دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Current status and influencing factors of policy identification in health impact assessment: a case study of Zhejiang Province.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Current status and influencing factors of policy identification in health impact assessment: a case study of Zhejiang Province.
المؤلفون: Liu X; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Liu Y; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Xu Y; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Song L; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Huang Z; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Zhu X; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China., Zhang M; School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China. zhangmeng@hznu.edu.cn.
المصدر: Health research policy and systems [Health Res Policy Syst] 2023 Nov 06; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 118. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 06.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101170481 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-4505 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14784505 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Res Policy Syst Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2003-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Policy* , Health Impact Assessment*/methods, Humans ; Health Policy
مستخلص: Background: Health impact assessment (HIA) is a procedure, method and tool for evaluating the potential health impacts of policies, plans and construction projects, as well as the distribution of these impacts on population. Majority of international studies on health impact assessment have focussed on conceptual papers or case evaluations, neglecting participants' views on policies.
Methods: A semi-structured interview with 30 health impact assessment experts was employed in this study, and the Nvivo software was utilized to analyse factors that influence policy identification. Subsequently, a multi-stage stratified random sampling method was adopted to survey 655 pilot staff members involved in health impact assessment in Zhejiang Province. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the current status and identify the factors influencing policy identification. In addition, hierarchical linear regression analysis and structural equation modelling were employed to determine the relationship between policy identification and influencing factors.
Results: Statistically significant differences were found among participants in the level of identification of policies across three dimensions. The policy sentiment dimension had the highest score (4.137 ± 0.664), followed by policy cognition (4.075 ± 0.632) and policy evaluation (3.631 ± 0.797) dimensions. Subject trust had a positive impact on policy cognition (β = 0.503, P < 0.001), policy sentiment (β = 0.504, P < 0.001) and policy evaluation (β = 0.465, P < 0.001). Procedural justice had a positive impact on policy sentiment (β = 0.085, P < 0.01) and policy evaluation (β = 0.084, P < 0.05), but not policy cognition (β = 0.056, P > 0.05). Policy identification is influenced by age and average monthly salary among other factors.
Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of subjective trust and procedural justice in policy identification of health impact assessment. They provide valuable insights to developing interventions to overcome barriers to the implementation and enhancement of global identification of policies. Going forward, cross-sectoral synergies, enhanced international communication and training to increase participants' trust in the policy should be optimized to improve health impact assessment. Additional measures should be taken, such as ensuring seamless communication channels, embedding health impact assessment in administrative mechanisms, and establishing strong oversight and grievance mechanisms to improve fairness and transparency in the implementation and results of health impact assessment.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
References: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):104-18. (PMID: 19210067)
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Feb;47(2):246-255. (PMID: 29445635)
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):950-5. (PMID: 19934171)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 08;18(18):. (PMID: 34574390)
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Apr 1;91(4):298-305. (PMID: 23599554)
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):610-629. (PMID: 29392740)
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):404-7. (PMID: 12894323)
Sante Publique. 2021 Jun 24;Vol. 33(1):27-35. (PMID: 34372637)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;17(9):. (PMID: 32344882)
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114874. (PMID: 35278975)
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jul 30;:1-14. (PMID: 35967504)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: China; Health impact assessment; Policy identification
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231107 Date Completed: 20231108 Latest Revision: 20231110
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10626660
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01064-9
PMID: 37932791
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1478-4505
DOI:10.1186/s12961-023-01064-9