دورية أكاديمية
Time matters: Cervical ripening balloon for 6 versus 12 h-Retrospective comparison between two protocols.
| العنوان: | Time matters: Cervical ripening balloon for 6 versus 12 h-Retrospective comparison between two protocols. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Bleicher I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.; The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel., Korobochka M; Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia., Sagi S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel., Sammour R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. |
| المصدر: | International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [Int J Gynaecol Obstet] 2024 Aug; Vol. 166 (2), pp. 886-890. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 13. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Comparative Study |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0210174 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-3479 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00207292 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2017- : Malden, MA : Wiley Original Publication: [New York, NY] Hoeber Medical Division, Harper & Row, [c1969- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Cervical Ripening* , Labor, Induced*/methods , Cesarean Section*/statistics & numerical data, Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Adult ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Delivery, Obstetric/methods ; Pregnancy Outcome |
| مستخلص: | Objective: Recently, two randomized controlled trials compared removal of cervical ripening balloon (CRB) after 6 versus 12 h. Their results showed similar Bishop score changes in both groups and a shorter time to delivery in the 6-h group. Neither of the studies was powered to show difference in mode of delivery. The aim of this study was to compare mode of delivery when the CRB was removed after 6 versus 12 h. Methods: A historical control study comparing induction of labor with a CRB between two time periods, one in which the CRB was removed after 12 h (12-h group), and the other in which it was removed after 6 h (6-h group). We included term pregnancies with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We excluded patients with a previous cesarean delivery, failed ripening with prostaglandins prior to CRB insertion, and any contraindication for vaginal delivery. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery within 24 h and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: We included 1704 patients, 914 in the 12-h group, and 717 in the 6-h group. Removal after 6 h was associated with a lower rate of cesarean and instrumental deliveries (28.6% vs 22.5%, and 12% vs 6.2%, respectively) and a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h. All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Removing a cervical ripening balloon after 6 rather than 12 h is associated with reduced cesarean and instrumental delivery rates, and should be considered as a reasonable, and potentially superior alternative in labor induction protocols with intracervical ripening balloon. (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.) |
| References: | ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. PB 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(107):386‐397. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. Wing DA, Penfield CA, Wing DA. Labor induction techniques: which is the best? Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2017;44(4):567‐582. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.011. Forgie MM, Greer DM, Kram JJF, Wyst KBV, Salvo NP, Siddiqui DS. Foley catheter placement for induction of labor with or without stylette: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):397.e1‐397.e10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.043. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, et al. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):338.e1‐338.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029. Gu N, Ru T, Wang Z, et al. Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open‐label, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136856. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136856. Hoppe KK, Schiff MA, Peterson SE, Gravett MG. 30 mL single‐ versus 80 mL double‐balloon catheter for pre‐induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):1919‐1925. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297. Kashanian M, Nazemi M, Malakzadegan A. Comparison of 30‐mL and 80‐mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):174‐175. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.005. Berghella V, Bellussi F, Schoen CN. Evidence‐based labor management: induction of labor (part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100136. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100136. Salim R, Schwartz N, Zafran N, Zuarez‐Easton S, Garmi GRS. Comparison of single‐ and double‐balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Perinatol. 2018;38:217‐225. doi:10.1038/s41372-017-0005-7. Bleicher I, Dikopoltsev E, Kadour‐Ferro E, et al. Double‐balloon device for 6 compared with 12 hours for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1153‐1160. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003804. Lassey SC, Haber HR, Kanbergs A, Robinson JN, Little SE. Six versus twelve hours of single‐balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(6):611.e1‐611.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.021. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):800‐804. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654. Tran SH, Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Meconium‐stained amniotic fluid is associated with puerperal infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):746‐750. doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00767-1. Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez‐Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):177‐187; discussion 187–188. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.005. Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1024‐1029. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70007-3. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Bishop score; cervical balloon; double balloon; induction of labor; mechanical cervical ripening; unfavorable cervix |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240313 Date Completed: 20240717 Latest Revision: 20240717 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240718 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.15466 |
| PMID: | 38477600 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder كن أول من يترك تعليقا!