دورية أكاديمية

Natural history and clinical burden of moderate aortic stenosis: a systematic review and explorative meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Natural history and clinical burden of moderate aortic stenosis: a systematic review and explorative meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: Morelli M; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca., Galasso M; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca., Esposito G; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Soriano FS; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Nava S; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Da Pozzo C; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan., Bossi I; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Piccaluga E; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Bruschi G; Department of Cardiac Surgery., Maloberti A; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca.; 4 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy., Oliva F; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Oreglia JA; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital., Giannattasio C; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca.; 4 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy., Montalto C; Interventional Cardiology, 1 Division of Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital.
المصدر: Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) [J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)] 2023 Sep 01; Vol. 24 (9), pp. 659-665. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 26.
نوع المنشور: Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101259752 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1558-2035 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15582027 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, c2006-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Ventricular Function, Left* , Aortic Valve Stenosis*/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis*/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis*/complications, Humans ; Stroke Volume ; Prognosis ; Aortic Valve ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
مستخلص: Aims: The mortality risk of patients with moderate aortic stenosis is not well known, but recent studies suggested that it might negatively affect prognosis. We aimed to assess the natural history and clinical burden of moderate aortic stenosis and to investigate the interaction of patients' baseline characteristics with prognosis.
Methods: Systematic research was conducted on PubMed. The inclusion criteria were inclusion of patients with moderate aortic stenosis; and report of the survival at 1-year follow-up (minimum). Incidence ratios related to all-cause mortality in patients and controls of each study were estimated and then pooled using a fixed effects model. All patients with mild aortic stenosis or without aortic stenosis were considered controls. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and age on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis.
Results: Fifteen studies and 11 596 patients with moderate aortic stenosis were included. All-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with moderate aortic stenosis than in controls in all timeframes analysed (all P  < 0.0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction and sex did not significantly impact on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis ( P  = 0.4584 and P  = 0.5792), while increasing age showed a significant interaction with mortality (estimate = 0.0067; 95% confidence interval: 0.0007-0.0127; P  = 0.0323).
Conclusion: Moderate aortic stenosis is associated with reduced survival. Further studies are necessary to confirm the prognostic impact of this valvulopathy and the possible benefit of aortic valve replacement.
(Copyright © 2023 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)
References: Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:561–632.
Yadgir S, Johnson CO, Aboyans V, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of calcific aortic valve and degenerative mitral valve diseases, 1990-2017. Circulation 2020; 141:1670–1680.
Carabello BA. Introduction to aortic stenosis. Circ Res 2013; 113:179–185.
Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. the Tromsø study. Heart 2013; 99:396–400.
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:e25–197.
Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet 2009; 373:956–966.
Lester SJ, Heilbron B, Gin K, Dodek A, Jue J. The natural history and rate of progression of aortic stenosis. Chest 1998; 113:1109–1114.
Spitzer E, van Mieghem NM, Pibarot P, et al. Rationale and design of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left ventricle in patients with ADvanced heart failure (TAVR UNLOAD) trial. Am Heart J 2016; 182:80–88.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14:135.
Somes GW. The generalized Mantel–Haenszel statistic. Am Stat 1986; 40:106–108.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327:557–560.
Coisne A, Montaigne D, Aghezzaf S, et al. Association of mortality with aortic stenosis severity in outpatients. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 6:1424.
Mann TD, Loewenstein I, ben Assa E, Topilsky Y. Natural history of moderate aortic stenosis with preserved and low ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2021; 34:735–743.
Du Y, Gössl M, Garcia S, et al. Natural history observations in moderate aortic stenosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2021; 21:108.
Chew NW, Kong G, Ngiam JN, et al. Comparison of outcomes of asymptomatic moderate aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients ≥80 years versus 70-79 years versus <70 years. Am J Cardiol 2021; 157:93–100.
Jean G, van Mieghem NM, Gegenava T, et al. Moderate aortic stenosis in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:2796–2803.
Lee W, Choi W, Kang SH, et al. Long-term prognosis of mild to moderate aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e47.
Bae HJ, Hwang J, Han S, Hur SH, Chung JW, Kim H. Long term clinical outcomes in patients with moderate aortic stenosis. Heart Surg Forum 2020; 23:E358–E365.
Delesalle G, Bohbot Y, Rusinaru D, Delpierre Q, Maréchaux S, Tribouilloy C. Characteristics and prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8:e011036.
Strange G, Stewart S, Celermajer D, et al. Poor long-term survival in patients with moderate aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:1851–1863.
van Gils L, Clavel MA, Vollema EM, et al. Prognostic implications of moderate aortic stenosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:2383–2392.
Romero J, Chavez P, Goodman-Meza D, et al. Outcomes in patients with various forms of aortic stenosis including those with low-flow low-gradient normal and low ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 114:1069–1074.
Yechoor P, Blaustein AS, Bakaeen FG, et al. The natural history of moderate aortic stenosis in a veteran population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145:1550–1553.
Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, et al. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis: natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004; 25:199–205.
Iivanainen AM, Lindroos M, Tilvis R, Heikkilä J, Kupari M. Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:97–101.
Kennedy KD, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Bailey KR. Natural history of moderate aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:313–319.
Horstkotte D, Loogen F. The natural history of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: (suppl E): 57–64.
Turina J, Hess O, Sepulcri F, Krayenbuehl HP. Spontaneous course of aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J 1987; 8:471–483.
Coisne A, Scotti A, Latib A, et al. Impact of moderate aortic stenosis on long-term clinical outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:1664–1674.
Conrotto F, D’Ascenzo F, Salizzoni S, et al. A gender based analysis of predictors of all cause death after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2014; 114:1269–1274.
Ito S, Miranda WR, Nkomo VT, et al. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:1313–1321.
Haseeb ul Rasool M, Saleem M, Nadeem M, et al. The role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a feasibility analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e29522.
Samad Z, Vora AN, Dunning A, et al. Aortic valve surgery and survival in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:2276–2286.
Tarantini G, Nai Fovino L. Lifetime strategy of patients with aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:1727–1730.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230706 Date Completed: 20230823 Latest Revision: 20240201
رمز التحديث: 20240201
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10754483
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001490
PMID: 37409667
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1558-2035
DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001490