Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort.
المؤلفون:	Lee Argov EJ; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA., Rodriguez CB; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA., Agovino M; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA., Schmitt KM; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.; Division of Academics, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA., Desperito E; Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA., Karr AG; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA., Wei Y; Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, USA., Terry MB; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA.; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA., Tehranifar P; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA. pt140@columbia.edu.; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. pt140@columbia.edu.
المصدر:	Cancer causes & control : CCC [Cancer Causes Control] 2024 Aug; Vol. 35 (8), pp. 1133-1142. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 12.
نوع المنشور:	Journal Article
اللغة:	English
بيانات الدورية:	Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9100846 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-7225 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09575243 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cancer Causes Control Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة:	Publication: Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd., 1990-
مواضيع طبية MeSH:	Breast Density* , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Early Detection of Cancer , Hispanic or Latino* , Mammography*, Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Mass Screening ; New York/epidemiology
مستخلص:	Purpose: Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort. Methods: Women aged 40-60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression. Results: In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12-0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups. Conclusion: Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
References:	CDC Breast Cancer. What does it mean to have dense breasts? Centers for disease control and prevention. Published July 27, 2023. Accessed 18 Sept 2023 https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/dense-breasts.htm. Bodewes FTH, van Asselt AA, Dorrius MD, Greuter MJW, de Bock GH (2022) Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 66:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007361836719530665) Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa06279017229950) McCormack VA, dos Santos SI (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034. (PMID: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-003416775176) Wanders JOP, Holland K, Veldhuis WB et al (2017) Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s10549-016-4090-728012087) State Legislation Map \| DenseBreast-info, Inc. Accessed 27 May 2022 https://densebreast-info.org/legislative-information/state-legislation-map/. Saraiya A, Baird GL, Lourenco AP (2019) Breast density notification letters and websites: are they too “dense”? J Am Coll Radiol 16(5):717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.00730686686) About Dense Breasts. Accessed 21 August 2023 https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/cancer/breast/dense_breasts.htm. Huang S, Houssami N, Brennan M, Nickel B (2021) The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 187(1):11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w. (PMID: 10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w33774734) American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting & data system. Accessed 21 August 2023 https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Bi-Rads. Dense Breasts: Answers to Commonly Asked Questions—NCI. Published 16 Feb 2018. Accessed 18 Sept 2023 https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/breast-changes/dense-breasts. O’Driscoll J, Burke A, Mooney T et al (2023) A scoping review of programme specific mammographic breast density related guidelines and practices within breast screening programmes. Eur J Radiol Open 11:100510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100510. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.1005103756016610407884) Wilkinson AN (2023) Breast density notification: are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management? Can Fam Physician 69(11):748–750. https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6911748. (PMID: 10.46747/cfp.69117483796378910645451) Breast Density Notification Map 2023 \| Mybreastscreening.ca. Accessed 9 Jan 2024 https://mybreastscreening.ca/about/. Ingman WV, Richards B, Street JM et al (2020) Breast density notification: An Australian perspective. J Clin Med 9(3):681. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030681. (PMID: 10.3390/jcm9030681321383077141298) Pirikahu S, Lund H, Cadby G, Wylie E, Stone J (2022) The impact of breast density notification on rescreening rates within a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast Cancer Res 24(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13058-021-01499-4/TABLES/3. (PMID: 10.1186/S13058-021-01499-4/TABLES/3) Lee Argov EJ, Rodriguez CB, Agovino M et al (2022) Breast cancer worry, uncertainty, and perceived risk following breast density notification in a longitudinal mammography screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 24(1):95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01584-2. (PMID: 10.1186/s13058-022-01584-2365442259773500) Kressin NR, Wormwood JB, Battaglia TA, Slanetz PJ, Gunn CM (2022) A letter is not enough: Women’s preferences for and experiences of receiving breast density information. Patient Educ Couns 105(7):2450–2456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.014. (PMID: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.014355343009250336) Kressin NR, Wormwood JB, Battaglia TA, Slanetz PJ, Gunn CM (2023) Women’s reactions to breast density information vary by sociodemographic characteristics. Womens Health Issues 33(4):435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.0023708731210330326) Manning M, Albrecht TL, O’Neill S, Purrington K (2019) Between-race differences in supplemental breast cancer screening before and after breast density notification law. J Am Coll Radiol 16(6):797–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.020. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.02030342908) Chau SL, Alabaster A, Luikart K, Brenman LM, Habel LA (2017) The effect of California’s breast density notification legislation on breast cancer screening. J Prim Care Community Health 8(2):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916674889. (PMID: 10.1177/215013191667488927799412) Aripoli A, Fountain K, Winblad O et al (2018) Supplemental screening with automated breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts: comparing notification methods and screening behaviors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(1):W22–W28. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18158. (PMID: 10.2214/AJR.17.1815829045183) Nyante SJ, Marsh MW, Benefield T, Earnhardt K, Lee SS, Henderson LM (2020) Supplemental breast imaging utilization after breast density legislation in North Carolina. J Am Coll Radiol 17(1):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.054. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.05431271735) Dolan H, McCaffery K, Houssami N et al (2022) Australian women’s intentions and psychological outcomes related to breast density notification and information: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 5(6):e2216784. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16784. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16784357086919204548) Pacsi-Sepulveda AL, Shelton RC, Rodriguez CB, Coq AT, Tehranifar P (2019) “You probably can’t feel as safe as normal women”: Hispanic women’s reactions to breast density notification. Cancer 125(12):2049–2056. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32002. (PMID: 10.1002/cncr.3200230768781) Tehranifar P, Rodriguez CB, April-Sanders AK, Desperito E, Schmitt KM (2018) Migration history, language acculturation, and mammographic breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27(5):566–574. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0885. (PMID: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-088529475965) Austin JD, Agovino M, Rodriguez CB et al (2021) Breast density awareness and knowledge in a mammography screening cohort of predominantly Hispanic women: does breast density notification matter? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 30(10):1913–1920. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0172. (PMID: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0172343489588492494) Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL (2011) Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155(8):481–492. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004. (PMID: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004220070423209800) Dittus K, Geller B, Weaver DL et al (2013) Impact of mammography screening interval on breast cancer diagnosis by menopausal status and BMI. J Gen Intern Med 28(11):1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0237607413797353) Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ (2004) Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med 36(8):588–594. (PMID: 15343421) Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY et al (2015) Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk. J Clin Oncol 33(10):1143–1150. (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0325257321564551864) Sanders LM, King AB, Goodman KS (2016) Impact of the New Jersey breast density law on imaging and intervention volumes and breast cancer diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol 13(10):1189–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.05.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.05.00527318582) Manning M, O’Neill S, Purrington K (2021) Physicians’ perceptions of breast density notification laws and appropriate patient follow-up. Breast J 27(7):586–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14240. (PMID: 10.1111/tbj.1424033991030) Siu AL (2016) US preventive services task force screening for breast cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 164(4):279–96. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2886. (PMID: 10.7326/M15-288626757170)
معلومات مُعتمدة:	1R01MD011506 United States MD NIMHD NIH HHS; 1R01MD011506 United States MD NIMHD NIH HHS
فهرسة مساهمة:	Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Breast density; Breast density notification; Cancer screening; Screening mammography
تواريخ الأحداث:	Date Created: 20240412 Date Completed: 20240723 Latest Revision: 20240724
رمز التحديث:	20240725
DOI:	10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7
PMID:	38607569
قاعدة البيانات:	MEDLINE

Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag.

Full Text Finder

الوصف
تدمد:	1573-7225
DOI:	10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7