دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Physical and occupational therapists' learning needs and preferences for education on functional electrical stimulation: A qualitative descriptive study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Physical and occupational therapists' learning needs and preferences for education on functional electrical stimulation: A qualitative descriptive study.
المؤلفون: Musselman KE; Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Mayhew M; Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Somal H; Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Benn NL; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Salbach NM; Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Switzer-McIntyre S; Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
المصدر: Artificial organs [Artif Organs] 2024 Sep; Vol. 48 (9), pp. 1018-1030. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 15.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7802778 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1525-1594 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0160564X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Artif Organs Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Cambridge, MA : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Cleveland, International Society for Artificial Organs.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Qualitative Research* , Occupational Therapists*/psychology , Occupational Therapists*/education , Physical Therapists*/education , Physical Therapists*/psychology, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Learning ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods ; Middle Aged ; Canada ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
مستخلص: Background: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an evidence-based intervention that is rarely used by Canadian physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs). A common barrier to FES implementation is a lack of knowledge and training. FES learning resources that meet therapists' learning needs and preferences may address this barrier.
Objective: To explore OTs' and PTs' perspectives on the utility of FES e-learning resources, including whether the resources met their learning needs and preferences.
Methods: Through this qualitative descriptive study, feedback on FES e-learning resources was solicited from 5 PTs and 18 OTs who work clinically, but do not use FES. Participants reviewed ≥3 prerecorded lectures on FES topics and then completed a semi-structured interview. Participants were asked about the lectures' content, delivery, ease of use and comprehensibility, and were asked to suggest modifications to facilitate self-directed learning about FES. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
Results: Three themes were identified. (1) Feedback on FES e-learning: the content and delivery of the prerecorded lectures facilitated participants' learning, although opportunities to improve content and delivery were identified. (2) Factors influencing FES learning needs and preferences: Participants identified internal (i.e., baseline knowledge, learning style) and external (i.e., learning with colleagues, practice setting) factors that affected learning. Themes 1 and 2 impacted (3) the effects of FES e-learning: Participants described the outcomes of their FES e-learning, including increases in FES knowledge, confidence, and use in clinical practice.
Conclusion: Therapists' perceived the FES e-learning resources to be useful and to address their learning needs and preferences.
(© 2024 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Chiu HC, Ada L. Effect of functional electrical stimulation on activity in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(3):283–288.
Patil S, Raza W, Jamil F, Caley R, O'Connor R. Functional electrical stimulation for the upper limb in tetraplegic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Med Eng Technol. 2014;39(7):419–423.
Renfrew LM, Lord AC, Warren J, Hunter R. Evaluating the effect of functional electrical stimulation used for foot drop on aspects of health‐related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2019;21(4):173–182.
Howlett O, McKinstry C, Lannin NA. Using functional electrical stimulation with stroke survivors: a survey of Victorian occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65:306–313.
van der Scheer J, Goosey‐Tolfrey V, Valentino S, Davis G, Ho C. Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness‐related outcomes. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18:99.
Bekhet AH, Bochkezanian V, Saab IM, Gorgey AS. The effects of electrical stimulation parameters in managing spasticity after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(6):484–499.
Stein C, Fritsch CG, Robinson C, Sbruzzi G. Effects of electrical stimulation in spastic muscles after stroke. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2197–2205.
Kapadia N, Masani K, Craven BC, Giangregorio LM, Hitzig SL, Richards K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on walking competency. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37(5):511–524.
Moll I, Vles JSH, Staal HM, Koudijs SM, Vermeulen RJ. Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(12):1230–1236.
Miller L, McFadyen A, Lord A, Hunter R, Paul L, Rafferty D, et al. Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effect on gait speed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1435–1452.
Houghton P, Campbell K, CPG Panel. Canadian best practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury: a resource handbook for clinicians. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation; 2013 [cited 2022 Jul 16]. Available from: https://estim4wounds.ca/wp‐content/uploads/TheCanadianBPGforPreventionandManagementofPressureUlcersinPeoplewithSCI.pdf.
Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence. SCIRE professional spinal cord injury research evidence; 2021. [cited 2022 Jun 20]. Available from: https://scireproject.com/evidence/rehabilitation‐evidence/.
Teasell R, Iruthayarajah J, Saikaley M, Longval M. Executive summary: evidence based review of stroke rehabilitation. 2018 [cited 2022 Jun 20]. Available from: ebrsr.com/sites/default/files/documents/Executive%20Summary%20Total%202020_JI.pdf.
Johnston TE, Keller S, Denzer‐Weiler C, Brown L. A clinical practice guideline for the use of ankle‐foot orthoses and functional electrical stimulation post‐stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2021;45(2):112–196.
Bulley C, Burridge J, Adonis A, Joiner S, Curnow E. Delphi consensus study and clinical practice guideline development for functional electrical stimulation to support upright mobility in people with an upper motor neuron lesion. Artif Organs. 2024;48(3):285–296.
Auchstaetter N, Luc J, Lukye S, Lynd K, Schemenauer S, Whittaker M, et al. Physical therapists' use of functional electrical stimulation for clients with stroke: frequency, barriers, and facilitators. Phys Ther. 2016;96(7):995–1005.
Salbach NM. Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):100.
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation at CIHR; 2016 [cited 2024 Feb 28]. Available from: https://cihr‐irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html.
Abouzakhm N, Choy S, Feld R, Taylor C, Carter K, Degroot S, et al. Evaluating the validity of a functional electrical stimulation clinical decision making tool: a qualitative study. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1001123.
Musselman KE, Provad E, Djuric A, Bercovitch D, Yuen I, Kane KJ. Exploring the experiences and perceptions of pediatric therapists who use functional electrical stim. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2023;43(6):759–779.
Brown L, Street T, Adonis A, Johnston TE, Ferrante S, Burridge JH, et al. Implementing functional electrical stimulation clinical practice guidelines to support mobility: a stakeholder consultation. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1062356.
Tedesco Triccas L, Donovan‐Hall M, Dibb B, Helena J. A nation‐wide survey exploring the views of current and future use of functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(6):752–762.
Novak I, Morgan C, Fahey M, Finch‐Edmondson M, Galea C, Hines A, et al. State of the evidence traffic lights 2019: systematic review of interventions for preventing and treating children with cerebral palsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20(2):3.
International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society. General considerations in the clinical application of electrical stimulation. [cited 2022 Jul 17]. Available from: ifess.org/general‐considerations‐in‐the‐clinical‐application‐of‐electrical‐stimulation/.
Cameron M. Physical agents in rehabilitation: from research to practice. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Available from: https://www.equator‐network.org/reporting‐guidelines/coreq/.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
Noy C. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2009;11(4):327–344.
Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora A. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
Olin SS, Nadeem E, Gleacher A, Weaver J, Weiss D, Hoagwood KE, et al. What predicts clinician dropout from state‐sponsored managing and adapting practice training. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2016;43(6):945–956.
McNair R, Taft A, Hegarty K. Using reflexivity to enhance in‐depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:73.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277–1288.
Ahmed SK. The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. J Med. 2024;2:100051.
Tobin G, Begley C. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–396.
Marquez‐Chin C. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19(1):34.
Bulley C. Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):263.
Brown L, Johnston TE, Keller S, Denzer‐Weiler C. A survey of clinical practice patterns of physical therapists for the use of ankle‐foot orthoses or functional electrical stimulation poststroke. J Prosthet Orthot. 2024;36(2):124–132.
Landers M, McWhorter J, Krum L, Glovinsky D. Mandatory continuing education in physical therapy: survey of physical therapists in states with and states without a mandate. Phys Ther. 2005;85(9):861–871.
Lawani MA, Turgeon Y, Côté L, Légaré F, Witteman H, Morin M, et al. User‐centered and theory‐based design of a professional training program on shared decision‐making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed‐methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):59.
Austin TM, Graber KC. Variables influencing physical therapists' perceptions of continuing education. Phys Ther. 2007;87(8):1023–1036.
Mahdavi Ardestani SF, Adibi S, Golshan A, Sadeghian P. Factors influencing the effectiveness of e‐learning in healthcare: a fuzzy ANP study. Healthcare. 2023;11(14):2035.
Reeves S, Fletcher S, McLoughlin C, Yim A, Patel KD. Interprofessional online learning for primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016872.
Salbach NM, MacKay‐Lyons M, Solomon P, Howe JA, McDonald A, Bayley MT, et al. The role of theory to develop and evaluate a toolkit to increase clinical measurement and interpretation. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(14):3719–3735.
Yamada J, Shorkey A, Barwick M, Widger K, Stevens BJ. The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006808.
Jeong D, Presseau J, ElChamaa R, Naumann DN, Mascaro C, Luconi F, et al. Barriers and facilitators to self‐directed learning in continuing professional development for physicians in Canada: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1245–1254.
Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. Adult learning theories in context: a quick guide for healthcare professional educators. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019;6:2382120519840332.
Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–e1572.
معلومات مُعتمدة: Canada CAPMC CIHR; Paralyzed Veterans of America Education Foundation; Canada CAPMC CIHR; Canada Research Chairs
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: education; functional electrical stimulation; qualitative research; rehabilitation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240416 Date Completed: 20240813 Latest Revision: 20240813
رمز التحديث: 20240813
DOI: 10.1111/aor.14756
PMID: 38622826
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1525-1594
DOI:10.1111/aor.14756