3 ± 1.87, and PPG 72.2 ± 1.38. Among means, the difference between the arm and PPG is 1.4 and arm and hand 3.5 mmHg. The correlation shows PPG with manual, arm, and wrist. There was a strong SBP correlation and a moderate DBP correlation between the methods tested, evidencing the accuracy of the PPG smartwatch in relation to the reference method. (© 2023. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.)
References:	John O, Campbell NRC, Brady TM, Farrell M, Varghese C, Berumen AV et al (2021) The 2020 “WHO technical specifications for automated non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices with cuff.” Hypertension. 77:806–812. (PMID: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.1662533517681) Mukkamala R, Hahn JO, Chandrasekhar A (2022) Photoplethysmography in noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Photoplethysmography 359–400. Barroso WKS, Rodrigues CIS, Bortolotto LA, Mota-Gomes MA, Brandão AA, Feitosa ADM, Machado CA et al (2021) Brazilian guidelines of hypertension - 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol 116(3):516–658. (PMID: 10.36660/abc.20201238339097619949730) Nilson EAF, Andrade RCS, Brito DA, Oliveira ML (2020) Costs attributable to obesity, hypertension and diabetes in the Unified Health System, Brazil, 2018. Rev Panam Salud Publica 44:e32. (PMID: 322847087147115) Charlton PH, Marozas V (2022) Wearable photoplethysmography devices. Photoplethysmography . 401–439. Brazil (2001) Resolution of the Collegiate Board (RDC) 185, of October 22, 2001. Approves the Technical Regulation contained in the annex to this Resolution, which deals with the registration, alteration, revalidation and cancellation of the registration of medical products with the National Health Surveillance Agency. Official Diary of the Union. Islam SMS, Chow CK, Daryabeygikhotbehsara R, Subedi N, Rawstorn J, Tegegne T et al (2022) Wearable cuffless blood pressure monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Digital Health 3(2):323–337. (PMID: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac021) Nelson BW, Low CA, Jacobson N, Areán P, Torous J, Allen NB (2020) Guidelines for wrist-worn consumer wearable assessment of heart rate in biobehavioral research. npj Digit Med 3(1):1–9. (PMID: 10.1038/s41746-020-0297-4) Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN et al (2005) Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Circulation 111(5):697–716. (PMID: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F615699287) Lee HY, Lee DJ, Seo J, Ihm SH, Kim KI, Cho EJ et al (2021) Smartphone/smartwatch-based cuffless blood pressure measurement: a position paper from the Korean Society of Hypertension. Clin Hypertens 27(4):1–8. Colvonen PJ (2021) Response To: Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. npj Digit Med 4:38. (PMID: 10.1038/s41746-021-00408-5336378227910598) Ware OR, Dawson JE, Shinohara MM, Taylor SC (2020) Racial limitations of fitzpatrick skin type. Cutis 105:77–80. (PMID: 32186531) Galindo GR, Mayer JA, Slymen D, Almaguer DD, Clapp E, Pichon LC et al (2007) Sun sensitivity in 5 US ethnoracial groups. Cutis 80:25. (PMID: 17725060) Pershing LK, Tirumala VP, Nelson JL, Corlett JL, Lin AG, Meyer LJ et al (2008) Reflectance spectrophotometer: the dermatologists’ sphygmomanometer for skin phototyping? J Invest Dermatol 128:1633–1640. (PMID: 10.1038/sj.jid.570123818200057) Stergiou GS, Alpert B, Mieke S, Asmar R, Atkins N, Eckert S et al (2018) A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement. J Hypertens 71(3):368–374. (PMID: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237) Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA, Dunn JP (2020) Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. npj Digit Med 3(1):1–9. (PMID: 10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6) Peake JM, Kerr G, Sullivan JP (2018) A critical review of consumer wearables, mobile applications, and equipment for providing biofeedback, monitoring stress, and sleep in physically active populations. Front Physiol 9:743. (PMID: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00743300026296031746) Colvonen PJ (2021) Response To: Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. npj Digit Med 4(1):3–4. (PMID: 10.1038/s41746-021-00408-5) Boudreaux B (2018) Validity of wearable activity monitors during cycling and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 50(3):624–633. (PMID: 10.1249/MSS.000000000000147129189666) Shin G, Jarrahi MH, Fei Y, Karami A, Gafinowitz N, Byun A et al (2019) Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: a systematic literature review. J Biomed Inform 93:103153. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.10315330910623) Malta DC, Bernal RTI, Prates EJS et al (2022) Self-reported arterial hypertension, use of health services and guidelines for care in Brazilian population: National Health Survey, 2019. Epidemiol Serv Saude 31(spe 1). Cosoli G, Spinsante S, Scalise L (2020) Wrist-worn and chest-strap wearable devices: Systematic review on accuracy and metrological characteristics. Measurement 159:107789. (PMID: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107789) Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD (2015) Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12(1). Ng KG (2011) Review of measurement methods and clinical validation studies of noninvasive blood pressure monitors: Accuracy requirements and protocol considerations for devices that require patient-specific calibration by a secondary method or device before use. Blood Press Monitor 16(6):291–303. (PMID: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32834e3c22) Peter L, Noury N, Cerny M (2014) A review of methods for non-invasive and continuous blood pressure monitoring: Pulse transit time method is promising? IRBM 35(5):271–282. (PMID: 10.1016/j.irbm.2014.07.002) Sharma M, Barbosa K, Ho V, Griggs D, Ghirmai T, Krishnan SK et al (2017) Cuff-less and continuous blood pressure monitoring: a methodological review. Technologies 5(2):21. (PMID: 10.3390/technologies5020021) Wang R (2017) Accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. JAMA Cardiol 2(1):104–106. (PMID: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.334027732703)
فهرسة مساهمة:	Keywords: Blood pressure determination; Dimensional measurement accuracy; Wearable electronic devices
تواريخ الأحداث:	Date Created: 20230705 Date Completed: 20230928 Latest Revision: 20230928
رمز التحديث:	20231215
DOI:	10.1007/s11517-023-02869-0
PMID:	37405672
قاعدة البيانات:	MEDLINE

Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag.

Full Text Finder

الوصف
تدمد:	1741-0444
DOI:	10.1007/s11517-023-02869-0