دورية أكاديمية

The Importance of Incorporating Proportional Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrections Relative to Regional and Global Alignment: Steps Toward Development of a Cervical-Specific Score.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Importance of Incorporating Proportional Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrections Relative to Regional and Global Alignment: Steps Toward Development of a Cervical-Specific Score.
المؤلفون: Passias PG; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Williamson TK; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Pierce KE; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Schoenfeld AJ; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA., Krol O; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Imbo B; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Joujon-Roche R; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Tretiakov P; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Ahmad S; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Bennett-Caso C; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Mir J; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Dave P; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., McFarland K; Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY., Owusu-Sarpong S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY., Lebovic JA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY., Janjua MB; Department of Neurotrauma, Neuro-oncology, and Spine, Mercy Health, Chicago, IL., de la Garza-Ramos R; Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY., Vira S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX., Diebo B; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY., Koller H; International Center for Spinal Disorders and Deformity, Orthopedic Department II, Asklepios Clinics Bad Abbach, Bad Tölz, Germany., Protopsaltis TS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY., Lafage R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY., Lafage V; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY.
المصدر: Spine [Spine (Phila Pa 1976)] 2024 Jan 15; Vol. 49 (2), pp. 116-127. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 05.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7610646 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1528-1159 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03622436 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Hagerstown, Md., Medical Dept., Harper & Row.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Lordosis*/diagnostic imaging , Lordosis*/surgery , Kyphosis*/surgery, Adult ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Neck ; Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging ; Cervical Vertebrae/surgery
مستخلص: Study Design/setting: Retrospective single-center study.
Background: The global alignment and proportion score is widely used in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, it is not specific to the parameters used in adult cervical deformity (ACD).
Purpose: Create a cervicothoracic alignment and proportion (CAP) score in patients with operative ACD.
Methods: Patients with ACD with 2-year data were included. Parameters consisted of relative McGregor's Slope [RMGS = (MGS × 1.5)/0.9], relative cervical lordosis [RCL = CL - thoracic kyphosis (TK)], Cervical Lordosis Distribution Index (CLDI = C2 - Apex × 100/C2 - T2), relative pelvic version (RPV = sacral slope - pelvic incidence × 0.59 + 9), and a frailty factor (greater than 0.33). Cutoff points were chosen where the cross-tabulation of parameter subgroups reached a maximal rate of meeting the Optimal Outcome. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting Good Clinical Outcome criteria without the occurrence of distal junctional failure (DJF) or reoperation. CAP was scored between 0 and 13 and categorized accordingly: ≤3 (proportioned), 4-6 (moderately disproportioned), >6 (severely disproportioned). Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined the relationship between CAP categories, overall score, and development of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), DJF, reoperation, and Optimal Outcome by 2 years.
Results: One hundred five patients with operative ACD were included. Assessment of the 3-month CAP score found a mean of 5.2/13 possible points. 22.7% of patients were proportioned, 49.5% moderately disproportioned, and 27.8% severely disproportioned. DJK occurred in 34.5% and DJF in 8.7%, 20.0% underwent reoperation, and 55.7% achieved Optimal Outcome. Patients severely disproportioned in CAP had higher odds of DJK [OR: 6.0 (2.1-17.7); P =0.001], DJF [OR: 9.7 (1.8-51.8); P =0.008], reoperation [OR: 3.3 (1.9-10.6); P =0.011], and lower odds of meeting the optimal outcome [OR: 0.3 (0.1-0.7); P =0.007] by 2 years, while proportioned patients suffered zero occurrences of DJK or DJF.
Conclusion: The regional alignment and proportion score is a method of analyzing the cervical spine relative to global alignment and demonstrates the importance of maintaining horizontal gaze, while also matching overall cervical and thoracolumbar alignment to limit complications and maximize clinical improvement.
Competing Interests: P.G.P.: Allosource: other financial or material support; Cervical Scoliosis Research Society: research support; Globus Medical: paid presenter or speaker; Medicrea: paid consultant; Royal Biologics: paid consultant; SpineWave: paid consultant; Terumo: paid consultant; Zimmer: paid presenter or speaker. R.L.: Nemaris: stock or stock options. V.L.: DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: paid presenter or speaker; European Spine Journal : editorial or governing board; Globus Medical: paid consultant; International Spine Study Group: board or committee member; Nuvasive: IP royalties; Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member; The Permanente Medical Group: paid presenter or speaker. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
References: Chi JH, Tay B, Stahl D, et al. Complex deformities of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2007;18:295–304.
Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF. The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:669–678.
Smith JS, Line B, Bess S, et al. The health impact of adult cervical deformity in patients presenting for surgical treatment: comparison to United States population norms and chronic disease states based on the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:716–725.
Riew KD. Cervical deformity assessment and correction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:S29.
Tan LA, Riew KD, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine deformity—part 1: biomechanics, radiographic parameters, and classification. Neurosurgery. 2017;81:197–203.
Leven D, Cho SK. Pseudarthrosis of the cervical spine: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:776–786.
Koller H, Ames C, Mehdian H, et al. Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:324–344.
Passias PG, Bortz CA, Segreto FA, et al. Development of a modified cervical deformity frailty index: a streamlined clinical tool for preoperative risk stratification. Spine (Phila Pa, 1976 2019;44:169–176.
Berjano P, Damilano M, Pejrona M, et al. Revision surgery in distal junctional kyphosis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:86–102.
Passias PG, Horn SR, Oh C, et al. Predicting the occurrence of postoperative distal junctional kyphosis in cervical deformity patients. Neurosurgery. 2020;86:E38–E46.
Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, et al. Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1661–1672.
Kwan KYH, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al; AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity. Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:312–320.
Hyun S-J, Han S, Kim K-J, et al. Assessment of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis criteria of a cervical spine deformity classification system using long-term follow-up data after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown, Md). 2019;16:20–26.
Passfall L, Williamson TK, Krol O, et al. Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity? J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37:1–8.
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson T, et al. “Reverse roussouly”: cervicothoracic curvature ratios define characteristic shapes in adult cervical deformity. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:1448–1456.
Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, et al. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:982–991.
Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;89:218–227.
O’Brien MF, Kuklo TRTR, Blanke KM, et al. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek; 2005 http://www.oref.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/sdsg-radiographic-measuremnt-manual.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Lafage R, Smith JS, Soroceanu A, et al; International Spine Study Group (ISSG). Predicting mechanical failure following cervical deformity surgery: a composite score integrating age-adjusted cervical alignment targets. Global Spine J. 2022;13:2432–2438.
Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, et al. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010;10:469–474.
Soroceanu A, Smith JS, Lau D, et al. Establishing the minimum clinically important difference in Neck Disability Index and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for adult cervical deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33:1–5.
Virk S, Passias P, Lafage R, et al. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures. Spine J. 2020;20:1267–1275.
Naggara O, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:437–440.
Park MS, Moon SH, Kim TH, et al. Sagittal alignment based on inflection point and its differences according to age groups. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28:2309499020904615.
Smith JS, Ramchandran S, Lafage V, et al. Prospective multicenter assessment of early complication rates associated with adult cervical deformity surgery in 78 patients. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:1.
Passias PG, Vasquez-Montes D, Poorman GW, et al. Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery. Spine J. 2018;18:2187–2194.
Shah NV, Jain I, Moattari CR, et al. Comparing predictors of complications following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Total Disc Replacement (TDR), and combined ACDF-TDR with minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J. 2018;18:S79.
Protopsaltis TS, Ramchandran S, Hamilton DK, et al. Analysis of successful versus failed radiographic outcomes after cervical deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E773–E781.
Moses MJ, Tishelman JC, Zhou PL, et al. McGregor’s slope and slope of line of sight: two surrogate markers for Chin-Brow vertical angle in the setting of cervical spine pathology. Spine J. 2019;19:1512–1517.
Passias PG, Oh C, Horn SR, et al. Predicting the occurrence of complications following corrective cervical deformity surgery: analysis of a prospective multicenter database using predictive analytics. Spine J. 2017;17:S242–S243.
Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R, et al. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23: 673–683.
Horn SR, Passias PG, Passfall L, et al; International Spine Study Group (ISSG). Improvement in some Ames-ISSG cervical deformity classification modifier grades may correlate with clinical improvement. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;89:297–304.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231005 Date Completed: 20231218 Latest Revision: 20231218
رمز التحديث: 20231218
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004843
PMID: 37796161
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004843