دورية أكاديمية

Evisceration with implantation of an intrascleral silicone prosthesis in dogs: A retrospective study of 107 cases (2010-2019).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evisceration with implantation of an intrascleral silicone prosthesis in dogs: A retrospective study of 107 cases (2010-2019).
المؤلفون: Barbry JB; Centre Hopsitalier Onlyvet, St Priest, France., Poinsard AS; Anicura Lorrainevet, Ludres, France., Cappelle J; UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Univ Montpellier France, Montpellier, France., Balland O; Anicura Lorrainevet, Ludres, France., Isard PF; Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Saint Martin, Saint-Martin Bellevue, France., Dulaurent T; Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Saint Martin, Saint-Martin Bellevue, France.
المصدر: Veterinary ophthalmology [Vet Ophthalmol] 2024 Jan; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 61-69. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 04.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100887377 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1463-5224 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14635216 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Vet Ophthalmol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Osney Mead, Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science, c1998-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca*/veterinary , Dog Diseases*/surgery, Humans ; Dogs ; Animals ; Retrospective Studies ; Silicones ; Ulcer/veterinary ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/veterinary ; Prostheses and Implants
مستخلص: Objective: To retrospectively analyze the preoperative clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of evisceration with implantation of an intrascleral silicone prosthesis (EIISP) procedures in dogs and evaluate whether brachycephalic dogs are more prone than non-brachycephalic dogs to develop postoperative complications after EIISP.
Animal Studied: Ninety-One dogs (19 of which were brachycephalic) were included.
Procedures: Medical records from 2010 to 2019 were reviewed. Signalment, reason for EIISP, postoperative complications, follow-up time, and postoperative eye appearance were analyzed.
Results: The most frequently represented breeds were French Bulldog [11/91 (12%) dogs], Jack Russell Terrier [6/91 (7%)], and Shih Tzu [6/91 (7%)]. Brachycephalic dogs were statistically younger than non-brachycephalic dogs at the time of EIISP (p = 1.61 × 10 -5 ). Uncontrolled glaucoma was the most common reason for EIISP in both groups. Short-term complications (from D0 to D15) seen in 7/91 (8%) dogs included epithelial corneal ulcers (n = 3), keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) (n = 2), and prosthesis extrusion (n = 2). Long-term complications seen in 26/91 (29%) dogs included KCS (n = 11), epithelial corneal ulcers (n = 7), stromal ulcers (n = 3), entropion (n = 4), and prosthesis extrusion (n = 1). Extrusion of the prosthesis occurred twice in eyes that had undergone diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. The risk of postoperative complications was not significantly different between brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic dogs (p = .3).
Conclusions: Brachycephalic status in dogs does not appear to influence the risk of complications from EIISP. Nevertheless, the present study is a reminder that EIISP focuses on esthetics, and considering the possible complications associated with it, it does not provide a benefit to the patient compared to enucleation.
(© 2023 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.)
References: Gelatt KN, Whitley RD. Surgery of the orbit. In: Gelatt KN, Gelatt JP, eds. Veterinary Ophthalmic Surgery. 1st ed. Saunders Ltd.; 2011:51-88.
Ramsey DT, Fox DB. Surgery of the orbit. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1997;27:1215-1264.
Hamor RE, Roberts SM, Severin GA. Use of orbital implants after enucleation in dogs, horses, and cats: 161 cases (1980-1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993;203:701-706.
Nasisse MP, van Ee RT, Munger RJ, et al. Use of methyl methacrylate orbital prostheses in dogs and cats: 78 cases (1980-1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988;192:539-542.
Palmer SV, Velloso Ramos R, Woodoff-Leith ED, Rodriguez Galarza RM. Causes, outcomes, and owner satisfaction of dogs undergoing enucleation with orbital implant placement. Vet Ophthalmol. 2021;24:346-353.
Scagliotti R, MacMillan A, Danz W. The application of ocular prosthetics in veterinary medicine, part one. Today Ocul. 1978;8:23-25.
Gilger BC, Pizzirani S, Johnston LC, Urdiales NR. Use of a hydroxyapatite orbital implant in a cosmetic corneoscleral prosthesis after enucleation in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:343-345.
Brightman AH, Magrane WG, Huff RW, et al. Intraocular prosthesis in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1977;18:481-485.
Vestre W, Brightman AH, Helper L. Use of an intraocular prosthesis in the cat. Feline Pract. 1978;8:23-26.
Koch SA. Intraocular prosthesis in the dog and cat: the failures. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1981;179:883-885.
Whitley RD, Albert RA. Intraocular silicone prosthesis in the dog. Auburn Vet. 1982;38:16-21.
Whitley RD, Shaffer KW, Albert RA. Implantation of intraocular silicone prostheses in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1985;7:802-811.
Meek LA. Intraocular silicone prosthesis in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988;193:343-345.
McLaughlin SA, Ramsey DT, Lindley DM, et al. Evisceration and implantation of intrascleral prosthesis. In: Bojrad M, ed. Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. 3rd ed. Lea & Febiger Publishing; 1990:117-119.
Hamor RE, Roberts SM, Severin GA, Trawnik WR, Johnson WJ. Ocular cosmetic and prosthetic devices. Vet Clin North Am Large Pract. 1992;8:637-653.
Romkes G, Eule JC. Followup of a dog with an intraocular silicone prosthesis combined with an extraocular glass prosthesis. Case Rep Vet Med. 2012;4:1-6.
Dutton J. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophtalmologie. 1991;98:370-377.
Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P, et al. Lack of complications of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in 250 consecutive cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1993;91:177-189.
Hamor RE, Whitley RD, McLaughlin SA, et al. Intraocular silicone prostheses in dogs: a review of the literature and 50 new cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1994;30:66-69.
Riggs C, Whitley RD. Intraocular silicone prostheses in a dog and a horse with corneal lacerations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990;196:617-619.
McLaughlin SA, Ramsey DT, Lindley DM, et al. Intraocular silicone prosthesis implantation in eyes of dogs and a cat with intraocular neoplasia: nine cases (1983-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995;207:1441-1443.
Ruoss E, Spiess BM, Rühli MB, Bolliger J. Intrascleral silicone prosthesis in the dog: a retrospective study of 22 cases. Tierärztl Prax. 1997;25:164-169.
Lin CT, Hu CK, Liu CH, et al. Surgical outcome and ocular complications of evisceration and intraocular prosthesis implantation in dogs with end stage glaucoma: a review of 20 cases. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69:847-850.
Balland O, Poinsard AS. Postoperative complications of evisceration and intraocular silicone prosthesis implantation in dogs and cats: retrospective study of 35 cases. Revue Méd Vét. 2015;166:325-331.
Ionascu I, Argaseala A, Uzun S, et al. Intrascleral prosthesis in kitten as an option for eyeball enucleation. Sci Works Ser C Vet Med. 2020;66:36-42.
Provost PJ, Ortenburger AI, Caron JP. Silicone ocular prosthesis in horses: 11 cases (1983-1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989;194:1764-1766.
Wilkie D, Gilger DC, Van der Woerdt A, et al. Die Implantation von intraokulären silikonprothesen. Prakt Tierarzt. 1994;12:1097-1100.
Tóth J, Huthmann S, Dikker L. Intrascleral ocular prosthesis following evisceration in thirteen horses. Pferdeheilkunde. 2014;30:153-160.
Graham JE, Larocca RD, McLaughlin SA. Implantation of an intraocular silicone prosthesis in a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). J Avian Med Surg. 1999;13:98-103.
Sandmeyer LS, Breaux CB, McRuer DL, et al. Case report: a new technique for intraocular prosthesis implantation in a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). J Exot Pet Med. 2007;16:95-100.
O'Neill DG, Lee MM, Brodbelt DC, et al. Corneal ulcerative disease in dogs under primary veterinary care in England: epidemiology and clinical management. Canine Genet Epidemiol. 2017;15:4-5.
Barrett PM, Scagliotti RH, Merideth RE, et al. Absolute corneal sensitivity and corneal trigeminal nerve anatomy in normal dogs. Prog Vet Comp Ophthalmol. 1991;1:245-254.
O'Neill DG, Brodbelt DC, Keddy A, Church DB, Sanchez RF. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca in dogs under primary veterinary care in the UK: an epidemiological study. J Small Anim Pract. 2021;62:636-645.
Gelatt KN, MacKay EO. Prevalence of the breed-related glaucomas in pure-bred dogs in North America. Vet Ophthalmol. 2004;7:97-111.
Strom AR, Hässig M, Iburg TM, Spiess BM. Epidemiology of canine glaucoma presented to University of Zurich from 1995 to 2009. Part 1: congenital and primary glaucoma (4 and 123 cases). Vet Ophthalmol. 2011;14:121-126.
Dietrich UM, Pristnall SL, Ludwig E, et al. Primary glaucoma in the French bulldog (G16). Abstracts: the 52nd annual scientific meeting of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists, Indianapolis, IN sept 29-oct 2, 2021. Vet Ophthalmol. 2021;24:E1.
Blocker T, Hoffman A, Schaeffer DJ, Wallin JA. Corneal sensitivity and aqueous tear production in dogs undergoing evisceration with intraocular prosthesis placement. Vet Ophthalmol. 2007;10:147-154.
Nadelstein B, Wilcock B, Cook C, et al. Clinical and histologic effects of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation on the normal canine eye. Vet Comp Ophthalmol. 1997;7:155-162.
Naranjo C, Dubielzig RR. Histopathological study of the causes for failure of intrascleral prostheses in dogs and cats. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17:343-350.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: brachycephalic; complication; corneal ulcer; eye; prosthesis extrusion; surgery
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Silicones)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230804 Date Completed: 20240131 Latest Revision: 20240131
رمز التحديث: 20240131
DOI: 10.1111/vop.13139
PMID: 37540058
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1463-5224
DOI:10.1111/vop.13139