دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Should tobacco sales be restricted to state-run alcohol outlets? Perspectives from 10 US alcohol control states.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Should tobacco sales be restricted to state-run alcohol outlets? Perspectives from 10 US alcohol control states.
المؤلفون: Smith EA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA., McDaniel PA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA., Malone RE; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
المصدر: Addiction (Abingdon, England) [Addiction] 2024 Jun; Vol. 119 (6), pp. 1048-1058. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 07.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9304118 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1360-0443 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09652140 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Addiction Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK : Carfax Pub. Co., c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Commerce*/legislation & jurisprudence , Alcoholic Beverages*/economics , Alcoholic Beverages*/supply & distribution, Humans ; United States ; Tobacco Products/economics ; Tobacco Products/legislation & jurisprudence ; Marketing/legislation & jurisprudence ; Qualitative Research ; State Government ; Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology
مستخلص: Background and Aims: The ubiquity of tobacco retailers helps to sustain the tobacco epidemic. A tobacco retail reduction approach that has not been tried is transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS), which are limited in number and operate under some restrictions, e.g. regarding opening hours or marketing materials. This study summarizes policy experts' and advocates' views of TTS, including (1) advantages and disadvantages; (2) feasibility; and (3) potential implementation obstacles.
Design: This study was a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews.
Setting: Ten US states with alcoholic beverage control systems were included.
Participants: The participants comprised a total of 103 tobacco control advocates and professionals, public health officials, alcohol policy experts and alcohol control system representatives, including two tribal community representatives.
Measurements: Interviewees' perspectives on their state's alcoholic beverage control agency (ABC, the agency that oversees or operates a state alcohol monopoly) and on TTS were assessed.
Findings: Interviewees thought TTS offered potential advantages, including reduced access to tobacco products, less exposure to tobacco advertising and a greater likelihood of successful smoking cessation. Some saw potential long-term health benefits for communities of color, due to the smaller number of state alcohol stores in those communities. Interviewees also raised concerns regarding TTS, including ABCs' limited focus on public health and emphasis on revenue generation, which could conflict with tobacco use reduction efforts. Some interviewees thought TTS could enhance the power of the tobacco and alcohol industries, increase calls for alcohol system privatization or create difficulties for those in recovery.
Conclusions: In the United States, transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS) could have a positive public health impact by reducing tobacco availability, marketing exposure and, ultimately, tobacco use. However, tensions exist between alcohol control system goals of providing revenue to the state and protecting public health. Should a state decide to pursue TTS, several guardrails should be established, including building into the legislation an explicit goal of reducing tobacco consumption.
(© 2024 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.)
References: Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:332-337. (PMID: 32721771)
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Nov;38(6):1162-7. (PMID: 16787633)
Prev Med. 2015 May;74:67-73. (PMID: 25689540)
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. (PMID: 16204405)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1263-1273. (PMID: 33155040)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):133-140. (PMID: 27127232)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):239-244. (PMID: 27613900)
Addiction. 2020 Apr;115(4):681-689. (PMID: 31670853)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Feb;18(2):147-55. (PMID: 25744959)
Tob Control. 2013 May;22 Suppl 1:i42-4. (PMID: 23591508)
Tob Control. 2023 Jun 5;:. (PMID: 37277180)
J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Sep;56(5):566-72. (PMID: 7475038)
J Public Health Policy. 2017 Aug;38(3):345-358. (PMID: 28432335)
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):1632. (PMID: 36038852)
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):27-33. (PMID: 29519934)
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jul 3;53(8):1229-1238. (PMID: 29257916)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Feb 02;20:E05. (PMID: 36729702)
Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(e1):e19-e24. (PMID: 29170167)
Am J Public Health. 2020 Apr;110(4):547-553. (PMID: 32078358)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Jul 13;24(8):1291-1299. (PMID: 35079790)
Addiction. 2012 Jan;107(1):169-75. (PMID: 21777322)
Ethn Health. 2021 Oct;26(7):1012-1027. (PMID: 31124377)
Tob Control. 2022 Dec;31(e2):e175-e188. (PMID: 34301839)
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:287-293. (PMID: 27569829)
Tob Control. 2009 Dec;18(6):496-501. (PMID: 19748884)
Addiction. 2013 Feb;108(2):339-47. (PMID: 22934914)
معلومات مُعتمدة: R01 CA229238 United States CA NCI NIH HHS; 1R01CA229238 United States CA NCI NIH HHS
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Alcohol control states; qualitative research; retail policy; tobacco end‐game; tobacco industry; tobacco policy
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240308 Date Completed: 20240506 Latest Revision: 20240626
رمز التحديث: 20240626
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11131590
DOI: 10.1111/add.16467
PMID: 38454636
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1360-0443
DOI:10.1111/add.16467