دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Understanding and preventing the advertisement and sale of illicit drugs to young people through social media: A multidisciplinary scoping review.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Understanding and preventing the advertisement and sale of illicit drugs to young people through social media: A multidisciplinary scoping review.
المؤلفون: Fuller A; Dawes Centre for Future Crime, University College London, London, UK.; Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK., Vasek M; Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK., Mariconti E; Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK., Johnson SD; Dawes Centre for Future Crime, University College London, London, UK.; Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK.
المصدر: Drug and alcohol review [Drug Alcohol Rev] 2024 Jan; Vol. 43 (1), pp. 56-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 31.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 9015440 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1465-3362 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09595236 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Drug Alcohol Rev Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Original Publication: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, U.K. : Carfax Pub. Co.,
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Illicit Drugs* , Social Media* , Drug Trafficking*, Adolescent ; Child ; Humans ; Advertising ; Commerce
مستخلص: Issues: The sale of illicit drugs online has expanded to mainstream social media apps. These platforms provide access to a wide audience, especially children and adolescents. Research is in its infancy and scattered due to the multidisciplinary aspects of the phenomena.
Approach: We present a multidisciplinary systematic scoping review on the advertisement and sale of illicit drugs to young people. Peer-reviewed studies written in English, Spanish and French were searched for the period 2015 to 2022. We extracted data on users, drugs studied, rate of posts, terminology used and study methodology.
Key Findings: A total of 56 peer-reviewed papers were included. The analysis of these highlights the variety of drugs advertised and platforms used to do so. Various methodological designs were considered. Approaches to detecting illicit content were the focus of many studies as algorithms move from detecting drug-related keywords to drug selling behaviour. We found that on average, for the studies reviewed, 13 in 100 social media posts advertise illicit drugs. However, popular platforms used by adolescents are rarely studied.
Implications: Promotional content is increasing in sophistication to appeal to young people, shifting towards healthy, glamourous and seemingly legal depictions of drugs. Greater inter-disciplinary collaboration between computational and qualitative approaches are needed to comprehensively study the sale and advertisement of illegal drugs on social media across different platforms. This requires coordinated action from researchers, policy makers and service providers.
(© 2023 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.)
References: Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Winstock AR. Use of silk road, the online drug marketplace, in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Addiction. 2014;109:774-783.
Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D. Hidden wholesale: the drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;35:7-15.
Nurmi J, Kaskela T, Perälä J, Oksanen A. Seller's reputation and capacity on the illicit drug markets: 11-month study on the Finnish version of the Silk Road. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:201-207.
Martin J, Munksgaard R, Coomber R, Demant J, Barratt MJ. Selling drugs on darkweb cryptomarkets: differentiated pathways, risks and rewards. Br J Criminol. 2020;60:559-578.
Marengo D, Angelo Fabris M, Longobardi C, Settanni M. Smartphone and social media use contributed to individual tendencies towards social media addiction in Italian adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addict Behav. 2022;126:107204.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European drug report 2021: trends and developments. [Internet]. LU: Publications Office; 2021. https://doi.org/10.2810/18539.
BBC. Teens found selling drugs on snapchat and Instagram, BBC three investigation finds. BBC News [Internet]. 2017 [cited 9 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-40601036.
Marsh S. Youth workers warn of rise in drugs purchases through social media. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017 [cited 9 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/31/youth-workers-warn-of-rise-in-drugs-purchases-through-social-media.
Howard S. ‘My son was groomed into drug dealing by gangs on snapchat’. The Telegraph [Internet]. 2018 [cited 9 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/son-groomed-drug-dealing-gangs-snapchat/.
VICE. Buying Drugs Over Snapchat | High Society [Internet]. 2020 [cited 18 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ki7d_R-t60.
Carrez R, Lopez F. Entre confinement et répression: comment les usagers de cannabis se sont organisés. Psychotropes. 2020;26:165.
United Nations. World drug report 2021 [Internet]. Vienna: United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime; 2021 [cited 15 January 2022]. Available from: www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021.html.
Branley DB, Covey J. Is exposure to online content depicting risky behavior related to viewers' own risky behavior offline? Comput Hum Behav. 2017;75:283-287.
Brunborg GS, Andreas JB, Kvaavik E. Social media use and episodic heavy drinking among adolescents. Psychol Rep. 2017;120:475-490.
AlSayyari A, AlBuhairan F. Relationship of media exposure to substance use among adolescents in Saudi Arabia: results from a national study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;191:174-180.
House of Commons. Online Safety Bill-Hansard-UK Parliament [Internet]. 121 2022. Available from: https://hansard.parliament.uk//commons/2022-07-12/debates/942C54C4-D672-492E-BAD9-195E3BB63724/OnlineSafetyBill.
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/an-introduction-to-systematic-reviews/book245742.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-473.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19-32.
Auxier B, Erson M. Social media use in 2021 [Internet]. Washington: Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech; 2021 [cited 9 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/.
Demant J, Bakken SA, Oksanen A, Gunnlaugsson H. Drug dealing on Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram: a qualitative analysis of novel drug markets in the Nordic countries. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019;38:377-385.
Moyle L, Childs A, Coomber R, Barratt MJ. #Drugsforsale: an exploration of the use of social media and encrypted messaging apps to supply and access drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;63:101-110.
Oksanen A, Miller BL, Savolainen I, Sirola A, Demant J, Kaakinen M, et al. Illicit drug purchases via social media among American young people: International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, held as part of the 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2020. In: Meiselwitz G, editor. Cham: Social Computing and Social Media; 2020. p. 278-288.
Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
Gretzel U. The visual turn in social media marketing. Tourismos. 2016;12:3.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Volume 2. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2012. p. 57-71. (APA Handbooks in Psychology).
Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. 2011 [cited 8 January 2022]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
PRISMA. PRISMA [Internet]. PRISMA Flow Diagram. 2021 [cited 3 November 2021]. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram.aspx.
McCulloch L, Furlong L. DM for details: selling drugs in the age of social media [Internet]. Volteface. 2019 [cited 19 October 2021]. Available from: https://volteface.me/publications/dm-details-selling-drugs-age-social-media/.
Rutherford BN, Sun T, Johnson B, Co S, Lim TL, Lim CCW, et al. Getting high for likes: exploring cannabis-related content on TikTok. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022;41:1119-1125.
Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014;72:39.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:196-207.
Lipsey M, Wilson D. Practical meta-analysis [Internet]. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2001 [cited 18 February 2023]. (Applied Social Research Methods Series; vol. 49). Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/practical-meta-analysis/book11092.
Schwarzer G, Rücker G. Meta-analysis of proportions. In: Evangelou E, Veroniki AA, editors. Meta-research: methods and protocols [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer US; 2022. p. 159-172. [cited 28 February 2023]. (Methods in Molecular Biology). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_10.
Meta. Detecting violations | Transparency Centre [Internet]. 2022 [cited 27 September 2022]. Available from: https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/enforcement/detecting-violations/.
Twitter transparency. Rules Enforcement-Twitter Transparency Center [Internet]. 2021 [cited 6 February 2023]. Available from: https://transparency.twitter.com/en/reports/rules-enforcement.html.
Petersen M, Petersen I, Poulsen C, Norgaard L. #studydrugs-persuasive posting on Instagram. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;95:103100.
Al-Rawi A. The fentanyl crisis & the dark side of social media. Telemat Inform. 2019;45:101280.
Demant J, Bakken SA, Hall A. Social media markets for prescription drugs: platforms as virtual mortars for drug types and dealers. Drugs Alcohol Today. 2020;20:36-49.
Jain P, Zaher Z, Mazid I. Opioids on Twitter: a content analysis of conversations regarding prescription drugs on social media and implications for message design. J Health Commun. 2020;25:74-81.
Garimella AL, Kerr B, Hyzer R, Moreno M. Hallucinogens on TikTok. J Adolesc Health. 2022;70:S96.
van der Sanden R, Wilkins C, Rychert M, Barratt MJ. The use of discord servers to buy and sell drugs. Contemp Drug Probl. 2022;49:453-477.
van der Sanden R, Wilkins C, Rychert M, Barratt MJ. ‘Choice’ of social media platform or encrypted messaging app to buy and sell illegal drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2022;108:103819.
Adams N, Artigiani EE, Wish ED. Choosing your platform for social media drug research and improving your keyword filter list. J Drug Issues. 2019;49:477-492.
Mackey TK, Kalyanam J, Katsuki T, Lanckriet G. Twitter-based detection of illegal online sale of prescription opioid. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:1910-1915.
Li J, Xu Q, Shah N, Mackey TK. A machine learning approach for the detection and characterization of illicit drug dealers on Instagram: model evaluation study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e13803.
Hu H, Phan N, Chun SA, Geller J, Vo H, Ye X, et al. An insight analysis and detection of drug-abuse risk behavior on twitter with self-taught deep learning. Comput Soc Netw. 2019;6:10.
Simpson SS, Adams N, Brugman CM, Conners TJ. Detecting novel and emerging drug terms using natural language processing: a social media corpus study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018;4:e2.
Shah N, Li J, Mackey TK. An unsupervised machine learning approach for the detection and characterization of illicit drug-dealing comments and interactions on Instagram. Subst Abus. 2022;43:273-277.
Saifuddin KM, Islam MIK, Akbas E. Drug Abuse Detection in Twitter-sphere: Graph-Based Approach. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 4136-4145.
Alruwaili W, Protano B, Sirigiriraju T, Alhoori H. Using Arabic tweets to understand drug selling behaviors. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019;164:559-564.
Hu C, Yin M, Liu B, Li X, Ye Y. Detection of illicit drug trafficking events on Instagram: a deep multimodal multilabel learning approach. Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management [Internet]. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. p. 3838-3846 [cited 19 May 2022]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08920.
Kalyanam J, Mackey T. Detection and characterization of illegal marketing and promotion of prescription drugs on Twitter. ArXiv E-Prints. 2017;1:1-5. arXiv:1712.00507.
Katsuki T, Mackey TK, Cuomo R. Establishing a link between prescription drug abuse and illicit online pharmacies: analysis of Twitter data. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e280.
Balsamo D, Bajardi P, Panisson A. Firsthand opiates abuse on social media: monitoring geospatial patterns of interest through a digital cohort. The world wide web conference [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 2572-2579. (WWW '19). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313634.
Hu C, Yin M, Liu B, Li X, Ye Y. Identifying illicit drug dealers on Instagram with large-scale multimodal data fusion. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2021;12:1-23.
Ding T, Roy A, Chen Z, Zhu Q, Pan S. Analyzing and retrieving illicit drug-related posts from social media. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1555-1560.
Phan N, Chun SA, Bhole M, Geller J. Enabling Real-Time Drug Abuse Detection in Tweets. 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 1510-1514.
Tian Q, Lagisetty J, Li B. Finding needles of interested tweets in the haystack of Twitter network. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 447-452.
Cortés VD, Velásquez JD, Ibáñez CF. Twitter for Marijuana Infodemiology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 730-736. (WI '17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106541.
Hu H, Moturu P, Dharan K, Geller J, Iorio S, Phan H, et al. Deep learning model for classifying drug abuse risk behavior in tweets. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 386-387.
Ginart A, Das S, Harris JK, Wong R, Yan H, Krauss M, et al. Drugs or Dancing? Using Real-Time Machine Learning to Classify Streamed “Dabbing” Homograph Tweets. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 10-13.
Paul Rupa A, Gangopadhyay A. Multi-modal deep learning based fusion approach to detect illicit retail networks from social media. 2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 238-243.
Roy A, Paul A, Pirsiavash H, Pan S. Automated detection of substance use-related social media posts based on image and text analysis. IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). Baltimore, MD: IEEE; 2017. p. 772-9.
Yang X, Luo J. Tracking illicit drug dealing and abuse on Instagram using multimodal analysis. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol [Internet]. 2017;8:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3011871.
Kalyanam J, Mackey TK. A review of digital surveillance methods and approaches to combat prescription drug abuse. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4:397-409.
Sarker A, DeRoos A, Perrone J. Mining social media for prescription medication abuse monitoring: a review and proposal for a data-centric framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:315-329.
Halevy A, Canton Ferrer C, Ma H, Ozertem U, Pantel P, Saeidi M, et al. Preserving integrity in online social networks. Communications of the ACM. 2020;65:92-98 arXiv:2009.10311.
Kalyanam J, Katsuki T, Lanckriet GRG, Mackey TK. Exploring trends of nonmedical use of prescription drugs and polydrug abuse in the Twittersphere using unsupervised machine learning. Addict Behav. 2017;65:289-295.
Sequeira R, Gayen A, Ganguly N, Dandapat SK, Chandra J. A large-scale study of the Twitter follower network to characterize the spread of prescription drug abuse tweets. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2019;6:1232-1244.
Zhou Y, Sani N, Luo J. Fine-grained mining of illicit drug use patterns using social multimedia data from Instagram. ArXiv161108351 Cs [Internet]. 24 November 2016 [cited 27 October 2021]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08351.
Li M, Kakani N, Li C, Park A. Understanding cannabis information on social media: examining tweets from verified, regular, and suspended users. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1-10.
Majmundar A, Allem J, Cruz T, Unger J, Pentz M. Twitter surveillance at the intersection of the triangulum. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24:118-124.
Hammond AS, Paul MJ, Hobelmann J, Koratana AR, Dredze M, Chisolm MS. Perceived attitudes about substance use in anonymous social media posts near college campuses: observational study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5:e52.
Montero-Dominguez F, Cruz-Juarez A, Tiburcio-Sainz M, Garcia-Gonzalez J. High school student's perception of contents related to alcohol and marijuana consumption on social networks. Cienciauat. 2018;13:50-64.
Tan RKJ, Wong CM, Chen MIC, Chan YY, Bin Ibrahim MA, Lim OZ, et al. Chemsex among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Singapore and the challenges ahead: a qualitative study. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;61:31-37.
Bakken S, Demant J. Sellers' risk perceptions in public and private social media drug markets. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;73:255-262.
Adejoh SO, Adisa WB, Onome O, Anyimukwu C, Olorunlana A. The influence of social media on illicit drug sale and use among undergraduates in Lagos, Nigeria. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 2020;64:20-40.
Kurcevic E, Lines R. New psychoactive substances in Eurasia: a qualitative study of people who use drugs and harm reduction services in six countries. Harm Reduct J. 2020;17:94.
Oksanen A, Miller BL, Savolainen I, Sirola A, Demant J, Kaakinen M, et al. Social media and access to drugs online: a nationwide study in the United States and Spain among adolescents and young adults. Eur J Psychol Appl Leg Context. 2021;13:29-36.
Sullivan T, Voce A. Use of mobile phones to buy and sell illicitdrugs [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2020 [cited 19 August 2022]. Available from: https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/sb/sb22.
Moureaud C, Hertig J, Dong Y, Muraro IS, Alhabash S. Purchase of prescription medicines via social media: a survey-based study of prevalence, risk perceptions, and motivations. Health Policy. 2021;125:1421-1429.
van der Sanden R, Wilkins C, Romeo JS, Rychert M, Barratt MJ. Predictors of using social media to purchase drugs in New Zealand: findings from a large-scale online survey. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;98:103430.
Bakken S, Harder S. From dealing to influencing: online marketing of cannabis on Instagram. Crime Media Cult. 2022;19:135-157.
Al-Rawi A. The convergence of social media and other communication technologies in the promotion of illicit and controlled drugs. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022;44:e13-e160.
Dunn HK, Pearlman DN, Beatty A, Florin P. Psychosocial determinants of teens' online engagement in drug prevention social media campaigns: implications for public health organizations. J Prim Prev. 2018;39:469-481.
Moreno EFC, Salazar GKC. Development of an application for parental control of WhatsApp on android mobile devices. 2019 p. 16-23. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078184624&doi=10.1109%2fICI2ST.2019.00010&partnerID=40&md5=feb16ab85d10ad3d54ed5df278465828.
Evans W, Andrade E, Pratt M, Mottern A, Chavez S, Calzetta-Raymond A, et al. Peer-to-peer social media as an effective prevention strategy: quasi-experimental evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e16207.
Moeller K, Munksgaard R, Demant J. Illicit drug prices and quantity discounts: a comparison between a cryptomarket, social media, and police data. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;91:102969.
Bancroft A. Potential influences of the darknet on illicit drug diffusion. Curr Addict Rep. 2022;9:671-676.
May T, Hough M. Drug markets and distribution systems. Addict Res Theory. 2004;12:549-563.
Sandberg S. The importance of culture for cannabis markets: towards an economic sociology of illegal drug markets. Br J Criminol. 2012;52:1133-1151.
Snapchat. Snapchat-The fastest way to share a moment! [Internet]. 2022 [cited 13 September 2022]. Available from: https://www.snapchat.com/.
Moeller K. Hybrid governance in online drug distribution. Contemp Drug Probl. 2022;49:491-504.
Davis A. Preventing child exploitation on our apps [Internet]. Meta. 2021 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://about.fb.com/news/2021/02/preventing-child-exploitation-on-our-apps/.
Rideout V, Robb MB. Social media, social life: teens reveal their experiences [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2018. p. 32 Available from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/2018-social-media-social-life-executive-summary-web.pdf.
Vogels EA, Gelles-Watnick R, Massarat N. Teens, social media and technology 2022 [Internet]. Washington: Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech; 2022 [cited 25 September 2022]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/.
Fleetwood J, Aldridge J, Chatwin C. Gendering research on online illegal drug markets. Addict Res Theory. 2020;28:457-466.
Giletta M, Choukas-Bradley S, Maes M, Linthicum KP, Card NA, Prinstein MJ. A meta-analysis of longitudinal peer influence effects in childhood and adolescence. Psychol Bull. 2021;147:719-747.
Meta. Family Centre | Meta [Internet]. 2022 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://familycenter.instagram.com/.
Instagram. Can I limit sensitive content that I see on Instagram? | Instagram Help Center [Internet]. 2022 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://help.instagram.com/251027992727268.
Statista Research Department. Views per post of global TikTok influencers [Internet]. Statista. 2023 [cited 9 February 2023]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251210/views-per-post-tiktok-influencers-worldwide/.
European monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Europol. EU Drug Markets Report 2019 [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/eu-drug-markets_en.
Guarita B, Belackova V, van der Gouwe D, Blankers M, Pazitny M, Griffiths P. Monitoring drug trends in the digital environment-new methods, challenges and the opportunities provided by automated approaches. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;94:103210.
Belackova V, Pazitny M, Drapalova E, Martinez M, van der Gouwe D, Begley E, et al. Assessing the impact of laws controlling the online availability of 25I-NBOMe, AH-7921, MDPV and MXE - outcomes of a semi-automated e-shop monitoring. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2018;25:109-117.
Winter C, Gundur RV. Challenges in gaining ethical approval for sensitive digital social science studies. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2022;1-16.
Thomas DR, Pastrana S, Hutchings A, Clayton R, Beresford AR. Ethical issues in research using datasets of illicit origin. Proceedings of the 2017 internet measurement conference [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 445-462. (IMC '17) [cited 29 September 2022]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131365.3131389.
Golder S, Ahmed S, Norman G, Booth A. Attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e7082.
Gundur RV, Berry M, Taodang D. Using digital open source and crowdsourced data in studies of deviance and crime. In: Lavorgna A, Holt TJ, editors. Researching cybercrimes: methodologies, ethics, and critical approaches [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 8 February 2023]. p. 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_8.
Tiidenberg K. Ethics in digital research. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection [Internet]. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. p. 466-479 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-data-collection/i3094.xml.
Gold N. Using Twitter data in research guidance for researchers and ethics reviewers [Internet]. London: UCL Computer Science Ethics Committee; 2020 Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/data-protection/sites/data-protection/files/using-twitter-research-v1.0.pdf.
Ravn S, Barnwell A, Barbosa NB. What is “publicly available data”? Exploring blurred public-private boundaries and ethical practices through a case study on Instagram. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020;15:40-45.
Borodovsky JT, Lee DC, Crosier BS, Gabrielli JL, Sargent JD, Budney AJ. U.S. cannabis legalization and use of vaping and edible products among youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:299-306.
Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Sehi A, Spitznagel EL, Berg CJ, Bierut LJ, et al. Marijuana advertising exposure among current marijuana users in the U.S. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;174:192-200.
Kemp S. The global state of digital in July 2022 [Internet]. DataReportal-Global Digital Insights. 2022 [cited 26 September 2022]. Available from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-july-global-statshot.
Romer D, Moreno M. Digital media and risks for adolescent substance abuse and problematic gambling. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Suppl 2):S102-S106.
Moreno MA, Whitehill JM. Influence of social media on alcohol use in adolescents and young adults. Alcohol Res. 2014;36:91-100.
Sidebottom A, Tilley N. EMMIE and the what works Centre for Crime Reduction: Progress, challenges, and future directions for evidence-based policing and crime reduction in the United Kingdom. The globalization of evidence-based policing. Abingdon: Routledge; 2021.
College of Policing. What Works Centre for Crime Reduction [Internet]. What Works Centre for Crime Reduction. 2022 [cited 28 September 2022]. Available from: https://www.college.police.uk/research/what-works-centre-crime-reduction.
Snapchat. Snap Inc. Transparency Report [Internet]. 2022 [cited 27 September 2022]. Available from: https://snap.com/en-GB/privacy/transparency.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: adolescent; harm reduction; illicit drugs; scoping review; social media
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Illicit Drugs)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230731 Date Completed: 20240131 Latest Revision: 20240131
رمز التحديث: 20240131
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13716
PMID: 37523310
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1465-3362
DOI:10.1111/dar.13716