دورية أكاديمية

Prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival rate of patients with uterine clear-cell carcinoma: Based on SEER database.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival rate of patients with uterine clear-cell carcinoma: Based on SEER database.
المؤلفون: Huang T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China., Lu F; Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
المصدر: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [Int J Gynaecol Obstet] 2024 Aug; Vol. 166 (2), pp. 707-717. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 05.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0210174 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-3479 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00207292 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2017- : Malden, MA : Wiley
Original Publication: [New York, NY] Hoeber Medical Division, Harper & Row, [c1969-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Nomograms* , SEER Program* , Uterine Neoplasms*/mortality , Uterine Neoplasms*/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms*/pathology , Neoplasm Staging* , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell*/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell*/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell*/therapy, Humans ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Adult ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; United States/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies
مستخلص: Objective: To evaluate the risk factors for uterine clear-cell carcinoma (UCCC) and construct nomograms predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with UCCC.
Methods: The demographic and clinical information of 1674 patients diagnosed with UCCC between 2004 and 2015, including age, race, marital status, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and details of surgery and radiotherapy/chemotherapy, was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After excluding patients with unknown AJCC stage, race, marital status, or lymph node information, 1469 patients remained. Risk factors were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses, and nomograms were developed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival of UCCC. Various indicators were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram, such as the C-index, net classification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: Age, log odds of positive lymph nodes, AJCC stage, surgery status, and chemotherapy status were independent risk factors for UCCC. The C-indexes of the training group and AJCC stage groups were 0.771 and 0.697, respectively. The results for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, NRI, and calibration curves indicated that the nomogram had good predictive ability. DCA revealed that the nomogram had greater clinical applicability than AJCC stage alone. Internal validation using the validation cohort also demonstrated that this nomogram had good predictive performance.
Conclusion: A new nomogram comprising a combination of demographic and clinical characteristics provided better survival predictions than the AJCC staging system alone, which will facilitate prognostic assessments and clinical decision-making.
(© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)
References: Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394‐424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492.
Gadducci A, Cosio S, Spirito N, Cionini L. Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a biological and clinical enigma. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:1327‐1334.
Pasanen A, Loukovaara M, Tuomi T, Bützow R. Preoperative risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma: L1CAM as a biomarker. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:1318‐1324. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001043.
Kasius JC, Pijnenborg JMA, Lindemann K, et al. Risk stratification of endometrial cancer patients: FIGO stage, biomarkers and molecular classification. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:5848. doi:10.3390/cancers13225848.
Kim SR, Cloutier BT, Leung S, et al. Molecular subtypes of clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: opportunities for prognostic and predictive stratification. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158:3‐11. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.043.
Mahdi H, Lockhart D, Moselmi‐Kebria M. Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine clear cell carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26:134‐140. doi:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.134.
Zhang K, Feng S, Ge Y, Ding B, Shen Y. A nomogram based on SEER database for predicting prognosis in patients with mucinous ovarian cancer: a real‐world study. Int J Women's Health. 2022;14:931‐943. doi:10.2147/ijwh.S372328.
Xu J, Huang C, Wu Z, et al. Risk prediction of second primary malignancies in primary early‐stage ovarian cancer survivors: a SEER‐based National Population‐Based Cohort Study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:875489. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.875489.
Li T, Yang Y, Wu W, et al. Prognostic implications of ENE and LODDS in relation to lymph node‐positive colorectal cancer location. Transl Oncol. 2021;14:101190. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101190.
Tang J, Jiang S, Gao L, et al. Construction and validation of a nomogram based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict the prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma after surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:4360‐4370. doi:10.1245/s10434-020-09567-3.
Wu W‐T, Li Y‐J, Feng A‐Z, et al. Data mining in clinical big data: the frequently used databases, steps, and methodological models. Mil Med Res. 2021;8:44. doi:10.1186/s40779-021-00338-z.
Braun MM, Overbeek‐Wager EA, Grumbo RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:468‐474.
Allard JE, Maxwell GL. Race disparities between black and white women in the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Cancer Control. 2009;16:53‐56. doi:10.1177/107327480901600108.
Dong J, Dai Q, Zhang F. The effect of marital status on endometrial cancer‐related diagnosis and prognosis: a surveillance epidemiology and end results database analysis. Future Oncol. 2019;15:3963‐3976. doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0241.
Schmoll H‐J. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edition. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:345. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg077.
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26:565‐574. doi:10.1177/0272989X06295361.
Yang J, Li Y, Liu Q, et al. Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era. J Evid Based Med. 2020;13:57‐69. doi:10.1111/jebm.12373.
Cirisano FD, Robboy SJ, Dodge RK, et al. Epidemiologic and surgicopathologic findings of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared to endometrioid carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:385‐394. doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5505.
Mattes MD, Lee JC, Metzger DJ, Ashamalla H, Katsoulakis E. The incidence of pelvic and para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma according to the SEER registry. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26:19‐24. doi:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.19.
Solmaz U, Mat E, Ekin A, et al. Optimal cytoreduction, depth of myometrial invasion, and age are independent prognostic factors for survival in women with uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas. Int J Surg. 2016;32:71‐77. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.041.
Ma X, Cao D, Zhou H, et al. Survival outcomes and the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features in patients with endometrial clear cell carcinoma: a 35‐year single‐center retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21:106. doi:10.1186/s12957-023-02992-0.
Crosbie EJ, Kitson SJ, McAlpine JN, Mukhopadhyay A, Powell ME, Singh N. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2022;399:1412‐1428. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00323-3.
Abu‐Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bradley K, et al. NCCN guidelines® insights: uterine neoplasms, version 3.2021. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2021;19:888‐895. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0038.
Concin N, Matias‐Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31:12‐39. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230.
Ye G, Chen Z, Wang L, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes predicts survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2020;121:1074‐1083. doi:10.1002/jso.25888.
Gao L, Lyu J, Luo X, et al. Nomogram to predict overall survival based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma after surgery. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:1149. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08888-0.
Yang X‐L, Huang N, Wang M‐M, Lai H, Wu D‐J. Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes for predicting survival outcomes in node‐positive endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:688535. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.688535.
de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high‐risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC‐3): final results of an international, open‐label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:295‐309. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2.
Vogel TJ, Knickerbocker A, Shah CA, et al. An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26:25‐31. doi:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25.
Xiang M, English DP, Kidd EA. National patterns of care and cancer‐specific outcomes of adjuvant treatment in patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:599‐604. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.007.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: nomogram; overall survival; prognostic model; uterine clear‐cell carcinoma
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240306 Date Completed: 20240717 Latest Revision: 20240717
رمز التحديث: 20240718
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15456
PMID: 38444201
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15456