دورية أكاديمية
Clinical innovation and scope of practice regulation: a case study of the Charlie Teo decision.
العنوان: | Clinical innovation and scope of practice regulation: a case study of the Charlie Teo decision. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Walsh J; |
المصدر: | Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association [Aust Health Rev] 2024 Feb; Vol. 48 (1), pp. 91-94. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: CSIRO Pub Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 8214381 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1449-8944 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01565788 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Aust Health Rev |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2010- : Collingwood, Victoria : CSIRO Pub. Original Publication: [Sydney, Australia] : The Association. |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Scope of Practice* , Delivery of Health Care*, Humans ; New South Wales ; Informed Consent |
مستخلص: | The issue of regulation of scope of practice (SOP) has recently been highlighted through the high-profile case of New South Wales-based neurosurgeon, Mr Charles Teo and specifically the finding of 'unsatisfactory professional conduct' by the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) in Teo, Charles (2023) NSWMPSC 2 (12 July 2023). The HCCC decision went to two issues in Teo's practice: (1) his decision to perform a surgery not within the SOP of his profession [at 238]; and (2) his failure to gain patient informed consent for that surgery [at 245]. This paper explores the findings against Teo with respect to SOP and recommends a nuanced approach to the regulation of clinical innovation and SOP evolution. |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231221 Date Completed: 20240202 Latest Revision: 20240202 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240202 |
DOI: | 10.1071/AH23157 |
PMID: | 38127823 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
كن أول من يترك تعليقا!