دورية أكاديمية

European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care consensus document on sustainability: 4 scopes to achieve a more sustainable practice.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care consensus document on sustainability: 4 scopes to achieve a more sustainable practice.
المؤلفون: Gonzalez-Pizarro P; From the Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia and Critical Care. La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain (PGP), the Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Citta' della Salute e della Scienza' University Hospital, Department of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (LB), the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) Odense, Department of Anesthesia, Hospital of Nykobing Falster, Denmark (SK), the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, and Campus Virchow Klinikum (SK), the Department of Anaesthesiology. LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany (AT), the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Institute Curie & PSL Research University, Paris, France (JM), the Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (NSW), the Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperatve Medicine. Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia (GJ), the Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Italy. Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy (AC), the Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal (TDF), the Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany (PK), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain. P&A Kyriakou Children's Hospital Athens Greece (AM), Royal Alexandra Hospital. Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom (PM), Department of Neuro-anaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, England, United Kingdom (LM), the Department of Anesthesia, Critical care and Pain Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Research Methods Department, European University of Valencia, Spain (CR), the 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rome, Italy (FB), the Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care - Department of Medicine and Surgery - University of Perugia Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy (EDR), the Division of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (WB)., Brazzi L, Koch S, Trinks A, Muret J, Sperna Weiland N, Jovanovic G, Cortegiani A, Fernandes TD, Kranke P, Malisiova A, McConnell P, Misquita L, Romero CS, Bilotta F, De Robertis E, Buhre W
مؤلفون مشاركون: Sustainability National Representatives
المصدر: European journal of anaesthesiology [Eur J Anaesthesiol] 2024 Apr 01; Vol. 41 (4), pp. 260-277. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 18.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009- Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8411711 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2346 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02650215 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Anaesthesiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Cambridge : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009-
Original Publication: Oxford ; Boston : Published on behalf of the European Academy of Anaesthesiology by Blackwell Scientific, 1984-2004
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anesthesiology* , Anesthesia*, Humans ; Consensus ; China ; Critical Care
مستخلص: Climate change is a defining issue for our generation. The carbon footprint of clinical practice accounts for 4.7% of European greenhouse gas emissions, with the European Union ranking as the third largest contributor to the global healthcare industry's carbon footprint, after the United States and China. Recognising the importance of urgent action, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) adopted the Glasgow Declaration on Environmental Sustainability in June 2023. Building on this initiative, the ESAIC Sustainability Committee now presents a consensus document in perioperative sustainability. Acknowledging wider dimensions of sustainability, beyond the environmental one, the document recognizes healthcare professionals as cornerstones for sustainable care, and puts forward recommendations in four main areas: direct emissions, energy, supply chain and waste management, and psychological and self-care of healthcare professionals. Given the urgent need to cut global carbon emissions, and the scarcity of evidence-based literature on perioperative sustainability, our methodology is based on expert opinion recommendations. A total of 90 recommendations were drafted by 13 sustainability experts in anaesthesia in March 2023, then validated by 36 experts from 24 different countries in a two-step Delphi validation process in May and June 2023. To accommodate different possibilities for action in high- versus middle-income countries, an 80% agreement threshold was set to ease implementation of the recommendations Europe-wide. All recommendations surpassed the 80% agreement threshold in the first Delphi round, and 88 recommendations achieved an agreement >90% in the second round. Recommendations include the use of very low fresh gas flow, choice of anaesthetic drug, energy and water preserving measures, "5R" policies including choice of plastics and their disposal, and recommendations to keep a healthy work environment or on the importance of fatigue in clinical practice. Executive summaries of recommendations in areas 1, 2 and 3 are available as cognitive aids that can be made available for quick reference in the operating room.
(Copyright © 2024 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.)
References: Pichler P, Jaccard I, Weisz U, et al. International comparison of healthcare carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett 2019; 14:1–8.
Boyd R, Ashby B, Steele K, et al. Healthcare without harm. Healthcare's climate footprint – how the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action 2019; 8Available at: https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/healthcares-climate-footprint . [Accessed September 27, 2022].
Shukla J, Skea R, Slade A, et al. IPCC, 2022: climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. contribution of Working Group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change P.R. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA; Cambridge University Press; p.7.
Shukla J, Skea R, Slade A, et al. IPCC, 2022: climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change P.R. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. p.5.
James E H, Makiko S, Leon S, et al. Global warming in the pipeline. Oxford Open Climate Change 2023; 3:kgad008.
Shukla J, Skea R, Slade A, et al. IPCC, 2022: Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. P Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA:R. Cambridge University Press. p.15 & 24.
The World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. 2017. Environmentally sustainable health systems: a strategic document. Copenhagen: The World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
Buhre W, De Robertis E, Gonzalez-Pizarro P. The Glasgow declaration on sustainability in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:461–464.
Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF. The Helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:592–597.
White SM, Shelton CL, Gelb AW, et al. Sherman JD representing the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists Global Working Group on Environmental Sustainability in Anaesthesia. Principles of environmentally-sustainable anaesthesia: a global consensus statement from the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:201–212.
Vollmer MK, Rhee TS, Rigby M, et al. Modern inhalation anesthetics: potent greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett 2015; 42:1606–1611.
MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health 2017; 1:e381–e388.
Devlin-Hegedus JA, McGain F, Harris RD, Sherman JD. Action guidance for addressing pollution from inhalational anaesthetics. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:1023–1029.
McGain F, Muret J, Lawson C, et al. Environmental sustainability within anaesthesia and critical care. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:680–692.
National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries. Br J Surg 2023; 110:804–817.
Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’).OJ L 243,9.7.2021, p. 1.
Hossaini R, Chipperfield MP, Saiz-Lopez A, et al. Growth in stratospheric chlorine from short-lived chemicals not controlled by the Montreal Protocol. Geophys Res Lett 2015; 42:4573–4580.
Brown AC, Canosa-Mas CE, Parr AD, et al. Tropospheric lifetimes of halogenated anaesthetics. Nature 1989; 341:635–637.
Patricio G-P, Susanne K, Jane M, et al. Environmental sustainability in the operating room: a worldwide survey among anaesthesiologists. Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care 2023; 2:e0025-1-10.
Bomberg H, Glas M, Groesdonk VH, et al. A novel device for target controlled administration and reflection of desflurane – the Mirus™. Anaesthesia 2014; 69:1241–1250.
Sulbaek Andersen MP, Nielsen OJ, Sherman JD. The global warming potentials for anesthetic gas sevoflurane need significant corrections. Environ Sci Technol 2021; 55:10189–10191.
Shine KP. Climate effect of inhaled anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:731–733.
Özelsel TJ, Sondekoppam RV, Buro K. The future is now-it's time to rethink the application of the Global Warming Potential to anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2019; 66:1291–1295.
Muret J, Fernandes TD, Gerlach H, et al. Environmental impacts of nitrous oxide: no laughing matter! Comment on Br J Anaesth 2019;122:587–604. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:e481–e482.
Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009; 326:123–125.
Campbell M, Pierce TJM. Atmospheric science, anaesthesia, and the environment. BJA Educ 2015; 15:173–179.
Hu X, Tom Pierce JM, Taylor T, Morrissey K. The carbon footprint of general anaesthetics: a case study in the UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 2021; 167:105411.
Hinterberg J, Beffart T, Gabriel A, et al. Efficiency of inhaled anaesthetic recapture in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:e79–e81.
Rauchenwald V, Rollins MD, Ryan SM, et al. New method of destroying waste anesthetic gases using gas-phase photochemistry. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:288–297.
Brooks P, Absalom AR. When will we call time on desflurane? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2022;129:e79-e81. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:e81–e82.
Nordic Know-How 2020. nordicshc.org/images//UPDATED_Nordic_know-how_2020_.pdf [Last accessed April 2021].
Pearson F, Sheridan N, Pierce JMT. Estimate of the total carbon footprint and component carbon sources of different modes of labour analgesia. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:486–488.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on fluorinated greenhouse gases, amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and repealing Regulation (EU) No. 517/2014. European commission, 2022 [Accessed 18.10.2022].
Sherman J, Le C, Lamers V, Eckelman M. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:1086–1090.
AstraZeneca. Environmental Risk Assessment Data: Propofol. 2020. Availaleat: https://www.astrazeneca.com/content/dam/az/our-company/Sustainability/2017/Propofol.pdf [Last accessed October 3rd, 2022].
National Center for Biotechnology Information. Compound summary. Propofol, 2020. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Propofol [Accessed 20 January 2021].
Varughese S, Ahmed R. Environmental and occupational considerations of anesthesia: a narrative review and update. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:826–835.
Stockholm City Council. Pharmaceuticals and environment: Propofol. 2020. Available at: https://www.janusinfo.se/beslutsstod/lakemedelochmiljo/pharmaceuticalsandenvironment/databaseenven/propofol.5.30a7505616a041a09b063eac.html [Last accessed October 3rd, 2022].
Mullot JU, Karolak S, Fontova A, Levi Y. Modeling of hospital wastewater pollution by pharmaceuticals: first results of Mediflux study carried out in three French hospitals. Water Sci Technol 2010; 62:2912–2919.
Falås P, Andersen HR, Ledin A, la Cour Jansen J. Occurrence and reduction of pharmaceuticals in the water phase at Swedish wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 2012; 66:66–91.
Gillerman RG, Browning RA. Drug use inefficiency: a hidden source of wasted healthcare dollars. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:921–924.
Mankes RF. Propofol wastage in anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:1091–1092.
Shelton CL, Knagg R, Sondekoppam RV, McGain F. Towards zero carbon healthcare: anaesthesia. BMJ 2022; 379:e069030.
Zattoni J, Rossi A, Cella F, et al. Propofol 1% and propofol 2% are equally effective and well tolerated during anaesthesia of patients undergoing elective craniotomy for neurosurgical procedures. Minerva Anestesiol 2000; 66:531–539.
Long MHY, Lim EHL, Balanza GA, et al. Sevoflurane requirements during electroencephalogram (EEG)-guided vs standard anesthesia Care in Children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2022; 81:110913.
Lee KH, Egan TD, Johnson KB. Raw and processed electroencephalography in modern anesthesia practice: a brief primer on select clinical applications. Korean J Anesthesiol 2021; 74:465–477.
Kaiser HA, Hight D, Avidan MS. A narrative review of electroencephalogram-based monitoring during cardiovascular surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:92–100.
Kah O, Bräunlich K, Schulz T, et al . Schumacher, Grundlagenstudie zur Umsetzung des Passivhauskonzept in Krankenhäusern/Baseline study on implementing the Passive House concept in hospitals, Studie im Auftrag des Hessischen Ministeriums für Wirtschaft, Verkehr und Landesentwicklung, Passivhaus Institut, Darmstadt 2013.
United Nations. Global Issues: Water. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/water [Accessed November 2022].
Alsved M, Civilis A, Ekolind P, et al. Temperature-controlled airflow ventilation in operating rooms compared with laminar airflow and turbulent mixed airflow. J Hosp Infect 2018; 98:181e90.
Bolten A, Kringos DS, Spijkerman IJB, Sperna Weiland NH. The carbon footprint of the operating room related to infection prevention measures: a scoping review. J Hosp Infect 2022; 128:64–73.
Lin J, Pai JY, Chen CC. Applied patent RFID systems for building reacting HEPA air ventilation system in hospital operation rooms. J Med Syst 2012; 36:3399e405.
Jarvis I. Operating room ventilation systems. Best practices guide for energy efficiency, health and safety. Ontario, Toronto; 2017. Available at: https://www.enerlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Enerlife-OR-Ventilation-Best-Practices-Guide-April-2017.pdf [last accessed November 2022].
Cichos KH, Hyde ZB, Mabry SE, et al. Optimization of orthopedic surgical instrument trays: lean principles to reduce fixed operating room expenses. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2834–2840.
Bayazit, Yilmaz, Sparrow, Ephraim M. Energy efficiency comparison of forced-air versus resistance heating devices for perioperative hypothermia management. Energy 2010; 35:1211–1215.
Brandt S, Oguz R, Hüttner H, et al. Resistive-polymer versus forced-air warming: comparable efficacy in orthopedic patients. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:834–838.
Feng W, Lin S, Huang D, et al. Surgical hand rubbing versus surgical hand scrubbing: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy. Injury 2020; 51:1250–1257.
Princess Alexandra Hospital Waste Management Operational Handling Guidelines, Clinical and Related Waste Management Plan 2012–2018;6.8: Recyclable Waste.
Laustsen G. Reduce-recycle-reuse: guidelines for promoting perioperative waste management. AORN J 2007; 85:717–728.
Queensland Government. Waste Reduction and Recycling Act 2011. Availble at: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/W/WasteRedRecR11.pdf [Accessed January 2, 2023].
Steenmeijer MA, Rodrigues JFD, Zijp MC, Waaijers-van der Loop SL. The environmental impact of the Dutch health-care sector beyond climate change: an input-output analysis. Lancet Planetary Health 2022; 6:e949–e957.
Ali M, Wang W, Chaudhry N, et al. Hospital waste management in developing countries: a mini review. Waste Manag Res 2017; 35:581–592.
Foran P. Education report. ACORN 2015; 28:28–30.
Pandit N, Tabish SA, Qadri GJ, et al. Biomedical waste management in a large teaching hospital. JK Practitioner 2007; 14:57–59.
McGain F, White S, Mossenson S, et al. A survey of anesthesiologists’ views of operating room recycling. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:1049–1054.
McGain F, Jarosz KM, Nguyen M, et al. Auditing operating room recycling: a management case report. A A Case Rep 2015; 5:47–50.
Laustsen G. Greening in healthcare. Nurs Manage 2010; 41:26–31.
Stall NM, Kagoma YM, Bondy JN, et al. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg 2013; 56:97–102.
Atcheson C, Spivack J, Williams R, et al. Preventable drug waste among anesthesia providers: Opportunities for efficiency. J Clin Anesth 2016; 30:24–32.
Life cycle-based sustainability standards and guidelines. ISO 14040-14044. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html [Accessed 2 January 2023].
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745/EU EUDAMED. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745 [Accessed January 2, 2023].
Eckelman M, Mosher M, Gonzalez A, Sherman J. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:1067–1072.
Alsabri A, Al-Ghamdi SG. Carbon footprint and embodied energy of PVC, PE, and PP piping: Perspective on environmental performance. Energy Rep 2020; 6: (Suppl 8): 364–370.
Yeoh CB, Lee KJ, Coric V, Tollinche LE. Simple green changes for anesthesia practices to make a difference. EC Clin Med Case Rep 2020; 3:1–6.
American Medical Association (AMA). Policy H-135.945: encouraging alternatives to PVC/DEHP products in health. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2006.
Bartl A. Moving from recycling to waste prevention: a review of barriers and enablers. Waste Manage Res 2014; 32:s3–s18.
Xin Y. Comparison of hospital medical waste generation rate based on diagnosis-related groups. J Cleaner Prod 2015; 100:202–207.
Sherman JD, Lewis R, Matthew E. Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement: comparing reusable and single-use disposable laryngoscopes. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:434–443.
McGain F, McAlister S, McGavin A, Story D. The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38:538–544.
Sanchez SA, Eckelman MJ, Sherman JD. Environmental and economic comparison of reusable and disposable blood pressure cuffs in multiple clinical settings. Resour Conserv Recycl 2020; 155:104643.
Grimmond T, Reiner S. Impact on carbon footprint: a life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital. Waste Manage Res 2012; 30:639–642.
Kwakye G, Brat G, Makary M. Green surgical practices for healthcare. Arch Surg 2011; 146:131–136.
Potera C. Strategies for greener hospital operating rooms. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120:a306–a307.
Gilden DJ, Scissors KN, Reuler JB. Disposable products in the hospital waste stream. West J Med 1992; 156:269–272.
Wyssusek KH, Foong WM, Steel C, Gillespie BM. The gold in garbage: implementing a waste segregation and recycling initiative. AORN J 2016; 316:e1.
Lee RJ, Mears SC. Greening of orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2012; 35:e940–e944.
Armoiry X, Carry P, Lehot J, et al. Estimated economic impact of prefilled ephedrine syringes in the operating room. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60:917–924.
van Straten B, van der Heiden DR, Robertson D, et al. Surgical waste reprocessing: injection molding using recycled blue wrapping paper from the operating room. J Clean Product 2021; 322:129121.
Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Lakbar I, et al. The burden of peri-operative work at night as perceived by anaesthesiologists: An international survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:326–333.
Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Misseri G, et al. Association between night/after-hours surgery and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2020; 124:623–637.
Health Education England – NHS Staff and Learners’ Mental Wellbeing Commission, February 2019, p.54. Available at: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/NHS%20%28HEE%29%20-%20Mental%20Wellbeing%20Commission%20Report.pdf [Accessed November 29,2022].
Fatigue Resources. AAGBI Foundation. (anaesthetists.org/fatigue). Available at: https://anaesthetists.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Wellbeing/Fatigue/Fatigue%20Resources.pdf?ver=2019-06-03-124659-903 [Accessed December 2022].
Ippolito M, Noto A, Lakbar I, et al. Peri-operative night-time work of anaesthesiologists: a qualitative study of critical issues and proposals. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:34–42.
Gander PH, Merry A, Millar MM, Weller J. Hours of work and fatigue-related error: a survey of New Zealand anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28:178–183.
Abramovich I, Matias B, Norte G, et al. Fatigue amongst anaesthesiology and intensive care trainees in Europe: a matter of concern. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:587–595.
McClelland L, Plunkett E, McCrossan R, et al. A national survey of out-of-hours working and fatigue in consultants in anaesthesia and paediatric intensive care in the UK and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1509–1523.
Shinde S, Yentis SM, Asanati K, et al. Guidelines on suicide amongst anaesthetists 2019. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:96–108.
The wellbeing advocate – Wellbeing special interest group. Anaesthesia continuing education (ACE). 2015. Available at: https://libguides.anzca.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=48309018 [Accessed December 2022].
– A systemic approach to workforce environment. A framework for improvement through reflection, curiosity and change. The National Workforce Skills Development Unit. Available at: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Workforce%20Stress%20and%20the%20Supportive%20Organisation_0.pdf . p. 4–-5 [Accessed January 2023].
Sprajcer M, Thomas MJW, Sargent C, et al. How effective are fatigue risk management systems (FRMS)? A review Accid Anal Prev 2022; 165:106398.
Cortegiani A, Gregoretti C, Neto AS, et al . Association between night-time surgery and occurrence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:361–9.
Mosendane T, Mosendane T, Raal FJ. Shift work and its effects on the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc J Afr 2008; 19:210–215.
Amelsvoort van L, Schouten E, Kok F. Duration of shiftwork related to body mass index and waist to hip ratio. Int J Obes 1999; 23:973–978.
Nightshift nutrition fact sheet. AAGBI Foundation (Association of Anaesthetists). Available at: https://anaesthetists.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Wellbeing/Fatigue/Nightshift%20nutrition.pdf?ver=2021-02-18-144134-867 [December 2022].
Series AIR. Environmental Noise. Enviromental Indicator Report 2018. European Environment Agency; 2018.
Pucher JRB, Bassett D, Danneberg A. Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health 2010; (100):1986–1992.
Delivering a ‘Net Zero Health Service’. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/greenernhs/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/10/delivering-a-net-zero-national-health-service.pdf [Accessed January 2023].
Andrews E, Pearson D, Kelly C, et al. Carbon footprint of patient journeys through primary care: a mixed methods approach. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63:e595–e603.
Pierre Albaladejo, Helene Beloeil, Luca Brazzi, et al . How to reduce our carbon footprint in the OR, in the hospital, on the planet – a tool-kit for beginners. ESAIC. Available at: https://www.esaic.org/uploads/2020/03/flash-display-screen1.pdf [Accessed January 2023].
Hernández ACG. Reducing Heathcare's Climate Footprint: Opportunities for European Hospitals & Health systems. 2016. Available at: https://noharm-europe.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/4746/HCWHEurope_Climate_Report_Dec2016.pdf . [Accessed January 2023].
Sustrans. Active Travel Toolkit – The role of active travel in improving health. 2017. Available at: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/research/all-themes/all/active-travel-toolkit-the-role-of-active-travel-in-improving-health [Accessed January 2023].
Roland H, Lorenz H. Environmental impacts of an international conference. Environ Impact Assessm Rev 2002; 22:543–557.
Tao Y, Steckel D, Klemeš JJ, et al. Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy. Nat Commun 2021; 12:7324.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240118 Date Completed: 20240304 Latest Revision: 20240321
رمز التحديث: 20240321
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001942
PMID: 38235604
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE