دورية أكاديمية

Total Fertilization Failure: A Single Center Analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Total Fertilization Failure: A Single Center Analysis.
المؤلفون: de Souza LK; Insemine Center for Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil. lisiane@insemine.com., Witusk JPD; Insemine Center for Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil., Galgaro BC; Insemine Center for Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil., Rodrigues LDS; Insemine Center for Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil., da Cunha-Filho JSL; Insemine Center for Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
المصدر: Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) [Reprod Sci] 2024 Mar; Vol. 31 (3), pp. 697-703. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 09.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101291249 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1933-7205 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19337191 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Reprod Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2020- : [New York] : Springer
Original Publication: Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Fertilization in Vitro* , Infertility*/therapy, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Case-Control Studies ; Oocytes ; Anti-Mullerian Hormone ; Fertilization/physiology ; Pregnancy Rate
مستخلص: Our main objective was to identify the male and female parameters associated with total fertilization failure (TFF) in IVF with nonmasculine indications. The present work, IRB equivalent INS 63209, is a case-control study that evaluated all cases with TFF after conventional IVF at the Center for Human Reproduction from January 2010 to December 2019 (n = 154). As a control group, we analyzed all patients who did not experience fertilization failure after conventional IVF in the same period (n = 475). We evaluated various parameters, both male and female, assessed during infertility treatment, and only cases without masculine etiology (normal seminal parameters) were included. Ages (female and male) were not different between the groups. Moreover, AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), semen volume, preprocessing concentration and preprocessing motility were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the number of collected oocytes (study versus control groups, median [25-75 interquartile]: 2 [1-5] and 5 [3-8]); MII (2 [1-4] and 5 [2-7]); and postprocessing motility (85 [70-90] and 90 [80-95]) were significantly different between both groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis including all significant data demonstrated that the number of collected oocytes was significantly related to IVF failure. Patients with fewer than 5 oocytes had an OR of - 1.37 (- 0.938 to - 1.827) for TFF after conventional IVF. Our results showed that a lower follicular response to controlled ovarian stimulation, evidenced by a decreased number of collected oocytes, was the most important parameter associated with IVF failure in nonmasculine infertility.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation.)
References: Kahyaoglu I, Demir B, Turkkanı A, Cınar O, Dilbaz S, Dilbaz B, Mollamahmutoglu L. Total fertilization failure: is it the end of the story? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1155–60. (PMID: 10.1007/s10815-014-0281-5249627884156939)
Swain JE, Pool TB. ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:431–46. (PMID: 10.1093/humupd/dmn02518603645)
Mahutte NG, Arici A. Failed fertilization: is it predictable? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:211–8. (PMID: 10.1097/00001703-200306000-0000112858108)
Wall MB, Marks K, Smith TA, Gearon CM, Muggleton-Harris AL. Cytogenetic and fluorescent in-situ hybridization chromosomal studies on in-vitro fertilized and intracytoplasmic sperm injected “failed-fertilized” human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2230–8. (PMID: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a0190828943535)
Edirisinghe WR, Murch A, Junk S, Yovich JL. Cytogenetic abnormalities of unfertilized oocytes generated from in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a double-blind study. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2784–91. (PMID: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.27849455853)
Hull MG, Fleming CF, Hughes AO, McDermott A. The age-related decline in female fecundity: a quantitative controlled study of implanting capacity and survival of individual embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:783–90. (PMID: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58214-48654639)
Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO. The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:400–5. (PMID: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48080-56468675)
Jeulin C, Feneux D, Serres C, Jouannet P, Guillet-Rosso F, Belaisch-Allart J, Frydman R, Testart J. Sperm factors related to failure of human in-vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil. 1986;76:735–44. (PMID: 10.1530/jrf.0.07607353701710)
Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–7. (PMID: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59660-53335257)
Liu DY, Lopata A, Johnston WIH, Baker HWG. Human sperm—zona pellucida binding, sperm characteristics and in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:696–701. (PMID: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a1369692778055)
Franken DR, Kruger TF, Oehninger S, Coddington CC, Lombard C, Smith K, Hodgen GD. Andrology: the ability of the hemizona assay to predict human fertilization in different and consecutive in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1240–4. (PMID: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a1382348408521)
Oehninger S, Mahony M, Ozgür K, Kolm P, Kruger T, Franken D. Clinical significance of human sperm-zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:1121–7. (PMID: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81449-59176454)
Aziz N, Buchan I, Taylor C, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones I. The sperm deformity index: a reliable predictor of the outcome of oocyte fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:1000–8. (PMID: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58697-X8941069)
Lai Q, Chen C, Zhang Z, Zhang S, Yu Q, Yang P, Hu J, Wang C-Y. The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:258–66. (PMID: 233300113544237)
Bessow C, Donato R, de Souza T, Chapon R, Genro V, Cunha-Filho JS. Antral follicle responsiveness assessed by follicular output RaTe(FORT) correlates with follicles diameter. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12:48. (PMID: 10.1186/s13048-019-0522-4311285936535188)
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:275–89. (PMID: 10.1093/humupd/dmg01812859048)
Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, Fanchin R. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(4):1066–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der479 .
Ligon S, Lustik M, Levy G, Pier B. Low antimüllerian hormone (AMH) is associated with decreased live birth after in vitro fertilization when follicle-stimulating hormone and AMH are discordant. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:73-81.e1. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.02231056310)
van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJC, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BCJM, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:476–80. (PMID: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60633-517007663)
Hamoda H, Sunkara S, Khalaf Y, Braude P, El-Toukhy T. Outcome of fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in relation to the number of oocytes collected: a review of 4,701 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:147.
Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74. (PMID: 10.1093/humrep/der10621558332)
Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, Muasher SJ. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:967–73. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.02624462057)
Magnusson Å, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:58–64. (PMID: 10.1093/humrep/dex33429136154)
Ji J, Liu Y, Tong XH, Luo L, Ma J, Chen Z. The optimum number of oocytes in IVF treatment: an analysis of 2455 cycles in China. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2728–34. (PMID: 10.1093/humrep/det30323887075)
De Conto E, Genro VK, da Silva DS, de Chapon R, CB, Cunha-Filho JSL,. AMH as a prognostic factor for blastocyst development. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19:131–4. (PMID: 10.5935/1518-0557.2015002927203091)
Su N, Zhan J, Xie M, Zhao Y, Huang C, Wang S, Liao L, Zhang X, Liu F. High anti-Mullerian hormone level is adversely associated with cumulative live birth rates of two embryo transfers after the first initiated cycle in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1123125. (PMID: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1123125)
Lu YJ, Li Q, Chen LX, Tian T, Kang J, Hao YX, Zhou JS, Wang YY, Yan LY, Li R, Chang L, Qiao J. Association between maternal MTHFR C677T/A1298C combination polymorphisms and IVF/ICSI outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(1):hoac055. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac055 .
Krog M, Prior M, Carlsen E, Loft A, Forman J, Pinborg A, Andersen AN. Fertilization failure after IVF in 304 couples–a case-control study on predictors and long-term prognosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;184:32–7. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.03725498474)
Tian T, Chen L, Yang R, Long X, Li Q, Hao Y, Kong F, Li R, Wang Y, Qiao J. Prediction of fertilization disorders in the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective study of 106,728 treatment cycles. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:870708. (PMID: 10.3389/fendo.2022.870708)
Tian T, Kong F, Yang R, et al. A Bayesian network model for prediction of low or failed fertilization in assisted reproductive technology based on a large clinical real-world data. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21:8. (PMID: 10.1186/s12958-023-01065-x367031719878771)
Tannus S, Son W-Y, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan M-H. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:119–24. (PMID: 27852688)
Isikoglu M, Ceviren AK, Cetin T, Avci A, Aydinuraz B, Akgul OK, Karaca M. Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;306:493–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00404-022-06471-x35224650)
Supramaniam PR, Granne I, Ohuma EO, Lim LN, McVeigh E, Venkatakrishnan R, Becker CM, Mittal M. ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:583–94. (PMID: 10.1093/humrep/dez30132161952)
Iwamoto A, Summers KM, Sparks AE, Mancuso AC, Van Voorhis BJ. ICSI VS. Conventional IVF use in non-male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:e16. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.052)
Hervás I, Pacheco A, Rivera-Egea R, Gil Julia M, Navarro-Gomezlechon A, Garrido N. IVF/ICSI cumulative live birth rates per consumed oocyte remain comparable regardless of sperm DNA fragmentation by TUNEL. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(6):1079–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.010 .
Harris AL, Vanegas JC, Hariton E, Bortoletto P, Palmor M, Humphries LA, Tanrikut C, Chavarro JE, Styer AK. Semen parameters on the day of oocyte retrieval predict low fertilization during conventional insemination IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:291–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s10815-018-1336-930415469)
del M. Molina Hita M, Lobo Martínez S, González Varea C, Montejo Gadea JM. Correlation between the number of oocytes and the pregnancy rate in IVF-ICSI cycles. Revista Iberoamericana de Fertilidad y Reproduccion Humana. 2008;25(3):153–9.
Ambe AK, González SE, Mondragón EC, Monterrosas LD. Comparative analysis of pregnancy rate/captured oocytes in an in vitro fertilization program. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008;76:256–60.
Li HWR, Lee VCY, Ho PC, Ng EHY. Ovarian sensitivity index is a better measure of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation than the number of oocytes during in-vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:199–203. (PMID: 10.1007/s10815-013-0144-524317853)
Li HWR, Lee VCY, Lau EYL, Yeung WSB, Ho PC, Ng EHY. Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61095. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061095236377873634063)
Broer SL, Mol BWJ, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJM. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:705–14. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.01318321493)
Genro VK, Matte U, De Conto E, Cunha-Filho JS, Fanchin R. Frequent polymorphisms of FSH receptor do not influence antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration as assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:657–63. (PMID: 10.1007/s10815-012-9761-7225278963401262)
Connell MT, Richter KS, Devine K, Hill MJ, DeCherney AH, Doyle JO, Tucker MJ, Levy MJ. Larger oocyte cohorts maximize fresh IVF cycle birth rates and availability of surplus high-quality blastocysts for cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38:711–23. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.00730922557)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology (ART); Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF); Fertilization; Total fertilization failure (TFF)
المشرفين على المادة: 80497-65-0 (Anti-Mullerian Hormone)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231009 Date Completed: 20240306 Latest Revision: 20240306
رمز التحديث: 20240306
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01338-1
PMID: 37814199
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE