دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

How does day-to-day stress appraisal relate to coping among office workers in academia? An ecological momentary assessment study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: How does day-to-day stress appraisal relate to coping among office workers in academia? An ecological momentary assessment study.
المؤلفون: Hulin S; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Bolliger L; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Lukan J; Department of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia., Caluwaerts A; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., De Neve R; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Luštrek M; Department of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia., De Bacquer D; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Clays E; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
المصدر: Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress [Stress Health] 2024 Jun; Vol. 40 (3), pp. e3315. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 19.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101089166 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-2998 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15323005 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Stress Health Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Chichester, West Sussex, UK : John Wiley & Sons, c2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Adaptation, Psychological* , Ecological Momentary Assessment* , Occupational Stress*/psychology , Social Support*, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Belgium ; Middle Aged ; Slovenia ; Universities ; Academia
مستخلص: Existing literature indicates that academic staff experience increasing levels of work stress. This study investigated associations between day-to-day threat and challenge appraisal and day-to-day problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, and seeking social support among academic office workers. This study is based on an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) design with a 15-working day data collection period utilising our self-developed STRAW smartphone application. A total of 55 office workers from academic institutions in Belgium (n = 29) and Slovenia (n = 26) were included and 3665 item measurements were analysed. Participants were asked approximately every 90 min about their appraisal of stressful events (experienced during the working day) and their coping styles. For data analysis, we used an unstructured covariance matrix in our linear mixed models. Challenge appraisal predicted problem-focused coping and threat appraisal predicted emotion-focused coping. Our findings suggest an association between threat appraisal as well as challenge appraisal and seeking social support. Younger and female workers chose social support more often as a coping style. While working from home, participants were less likely to seek social support. The findings of our EMA study confirm previous research on the relationship between stress appraisal and coping with stress. Participants reported seeking social support less while working from home compared to working at the office, making the work location an aspect that deserves further research.
(© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Aczel, B., Kovacs, M., Van Der Lippe, T., & Szaszi, B. (2021). Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges. PLoS One, 16(3), e0249127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249127.
Adriaenssens, L., de Prins, P., & Vloeberghs, D. (2006). Werkbeleving en werkstress bij academici: Behoefte aan meer of beter HRM? Tijdschrift Voor HRM/Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Personeelsbeleid.‐Deventer, 4, 87–111.
Alberdi, A., Aztiria, A., & Basarab, A. (2016). Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 59, 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.007.
Anshel, M. H., Jamieson, J., & Raviv, S. (2001). Cognitive appraisals and coping strategies following acute stress among skilled competitive male and female athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(2), 128.
Avsec, A., Novak, M., & Bajec, B. (2012). Differential relationship of coping styles with well‐being and ill‐being of professional firemen. Psihologija, 45(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.2298/psi1201059a.
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job demands–resources theory and self‐regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695.
Bennett, A. A., Lanivich, S. E., Moeini Gharagozloo, M. M., & Akbulut, Y. (2021). Appraisals matter: Relationships between entrepreneurs' stress appraisals and venture‐based outcomes. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(4), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR‐03‐2020‐0133.
Bolliger, L., Lukan, J., Luštrek, M., de Bacquer, D., & Clays, E. (2020). Protocol of the STRess at Work (STRAW) project: How to disentangle day‐to‐day occupational stress among academics based on EMA, physiological data, and smartphone sensor and usage data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238835.
Calnan, M., Wadsworth, E., May, M., Smith, A., & Wainwright, D. (2004). Job strain, effort‐reward imbalance, and stress at work: Competing or complementary models? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940310001668.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.56.2.267.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. v., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self‐reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021‐9010.85.1.65.
Christie, M. D., & Shultz, K. S. (1998). Gender differences on coping with job stress and organizational outcomes. Work & Stress, 12(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256872.
Chu, A. H., Koh, D., Moy, F. M., & Müller‐Riemenschneider, F. (2014). Do workplace physical activity interventions improve mental health outcomes? Occupational Medicine, 64(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu045.
Cox, T., Griffiths, A., & Rial‐Gonzalez, E. (2000). Work‐related stress. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Darabi, M., Macaskill, A., & Reidy, L. (2017). A qualitative study of the UK academic role: Positive features, negative aspects and associated stressors in a mainly teaching‐focused university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(4), 566‒580–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1159287.
Du Plessis, M. (2020). Model of coping with occupational stress of academics in a South African higher education institution. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 46(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1714.
Du Plessis, M., & Martins, N. (2019). Developing a measurement instrument for coping with occupational stress in academia. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45. Article a1653. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1653.
Durak, M. (2007). The relationship between cognitive appraisal of stress, coping strategies and psychological distress among correctional officers: Personal and environmental factors.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle‐aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136617.
Fortes‐Ferreira, L., Peiro, J. M., Gonzalez‐Morales, M. G., & Martin, I. (2006). Work‐related stress and well‐being: The roles of direct action coping and palliative coping. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9450.2006.00519.x.
Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M. H. W. A., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress, 15(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370117944.
Jang, M. H., Gu, S. Y., & Jeong, Y. M. (2019). Role of coping styles in the relationship between nurses’ work stress and well‐being across career. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(6), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12523.
Kerr, J. I., Naegelin, M., Weibel, R. P., Ferrario, A., la Marca, R., von Wangenheim, F., Hoelscher, C., & Schinazi, V. R. (2020). The effects of acute work stress and appraisal on psychobiological stress responses in a group office environment. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 121, 104837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104837.
Kersh, R. (2018). Woman in higher education: Exploring stressful workplace factors and coping strategies. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11(1), 56‒73–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1372295.
Kinman, G. (1998). Pressure points: A survey into the causes and consequences of occupational stress in UK academic and related staff. Association of University Teachers.
Kinman, G. (2001). Pressure points: A review of research on stressors and strains in UK academics. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120090849.
Kirtley, O. J., Lafit, G., Achterhof, R., Hiekkaranta, A. P., & Myin‐Germeys, I. (2021). Making the black box transparent: A template and tutorial for registration of studies using experience‐sampling methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920924686.
Kleijn, W. C., van Heck, G. L., & van Waning, A. (2000). Ervaringen met een Nederlandse bewerking van de COPE copingvragenlijst. Gedrag and Gezondheid: Tijdschrift voor Psychologie and Gezondheid, 28(4), 213–226.
Kuppens, P., Champagne, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2012). The dynamic interplay between appraisal and core affect in daily life [original research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00380.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V082.I13.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
LePine, M. A. (2022). The challenge‐hindrance stressor framework: An integrative conceptual review and path forward. Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 223–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221079970.
Lukan, J., Bolliger, L., Clays, E., Mayora, O., Osmani, V., & Luštrek, M. (2021). Participants’ experience and adherence in repeated measurement studies among office‐based workers. In Adjunct proceedings of the 2021 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and proceedings of the 2021 ACM international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 528–531). https://doi.org/10.1145/3460418.3479367.
Lukan, J., Kastrašnik, M., Bolliger, L., Clays, E., & Luštrek, M. (2020). STRAW application for collecting context data and ecological momentary assessment. Proceedings of the 23rd International Multiconference on Artificial Intelligence, 63–66.
Mark, G., & Smith, A. P. (2012). Effects of occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and attributional style on the mental health and job satisfaction of university employees. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.548088.
Opstrup, N., & Pihl‐Thingvad, S. (2016). Stressing academia? Stress‐as‐offence‐to‐self at Danish universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1126895.
Peacock, E. J., & Wong, P. T. P. (1990). The stress appraisal measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine, 6(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2460060308.
Rodrigues, S., Kaiseler, M., Queirós, C., & Basto‐Pereira, M. (2017). Daily stress and coping among emergency response officers: A case study. International Journal of Emergency Services, 6(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES‐10‐2016‐0019.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Scherer, R. F., Drumheller, P. M., & Owen, C. L. (1993). Evaluating differences in cognitive appraisal and coping over stages of a transaction. Journal of Psychology, 127(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9915579.
Siegrist, J., & Rödel, A. (2006). Work stress and health risk behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(6), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1052.
Socastro, A., Everaert, J., Boemo, T., Blanco, I., Rodríguez‐Carvajal, R., & Sanchez‐Lopez, A. (2022). Moment‐to‐Moment interplay among stress appraisals and emotion regulation flexibility in daily life. Affective Science, 3(3), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761‐022‐00122‐9.
Tejero, L. M. S., Seva, R. R., & Fadrilan‐Camacho, V. F. F. (2021). Factors associated with work‐life balance and productivity before and during work from home. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(12), 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002377.
Torkelson, E., & Muhonen, T. (2004). The role of gender and job level in coping with occupational stress. Work & Stress, 18(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370412331323915.
Trouillet, R., Doan‐Van‐Hay, L. M., Launay, M., & Martin, S. (2011). Impact of age, and cognitive and coping resources on coping. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 30(4), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000456.
Troy, A. S. (2015). Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e123. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x1400171x.
van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand‐control (‐Support) model and psychological well‐being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13(2), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296084.
von Elm, E., Altman, D., Egger, M., Pocock, S., Gøtzsche, P., Vandenbroucke, J., Initiative, S., & Schlesselman, J. J. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Medicine, 4(10), e297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ng, T. W. H., & Lam, S. S. K. (2019). Promotion‐ and prevention‐focused coping: A meta‐analytic examination of regulatory strategies in the work stress process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), 1296–1323. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000404.
معلومات مُعتمدة: G.0318.18N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; N2-0081 Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: academic setting; coping; day‐to‐day work stress; ecological momentary assessment (EMA); office workers; stress appraisal
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230919 Date Completed: 20240611 Latest Revision: 20240611
رمز التحديث: 20240611
DOI: 10.1002/smi.3315
PMID: 37724331
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1532-2998
DOI:10.1002/smi.3315