دورية أكاديمية

Understanding Relative Biological Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer Therapy Using Particle Irradiation: Analysis of Tumor Control Probability With the Modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Understanding Relative Biological Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer Therapy Using Particle Irradiation: Analysis of Tumor Control Probability With the Modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model.
المؤلفون: Besuglow J; Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology (E210), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany., Tessonnier T; Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology (E210), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany., Mein S; Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology (E210), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Eichkorn T; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany., Haberer T; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany., Herfarth K; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany., Abdollahi A; Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology (E210), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany., Debus J; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany., Mairani A; Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology (E210), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Physics, National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: Andrea.Mairani@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
المصدر: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2024 Aug 01; Vol. 119 (5), pp. 1545-1556. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 27.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7603616 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-355X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03603016 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: New York, NY : Elsevier, Inc
Original Publication: Elmsford, N. Y., Pergamon Press.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Prostatic Neoplasms*/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms*/pathology , Relative Biological Effectiveness* , Heavy Ion Radiotherapy* , Proton Therapy*/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted*/methods, Humans ; Male ; Probability ; Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use ; Organs at Risk/radiation effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Models, Biological ; Kinetics ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Rectum/radiation effects ; Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
مستخلص: Purpose: Recent experimental studies and clinical trial results might indicate that-at least for some indications-continued use of the mechanistic model for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) applied at carbon ion therapy facilities in Europe for several decades (LEM-I) may be unwarranted. We present a novel clinical framework for prostate cancer treatment planning and tumor control probability (TCP) prediction based on the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) for particle therapy.
Methods and Materials: Treatment plans of 91 patients with prostate tumors (proton: 46, carbon ions: 45) applying 66 GyRBE [RBE = 1.1 for protons and LEM-I, (α/β) x = 2.0 Gy, for carbon ions] in 20 fractions were recalculated using mMKM [(α/β) x = 3.1 Gy]). Based solely on the response data of photon-irradiated patient groups stratified according to risk and usage of androgen deprivation therapy, we derived parameters for an mMKM-based Poisson-TCP model. Subsequently, new carbon and helium ion plans, adhering to prescribed biological dose criteria, were generated. These were systematically compared with the clinical experience of Japanese centers employing an analogous fractionation scheme and existing proton plans.
Results: mMKM predictions suggested significant biological dose deviation between the proton and carbon ion arms. Patients irradiated with protons received (3.25 ± 0.08)  GyRBE mMKM /Fx, whereas patients treated with carbon ions received(2.51 ± 0.05)  GyRBE mMKM /Fx. TCP predictions were (86 ± 3)% for protons and (52 ± 4)% for carbon ions, matching the clinical outcome of 85% and 50%. Newly optimized carbon ion plans, guided by the mMKM/TCP model, effectively replicated clinical data from Japanese centers. Using mMKM, helium ions exhibited similar target coverage as proton and carbon ions and improved rectum and bladder sparing compared with proton.
Conclusions: Our mMKM-based model for prostate cancer treatment planning and TCP prediction was validated against clinical data for proton and carbon ion therapy, and its application was extended to helium ion therapy. Based on the data presented in this work, mMKM seems to be a good candidate for clinical biological calculations in carbon ion therapy for prostate cancer.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Androgen Antagonists)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240229 Date Completed: 20240722 Latest Revision: 20240723
رمز التحديث: 20240725
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.025
PMID: 38423224
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.025