دورية أكاديمية
Comparison of the fracture strengths of single-unit metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconium restorations in the molar region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
| العنوان: | Comparison of the fracture strengths of single-unit metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconium restorations in the molar region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Işisağ Ö; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Inonu Boulevard No: 4, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. ozer.isisag@afsu.edu.tr., Pektaş N; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Inonu Boulevard No: 4, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. |
| المصدر: | Odontology [Odontology] 2024 Jul; Vol. 112 (3), pp. 751-760. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 16. |
| نوع المنشور: | Systematic Review; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Comparative Study |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer-Verlag Tokyo Country of Publication: Japan NLM ID: 101134822 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1618-1255 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16181247 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Odontology Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Tokyo : Springer-Verlag Tokyo, c2001- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Zirconium*/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure* , Molar* , Metal Ceramic Alloys*/chemistry, Humans ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dental Materials/chemistry ; Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods |
| مستخلص: | Despite the success of monolithic zirconia restorations (MZ), metal-ceramic restorations (MC) are still considered the gold standard for fixed prosthetics in the posterior region. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the fracture strengths of single-unit MC and MZ in the molar region. This review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA, 2020) statement. All articles were searched from the PubMed and Web of Science databases until November 18, 2022. All in vitro studies evaluating the fracture strengths of MC and MZ were also included. Statistical analysis was performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis program, with a significance level of 0.05. Out of 753 studies, five were selected. The fracture strengths of MZ and MC did not show any statistically significant difference for both tooth (95% CI - 1.589: 2.118, p = 0.779, z = 0.280) and implant (95% CI - 2.215: 2.191, p = 0.992 z = - 0.010) supported restorations. However, different abutment materials (p < 0.001) and aging treatments (p < 0.001) in tooth-supported restorations displayed a significant statistical difference. Additionally, a significant difference was also observed in subgroup analysis considering different cements (p = 0.001) and load speeds (p = 0.001) in implant-supported restorations. Fracture strengths of MZ and MC did not show a significant statistical difference in implant or tooth-supported single-unit posterior restorations. MZ may be a suitable alternative to MC in single-unit posterior restorations. The results should be interpreted with caution, as the included studies were in vitro. (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.) |
| References: | Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58:208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.00325172234) López-Suárez C, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Lynch CD, Suárez-García MJ. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling. J Dent. 2018;73:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2018.04.012 . (PMID: 10.1016/J.JDENT.2018.04.01229678585) Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS. Yeo IS (2013) Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:296–304. https://doi.org/10.4047/JAP.2013.5.3.296 . (PMID: 10.4047/JAP.2013.5.3.296240495713774944) Stober T, Bermejo JL, Schwindling FS, Schmitter M. Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:621–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOOR.12409 . (PMID: 10.1111/JOOR.1240927198539) Weigl P, Saarepera K, Hinrikus K, Wu Y, Trimpou G, Lorenz J. Screw-retained monolithic zirconia vs. cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns: a prospective randomized clinical trial in split-mouth design. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:1067–75. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-018-2531-x29946832) Ispas A, Iosif L, Popa D, Negucioiu M, Constantiniuc M, Bacali C, Buduru S. Comparative assessment of the functional parameters for metal-ceramic and all-ceramic teeth restorations in prosthetic dentistry—a literature review. Biology (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040556 . (PMID: 10.3390/biology1104055635453755) Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-070-LIT . (PMID: 10.2341/13-070-LIT23937401) García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Albaladejo A, Montiel-Company JM, Bellot-Arcís C. The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0190736 . (PMID: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0190736301928146128544) Da Rosa WLDO, Piva E, Da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.00325882585) Zhang LX, Hong DW, Zheng M, Yu H. Is the bond strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate lower than that of lithium disilicate?—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66:530–7. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00112 . (PMID: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_0011234853237) Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 (updated February 2022), Chapter 7, Cochrane; 2022. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook . Accessed 2 Jan 2023. Makhija SK, Lawson NC, Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, McClelland JA, Louis DR, Gordan VV, Pihlstrom DJ, Meyerowitz C, Mungia R, McCracken MS. Dentist material selection for single-unit crowns: findings from the national dental practice-based research network. J Dent. 2016;55:40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2016.09.010 . (PMID: 10.1016/J.JDENT.2016.09.010276937785125852) Griggs JA. Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:713–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CDEN.2007.04.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/J.CDEN.2007.04.006175861522833171) Bacchi A, Boccardi S, Alessandretti R, Pereira GKR. Substrate masking ability of bilayer and monolithic ceramics used for complete crowns and the effect of association with an opaque resin-based luting agent. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63:321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.01.005 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.01.00530755361) Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Hoffmann R, Noack F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. A novel CAD/CAM base metal compared to conventional CoCrMo alloys: an in-vitro study of the long-term metal-ceramic bond strength. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13:446–52. https://doi.org/10.4172/2247-2452.1000607 . (PMID: 10.4172/2247-2452.100060724984663) Mühlemann S, Lakha T, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Prosthetic outcomes and clinical performance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia versus porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns in the molar region: 1-year results of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31:856–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13631 . (PMID: 10.1111/clr.1363132562324) Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:602–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479 . (PMID: 10.3109/00016357.2015.100747925635734) Malkondu Ö, Tinastepe N, Akan E, Kazazoğlu E. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2016;30:644–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470 . (PMID: 10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470) Lameira DP, Silva WABE, Silva FAE, De Souza GM. Fracture strength of aged monolithic and bilayer zirconia-based crowns. Biomed Res Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/418641 . (PMID: 10.1155/2015/418641265764234631855) Monteiro JB, Riquieri H, Prochnow C, Guilardi LF, Pereira GKR, Borges ALS, de Melo RM, Valandro LF. Fatigue failure load of two resin-bonded zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics: effect of ceramic thickness. Dent Mater. 2018;34:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.00429588077) Yucel MT, Yondem I, Aykent F, Eraslan O. Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1105–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0606-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-011-0606-z21845404) Dimitrova M, Corsalini M, Kazakova R, Vlahova A, Chuchulska B, Barile G, Capodiferro S, Kazakov S. Comparison between conventional PMMA and 3D printed resins for denture bases: a narrative review. J Compos Sci. 2022;6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6030087 . (PMID: 10.3390/jcs6030087) Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 . (PMID: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-69916767) Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:437–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.008 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.00828645667) Naves LZ, Da Silva GR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Costa R, Valdivia ADCM, Soares CJ. Influence of crosshead speed on failure load and failure mode of restored maxillary premolars. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0003 . (PMID: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0003) Silveira MPM, Campaner LM, Bottino MA, Nishioka RS, Borges ALS, Tribst JPM. Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Dent Med Probl. 2021;58:69–74. (PMID: 10.17219/dmp/13084733687804) Cheng CW, Chien CH, Chen CJ, Papaspyridakos P. Randomized Controlled clinical trial to compare posterior implant-supported modified monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns: one-year results. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12767 . (PMID: 10.1111/jopr.1276729528175) Rammelsberg P, Meyer A, Lorenzo-Bermejo J, Kappel S, Zenthöfer A. Long-term chipping and failure rates of implant-supported and combined tooth–implant-supported metal-ceramic and ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a cohort study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.020 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.02032800577) Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:770–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.00224980739) Mangano F, Veronesi G. Digital versus analog procedures for the prosthetic restoration of single implants: a randomized controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5325032 . (PMID: 10.1155/2018/5325032301123986077568) Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0216294493081255) Alqutaibi AY, Ghulam O, Krsoum M, Binmahmoud S, Taher H, Elmalky W, Zafar MS. Revolution of current dental zirconia: a comprehensive review. Molecules. 2022;27(5):1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051699 . (PMID: 10.3390/molecules27051699352688008911694) Kongkiatkamon S, Rokaya D, Kengtanyakich S, Peampring C. Current classification of zirconia in dentistry: an updated review. PeerJ. 2023;11: e15669. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15669 . (PMID: 10.7717/peerj.156693746515810351515) Mastrogianni A, Lioliou EA, Tortopidis D, Gogos C, Kontonasaki E, Koidis P. Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars restored with different post systems and metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater J. 2021;40:606–14. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-223 . (PMID: 10.4012/dmj.2020-22333456031) Agustín-Panadero R, León MR, Solá-Ruíz MF, Fons-Font A, García Engra G, Fernández-Estevan L. Are metal-free monolithic crowns the present of prosthesis? Study of mechanical behaviour. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;12:3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12223663 . (PMID: 10.3390/ma1222366331703291) Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, Liu R, Ma S, Zhou Z, Longquan S. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;35:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.01424762856) Bajunaid SO, Alshiddi I, Alhomaidhi L, Almutairi R, Alolayan S, Habib SR. Comparison of the fracture resistance and fracture mode of contemporary restorative materials to overcome the offset of mandibular implant-supported, Cement-Retained Crowns. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;14:4838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174838 . (PMID: 10.3390/ma1417483834500928) Brizuela-Velasco A, Diéguez-Pereira M, Álvarez-Arenal Á, Chávarri-Prado D, Solaberrieta E, Fernández-González FJ, Chento-Valiente Y, Santamaría-Arrieta G. Fracture resistance of monolithic high translucency zirconia ımplant-supported crowns. Implant Dent. 2016;25:624–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000439 . (PMID: 10.1097/ID.000000000000043927356198) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Fracture strength; Meta-analysis; Metal ceramic restorations; Zirconia |
| المشرفين على المادة: | C6V6S92N3C (Zirconium) 0 (Metal Ceramic Alloys) S38N85C5G0 (zirconium oxide) 0 (Dental Materials) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231216 Date Completed: 20240724 Latest Revision: 20240724 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240725 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10266-023-00878-x |
| PMID: | 38103151 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1618-1255 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10266-023-00878-x |